Background: Renal failure is associated with activation of inflammatory response, but the mechanisms behind this observation and potential anti-inflammatory strategies are yet to be defined. Endotoxin (ET) translocation from the intestinal lumen can potentially trigger systemic inflammatory response, and ET binding represents a potential anti-inflammatory strategy in renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ET-binding capacity of sevelamer carbonate in an animal model of renal failure. Material and Methods: Rats were 5/6 nephrectomized to induce uremia (U) and sham-operated rats were allocated to receive normal chow (controls) or a diet with 3% sevelamer carbonate added (+SC) for 60 days. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and ET were measured in plasma on days 7, 30 and 60 in all animals. Results: Renal failure induced an inflammatory response, since TNF-α levels were undetectable in all control animals in contrast to the uremic group (3.18 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.54 and 1.86 ± 0.47 pg/ml, respectively, on days 7, 30 and 60; p < 0.05 at all time points). Similarly, uremic rats presented an increase in ET levels (0.038 ± 0.007 EU/ml) when compared to sham-operated animals (0.008 ± 0.006 EU/ml; p < 0.05). During the study, TNF-α levels in U + SC rats were significantly lower compared with U-control animals (p < 0.05). Similarly, ET levels in U + SC rats were lower when compared with U-control rats (p < 0.005). Conclusion: In conclusion, induction of renal failure triggered inflammation and induced endotoxemia in this experimental model of chronic kidney disease, which were reduced by sevelamer treatment. This data suggests that sevelamer carbonate induces an anti-inflammatory effect in parallel to a reduction in ET.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.