Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 53, No. 4, 2007
Issue release date: June 2007
Section title: Clinical Section
Gerontology 2007;53:224–227
(DOI:10.1159/000100898)

Risk Factors for Aspiration Pneumonia after Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy

Kitamura T. · Nakase H. · Iizuka H.
Department of Surgery, Municipal Kouyo Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 33.00
Account: USD 23.00

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Section

Received: 6/6/2006
Accepted: 1/19/2007
Published online: 3/15/2007
Issue release date: June 2007

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/GER

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is generally used for long-term enteral nutrition. Patients who require PEG placement are often very sick, and postoperative complications, especially aspiration pneumonia, can be fatal. Objective: In this study we investigated the risk factors for aspiration pneumonia after PEG using a simple two-step swallowing provocation test (S-SPT), as reported in 1999 by Teramoto et al. Methods: The study included 29 patients (10 men, 19 women; mean age 84.6 years) who underwent S-SPT before PEG. We evaluated the presence of reflux esophagitis (RE) and esophageal hiatal hernia (EHH) with PEG. According to the S-SPT results, a normal response to the 1st step S-SPT was given a score of 0, a normal response to the 2nd step S-SPT was given a score of 1, and an abnormal response to the 2nd step S-SPT was given a score of 3. In addition to S-SPT, the presence of RE was given a score of 3, the absence of RE was given a score of 0, the presence of EHH was given a score of 2, and the absence of EHH was given a score of 0. We evaluated the association between the presence of aspiration pneumonia, as an early and critical complication, up to 1 month after PEG and determined the total risk score (score of S-SPT+ score of RE+ score of EHH). Results: The group with an abnormal response to the 2nd step S-SPT and the group with RE both exhibited aspiration pneumonia. The patients with aspiration pneumonia all achieved total scores ≧3, and 8 of 13 patients without aspiration pneumonia achieved scores ≤2. Conclusions: S-SPT is particularly useful in PEG patients. The scores provided by S-SPT and endoscopic examination can be very useful for aspiration pneumonia after PEG. The patients with scores ≤2 appear to be at very low risk for aspiration pneumonia, and patients with the scores ≧3 should be carefully followed up.

© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


  

Author Contacts

Toshiro Kitamura, MD
Department of Surgery, Municipal Kouyo Hospital
3954 Ohatta Nagasakacho, Hokuto City
Yamanashi 408-0034 (Japan)
Tel. +81 551 323 221, Fax +81 551 327 191, E-Mail chezkita@hotmail.com

  

Article Information

Received: June 6, 2006
Accepted: January 19, 2007
Published online: March 15, 2007
Number of Print Pages : 4
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 12

  

Publication Details

Gerontology (International Journal of Experimental, Clinical and Behavioural Gerontology)

Vol. 53, No. 4, Year 2007 (Cover Date: June 2007)

Journal Editor: Meier-Ruge, W. (Basel)
ISSN: 0304–324X (print), 1423–0003 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/GER


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Section

Received: 6/6/2006
Accepted: 1/19/2007
Published online: 3/15/2007
Issue release date: June 2007

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/GER


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.