For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.
For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.
Obesity and Physical Inactivity: The Relevance of Reconsidering the Notion of SedentarinessChaput J.-P. · Tremblay A.
Division of Kinesiology, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada Corresponding Author
Angelo Tremblay, Ph.D., Division of Kinesiology (PEPS), Laval University, Québec City, G1K 7P4, QC, Canada, Tel. +1 418 656-7294, Fax -3044, email@example.com
The population statistics of most countries of the world are indicating that industrialization and computerization have been associated with an increase in sedentariness and more recently with a significant shift from healthy weight to overweight. In general, this change in the overweight/obesity prevalence is attributed by health professionals to suboptimal diet and physical activity practices. However, recent data raised the possibility that excess weight gain might also be the outcome of changes imposed by our ‘24-hour’, hectic lifestyle. Parallel to an increase in body weight, one has observed a reduction in sleep time and an increase in knowledge-based work (KBW) that appear as a growing necessity in a context of economic competitiveness and globalization. Sleep and cognitive work both exert a trivial effect on energy expenditure and may thus be considered as sedentary activities. However, their respective effect on energy intake is opposite. Indeed, an increase in the practice of the most sedentary activity, i.e. sleep, is associated with a hormonal profile facilitating appetite control whereas KBW appears as a stimulus favoring a significant enhancing effect on food intake. Television viewing is another example of sedentary activity that has been shown to increase the intake of high-density foods. These observations demonstrate that the modern way of living has favored a change in human activities whose impact goes well beyond what has traditionally been attributed to a lack of physical exercise. Therefore, we will need to reconsider the notion of ‘sedentariness’ which includes several activities having opposing effects on energy balance.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel