Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login (Shibboleth)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Table of Contents
Vol. 30, No. 4, 2010
Issue release date: September 2010
Section title: Original Paper
Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;30:389–395
(DOI:10.1159/000316886)

Pathophysiological Determinants of Worse Stroke Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation

Tu H.T.H.a, b · Campbell B.C.V.a, b · Christensen S.c · Collins M.d · De Silva D.A.b, j · Butcher K.S.i · Parsons M.W.g · Desmond P.M.c · Barber P.A.h · Levi C.R.g · Bladin C.F.f · Donnan G.A.e · Davis S.M.a, b · for the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET) Investigators
Departments of aMedicine, bNeurology and cRadiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, dDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, and eFlorey Neuroscience Institutes, Parkville, Vic., fDepartment of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., and gDepartment of Neurology and Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia; hDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; iFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta., Canada; jSingapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: February 23, 2010
Accepted: May 31, 2010
Published online: August 05, 2010
Issue release date: September 2010

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CED

Abstract

Background: The reasons for worse outcome following ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear. We aimed to elucidate the pathophysiological determinants of poorer stroke outcome in patients with AF using systematic MRI data from the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET). Methods: Comparisons of infarct size, hypoperfusion volume, infarct growth, arterial occlusion, recanalization, reperfusion, hemorrhagic transformation and stroke severity were made between patients with and without AF enrolled in the EPITHET study. Results: AF was present in 42 of 101 patients. At baseline, AF patients were older (79 vs. 73 years, p = 0.02), had more severe neurological impairment (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 16 vs. 11, p = 0.006), larger infarcts (29 vs. 15 ml, p = 0.04) and greater volumes of more severe hypoperfusion (Tmax ≧8 s, perfusion-weighted imaging volume 70 vs. 43 ml, p = 0.01) compared to patients without AF. There were no significant differences in arterial occlusion site, infarct growth, recanalization or reperfusion. At outcome, AF patients had larger infarcts (52 vs. 16 ml, p = 0.05), more severe hemorrhagic transformation (29 vs. 5%, p = 0.002 for parenchymal hematomas), greater disability (modified Rankin Scale score 4 vs. 3, p = 0.03) and higher mortality rates (31 vs. 12%, p = 0.04). AF was an independent predictor of parenchymal hematoma (OR = 6.90, 95% CI = 1.57–30.25), but not mortality (OR = 2.56, 95% CI = 0.83–7.85). Conclusions: Patients with AF have worse clinical and imaging outcomes following ischemic stroke. This study suggests that the adverse effect of AF is due to greater volumes of more severely hypoperfused tissue, leading to larger infarct size and greater risk of severe hemorrhagic transformation.

© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: February 23, 2010
Accepted: May 31, 2010
Published online: August 05, 2010
Issue release date: September 2010

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CED


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.