Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot Password? Reset your password

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login (Shibboleth)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Table of Contents
Vol. 74, No. 3-4, 2012
Issue release date: April 2013
Section title: Paper
Hum Hered 2012;74:205-214

Does Accounting for Gene-Environment Interactions Help Uncover Association between Rare Variants and Complex Diseases?

Kazma R. · Cardin N.J. · Witte J.S.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, Calif., USA
email Corresponding Author

John S. Witte, PhD

MC 3110, UCSF, Helen Diller Family Cancer Research Building

1450 3rd Street, PO Box 589001

San Francisco, CA 94158-9001 (USA)

E-Mail WitteJ@humgen.ucsf.edu

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Objective: To determine whether accounting for gene-environment (G×E) interactions improves the power to detect associations between rare variants and a disease, we have extended three statistical methods and compared their power under various simulated disease models. Methods: To test for association of a group of rare variants with a disease, Min-P uses the lowest p value within the group of variants, CAST (Cohort Allelic Sums Test) uses an indicator variable to quantify the rare alleles within the group of variants, and SKAT (Sequence Kernel Association Test) uses a logistic regression based on kernel machine. For each method, we incorporate a term for the G×E interaction and test for association and interaction jointly. Results: When testing for disease association with a set of rare variants, accounting for G×E interactions can improve power in specific situations (pure interaction or high proportion of causal variants interacting with the environment). However, the power of this approach can decrease, in particular in the presence of main genetic or environmental effects. Among the methods compared, the optimized and weighted SKAT performed best, whether to test for genetic association or to test it jointly with G×E interactions. Conclusion: This approach can be used in specific situations but is not appropriate for a primary analysis.

© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

Published online: April 11, 2013
Issue release date: April 2013

Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0001-5652 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0062 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/HHE

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.