For more than a century it has been noted that the adult human vocal tract differs from that of other mammals, in that the resting position of the larynx is much lower in humans. While animals habitually breathe with the larynx inserted into the nasal cavity, adult humans are unable to do this. This anatomical difference has been cited as an important factor limiting the vocal potential of nonhuman animals, because the low larynx of humans allows a wider range of vocal tract shapes and thus formant patterns than is available to other species. However, it is not clear that the static anatomy of dead animals provides an accurate guide to the phonetic potential of the living animal’s vocal tract. Here I present X-ray video observations of four mammal species (dogs Canis familiaris, goats Capra hircus, pigs Sus scrofa and cotton-top tamarins Sagunius oedipus). In all four species, the larynx was lowered from the nasopharynx, and the velum was closed, during loud calls. In dogs this temporary lowering was particularly pronounced. Although preliminary, these results suggest that the nonhuman vocal tract is more flexible than previously supposed, and that static postmortem anatomy provides an incomplete guide to the phonetic potential of nonhuman animals. The implications of these findings for theories of speech evolution are discussed.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
Dr. W. Tecumseh Fitch
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology
Harvard University and Program in Speech and Hearing Science (Harvard/MIT), 33 Kirkland Street, Room 982
Cambridge, MA 02138 (USA), Tel. +1 617 496-6575
Fax +1 617 496-8279, E-Mail email@example.com
Received: Received: November 1, 1999
Accepted: February 14, 2000
Number of Print Pages : 14
Number of Figures : 6, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 29
Phonetica (International Journal of Phonetic Science)
Founded 1957 by E. Zwirner
Vol. 57, No. 2-4, Year 2000 (Cover Date: April-December 2000)
Journal Editor: Klaus Kohler, Kiel
ISSN: 0031–8388 (print), 1423–0321 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/journals/pho
Article / Publication Details
Published online: 8/22/2000
Issue release date: April–December 2000
Number of Print Pages: 14
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0031-8388 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0321 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PHO
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.