Impaired Vasorelaxation in Inbred Mice Is Associated with Alterations in Both Nitric Oxide and Super Oxide PathwaysChen C. · Korshunov V.A. · Massett M.P. · Yan C. · Berk B.C.
Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, N.Y., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Recently, we showed that genetic factors determine flow-dependent vascular remodeling. Among five inbred mouse strains, the SJL strain developed the largest intima in response to low flow. Because SJL mice have a spontaneous mutation in superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD-2) we tested the hypothesis that strain-specific variations in vascular function are due to alterations in redox and nitric oxide (NO) pathways. Vasorelaxation to acetylcholine was significantly impaired in aortic rings from SJL compared to C3H or FVB mice (up to 40%). Relaxation to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (SNP) in SJL mice was also significantly impaired at low concentrations, with decreases in sensitivity and maximal relaxation to SNP compared to C3H and FVB mice. Western blot analyses showed significantly decreased expression (∼40%) of eNOS, PKG and SOD-2 proteins in SJL vasculature compared to C3H. Intact aortas from SJL showed significantly increased nitrotyrosine and decreased SOD-2 expression compared to C3H by immunohistochemistry. Basal levels of superoxide in aortas from SJL were not significantly different than C3H as measured by dihydroethidine. In summary, relatively small alterations in redox (SOD-2) and NO pathways (eNOS and PKG) may contribute to significantly impaired vasorelaxation in SJL mice.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.