Long-Term Assessment of Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Findings in Norwegian Elite Endurance AthletesBjørnstad H.H.a · Bjørnstad T.H.b · Urheim S.c · Hoff P.I.a · Smith G.d · Maron B.J.e
aDepartment of Heart Diseases, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, bDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, cDepartment of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, and dHeart and Lung Centre, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; eMinneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minn., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Objectives: The long-term outcome and clinical significance of athlete’s heart has been debated and more longitudinal data are needed. We present a prospective 15 years’ follow-up study of ECG and echo findings in elite endurance athletes following the end of their competitive career. Methods: Clinical evaluation, ECG, ambulatory Holter recording and echocardiography were performed in 30 top-level endurance athletes with a mean age of 24 years with follow-up 15 years later. All had then ended their competitive career, but still performed recreational sports activities. Results: No clinical events were reported. Average resting heart rate was unchanged (53.5 ± 10 at baseline and 55.4 ± 11 at follow-up, p = n.s.), complex ventricular arrhythmias did not occur and the number of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) were 0.4 ± 0.8/h at baseline and 3.8 ± 10/h at follow-up (p = n.s.). In a subgroup of 4 subjects with >100 VPBs per hour at follow-up left ventricular mass was increased compared to the others (p < 0.03). Furthermore, regression of sino-atrial (SA) and atrioventricular (AV) blocks was shown. There were no cases of atrial flutter or fibrillation. There was a slight reduction in mean left ventricular wall thickness (9.9 ± 1.2 vs. 9.5 ± 1.4 mm, p < 0.05) and a highly significant reduction of relative wall thickness (0.38 vs. 0.35, p < 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (68 ± 6 vs. 70 ± 7 ml ml/m2, p = n.s.) and left ventricular mass (109 ± 19 vs. 107 ± 19 g/m2, p = n.s.) were unchanged when corrected for body surface area and ejection fraction (EF) increased (60 ± 7 vs. 67 ± 6%, p < 0.01). Parameters of left ventricular diastolic function were normal both at baseline and follow-up. Conclusions: There was no evidence of deleterious cardiac effects of previous top-level endurance athletic activity at 15 years’ follow-up.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.