Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login (Shibboleth)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Table of Contents
Vol. 71, No. 2, 2011
Issue release date: July 2011
Section title: Paper
Hum Hered 2011;71:97–105

Attempted Replication of 50 Reported Asthma Risk Genes Identifies a SNP in RAD50 as Associated with Childhood Atopic Asthma

Murk W.a · Walsh K.a · Hsu L.-Ia · Zhao L.a · Bracken M.B.b · DeWan A.T.a
aDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University, and bCenter for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Conn., USA
email Corresponding Author

Andrew T. DeWan, PhD, MPH

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health

Yale University, 60 College Street

New Haven, CT 06520 (USA)

Tel. +1 203 785 3528, E-Mail andrew.dewan@yale.edu

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Objectives: Asthma is a childhood disease that is strongly influenced by genetic factors. We sought to replicate an association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the top-ranked candidate genes and childhood atopic asthma in Perinatal Risk of Asthma in Infants of Asthmatic Mothers (PRAM) study subjects. Methods: Using data from a systematic literature search and an exploratory genome-wide association study conducted in a subset of the PRAM cohort, we followed a strict procedure to generate a ranked list of candidate genes. SNPs in the top 50 genes were genotyped in the full PRAM cohort (n = 103 cases with doc- tor-diagnosed atopic asthma at age 6, and n = 499 controls). Results: The literature search identified 251 prior risk genes from 469 publications. RAD50 (rs2706347) and PTPRE (rs10830196) revealed crude associations with asthma at a Bonferroni-corrected level of significance (p < 0.0011). IL4R (rs1801275), CCL5 (rs2280788), and TBXA2R (rs4523) revealed nominal significance (p < 0.05). When adjusted for race and gender, only rs2706347 in RAD50 remained significantly associated with asthma. SNPs in frequently replicated asthma risk genes, including TNF, IL13, ADAM33, TGFB1, and MS4A2, revealed no association. Conclusion:RAD50 may be a promising candidate asthma risk gene. Lack of evidence of highly reported polymorphisms in the present study highlights the genetic heterogeneity of asthma and emphasizes the need for robust replication of candidate genes.

© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: July 06, 2011
Issue release date: July 2011

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/HHE

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.