Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login (Shibboleth)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Table of Contents
Vol. 30, No. 1, 2008
Issue release date: March 2008
Section title: Methods in Neuroepidemiology
Free Access
Neuroepidemiology 2008;30:58–69

The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics

Roberts R.O.a · Geda Y.E.a, d · Knopman D.S.c · Cha R.H.b · Pankratz V.S.b · Boeve B.F.c · Ivnik R.J.d · Tangalos E.G.e · Petersen R.C.a, c · Rocca W.A.a, c
Divisions of aEpidemiology and bBiostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, and Departments of cNeurology, dPsychiatry and Psychology, and ePrimary Care Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., USA
email Corresponding Author

Dr. Rosebud O. Roberts

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research

Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW

Rochester, MN 55905 (USA)

Tel. +1 507 284 5656, Fax +1 507 284 1516, E-Mail roberts.rosebud@mayo.edu

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Background: The objective of this study was to establish a prospective population-based cohort to investigate the prevalence, incidence and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Methods: The Olmsted County, Minn., population, aged 70–89 years on October 1, 2004, was enumerated using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Eligible subjects were randomly selected and invited to participate. Participants underwent a comprehensive in-person evaluation including the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, a neurological evaluation and neuropsychological testing. A consensus diagnosis of normal cognition, MCI or dementia was made by a panel using previously published criteria. A subsample of subjects was studied via telephone interview. Results: Four hundred and two subjects with dementia were identified from a detailed review of their medical records but were not contacted. At baseline, we successfully evaluated 703 women aged 70–79 years, 769 women aged 80–89 years, 730 men aged 70–79 years and 517 men aged 80–89 years (total n = 2,719). Among the participants, 2,050 subjects were evaluated in person and 669 via telephone. Conclusions: Strengths of the study are that the subjects were randomly selected from a defined population, the majority of the subjects were examined in person, and MCI was defined using published criteria. Here, we report the design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Methods in Neuroepidemiology

Received: August 11, 2007
Accepted: November 21, 2007
Published online: February 07, 2008
Issue release date: March 2008

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0251-5350 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0208 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NED

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.