Functional Outcome in Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation: Predicting No, Low and High Response PatientsPaolucci S.a · Antonucci G.a,b · Pratesi L.a · Traballesi M.a · Lubich S.a · Grasso M.G.a
a IRCCS Santa Lucia and b Department of Psychology, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Rome, Italy
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
The aims of this study were: (1) to identify reliable prognostic factors for detecting subgroups of no, low and high response in consecutive patients admitted for rehabilitation of first stroke sequelae, and (2) to quantify the relative risk of poor or excellent prognosis on both Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and mobility for each significant variable. We prospectively studied 440 of 475 patients. From a group of 32 independent variables, those significantly associated with no, low and high effectiveness on both ADL and mobility were selected by means of multiple regression; then, the relative risk was calculated for each variable that significantly entered the multiple regressions. Patients with severe impairment or with global aphasia showed a relative risk of no response 4–6 times higher than that of other patients. An interval before rehabilitation longer than 2 months was associated with an increasing risk of no response. Elderly patients had a significantly higher relative risk of low response both on ADL and mobility. The presence of hemineglect and depression was associated with an increasing risk of low response on ADL but not on mobility. The absence of hemineglect and a short interval are prerequisites for an excellent functional prognosis on both ADL and mobility. A minor impairment, employed status, the absence of global aphasia and age ≤65 years increased the risk of high response. At the beginning of treatment, clear prognostic factors for the detection of subgroups with poor or excellent rehabilitation prognosis can be identified.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.