Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login (Shibboleth)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Table of Contents
Vol. 2, No. 4, 2007
Issue release date: August 2007
Section title: Original Article · Originalarbeit
Breast Care 2007;2:195-202

Adaptive Coping and Spirituality as a Resource in Cancer Patients

Büssing A. · Ostermann T. · Matthiessen P.F.
Arbeitsgruppe Spiritualität und Krankheitsumgang, Lehrstuhl für Medizintheorie und Komplementärmedizin, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Germany

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Aim: We intended to clarify which strategies to control their diseases were utilized by patients with chronic diseases and whether they are convinced that spirituality/religiosity (SpR) may offer some beneficial effects. Patients and Methods: We investigated elderly German insurants and outpatients with chronic diseases with the SpREUK and AKU questionnaires. Results: Patients with chronic diseases relied on adaptive coping styles which refer to both external help (Trust in Medical Help, Search for Alternative Help, Trust in God’s Help) and internal powers/ virtues (Conscious and Healthy Living, Perspectives and Positive Attitudes). Reappraisal (Illness as Chance) was strongly connected with Trust in God’s Help, which was of relevance particularly for female cancer patients. Compared to patients with other chronic diseases, cancer patients were significantly more in Search for Meaningful Support, had Trust in Higher Source and a Positive Interpretation of Disease. Women with breast cancer had significantly higher interest in Search for Meaningful Support and Positive Interpretation than patients with prostate cancer. The SpR attitudes and convictions were significantly influenced by gender, SpR self-categorization, and educational level. Conclusion: Particularly women with breast cancer refer to SpR issues and existential practices in order to better cope with their illness. In medical context, however, these needs are often neither recognized nor addressed.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article · Originalarbeit

Published online: July 16, 2007
Issue release date: August 2007

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1661-3791 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-3805 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/BRC

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.