Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 103, No. 4, 2013
Issue release date: May 2013
Section title: Consensus Guidelines
Neonatology 2013;103:353-368
(DOI:10.1159/000349928)

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Infants - 2013 Update

Sweet D.G. · Carnielli V. · Greisen G. · Hallman M. · Ozek E. · Plavka R. · Saugstad O.D. · Simeoni U. · Speer C.P. · Vento M. · Halliday H.L.
aRegional Neonatal Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital and bDepartment of Child Health, Royal Maternity Hospital, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; cDepartment of Neonatology, University Hospital Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; dDepartment of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; eDepartment of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; fDepartment of Pediatrics, Marmara University Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey; gDivision of Neonatology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Faculty Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; hDepartment of Pediatric Research, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; iPôle de Néonatologie, Hôpital de la Conception, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France; jDepartment of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; kNeonatal Research Unit, Health Research Institute La Fe, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Consensus Guidelines

Published online: 5/31/2013

Number of Print Pages: 16
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 1661-7800 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-7819 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEO

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the perinatal management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), controversies still exist. We report updated recommendations of a European Panel of expert neonatologists who developed consensus guidelines after critical examination of the most up-to-date evidence in 2007 and 2010. This second update of the guidelines is based upon published evidence up to the end of 2012. Strong evidence exists for the role of antenatal steroids in RDS prevention, but it is still not clear if the benefit of repeated courses on respiratory outcomes outweighs the risk of adverse outcomes in the short and long term. Many practices involved in preterm neonatal stabilization at birth are not evidence based, including oxygen administration and positive pressure lung inflation, and they may at times be harmful. Surfactant replacement therapy is crucial in the management of RDS but the best preparation, optimal dose and timing of administration at different gestations is not completely clear. In addition, use of very early continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has altered the indications for prophylactic surfactant administration. Respiratory support in the form of mechanical ventilation may be lifesaving but can cause lung injury, and protocols should be directed at avoiding mechanical ventilation where possible by using non-invasive respiratory support such as CPAP. For babies with RDS to have best outcomes, it is essential that they have optimal supportive care, including maintenance of normal body temperature, proper fluid management, good nutritional support, appropriate management of the ductus arteriosus and support of the circulation to maintain adequate tissue perfusion.


  

Author Contacts

David G. Sweet, MD, FRCPCH
Regional Neonatal Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital
Grosvenor Road
Belfast BT12 6BB (UK)
E-Mail david.sweet@belfasttrust.hscni.net

  

Article Information

Published online: May 31, 2013
Number of Print Pages : 16
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 4, Number of References : 164

  

Publication Details

Neonatology (Fetal and Neonatal Research)

Vol. 103, No. 4, Year 2013 (Cover Date: May 2013)

Journal Editor: Halliday H.L. (Belfast), Speer C.P. (Würzburg)
ISSN: 1661-7800 (Print), eISSN: 1661-7819 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEO


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Consensus Guidelines

Published online: 5/31/2013

Number of Print Pages: 16
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 1661-7800 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-7819 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEO


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.