Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomesBurt D.W.
Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian (United Kingdom)
The origin of avian microchromosomes has long been the subject of much speculation and debate. Microchromosomes are a universal characteristic of all avian species and many reptilian karyotypes. The typical avian karyotype contains about 40 pairs of chromosomes and usually 30 pairs of small to tiny microchromosomes. This characteristic karyotype probably evolved 100–250 million years ago. Once the microchromosomes were thought to be a non-essential component of the avian genome. Recent work has shown that even though these chromosomes represent only 25% of the genome; they encode 50% of the genes. Contrary to popular belief, microchromosomes are present in a wide range of vertebrate classes, spanning 400–450 million years of evolutionary history. In this paper, comparative gene mapping between the genomes of chicken, human, mouse and zebrafish, has been used to investigate the origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes during this period. This analysis reveals evidence for four ancient syntenies conserved in fish, birds and mammals for over 400 million years. More than half, if not all, microchromosomes may represent ancestral syntenies and at least ten avian microchromosomes are the product of chromosome fission. Birds have one of the smallest genomes of any terrestrial vertebrate. This is likely to be the product of an evolutionary process that minimizes the DNA content (mostly through the number of repeats) and maximizes the recombination rate of microchromosomes. Through this process the properties (GC content, DNA and repeat content, gene density and recombination rate) of microchromosomes and macrochromosomes have diverged to create distinct chromosome types. An ancestral genome for birds likely had a small genome, low in repeats and a karyotype with microchromosomes. A “Fission–Fusion Model” of microchromosome evolution based on chromosome rearrangement and minimization of repeat content is discussed.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Request reprints from Dr. David William Burt
Department of Genomics and Bioinformatics, Roslin Institute,
Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS (UK)
telephone: +44-131-527-4200; fax: +44-131-440-0434
This article is dedicated to Professor Karl Fredga to commemorate his retirement and lifelong cytogenetic research activities.
Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).
Received: Received 14 March 2002;
manuscript accepted 4 April 2002.
Number of Print Pages : 16
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 97
Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Formerly ‘Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics’
Vol. 96, No. 1-4, Year 2002 (Cover Date: 2002)
Journal Editor: H.P. Klinger, Bronx, N.Y.; M. Schmid, Würzburg
ISSN: 1424–8581 (print), 1424–859X (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/journals/cgr