Accuracy of Clinical Diagnostic Methods of Threatened AbortionYip S.-K. · Sahota D. · Cheung L.-P. · Lam P. · Haines C.J. · Chung T.K.-H.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Objective: To examine the accuracy of clinical diagnostic methods in assessing vaginal bleeding in pregnant women before 28 weeks’ gestation. Methods: 772 consecutive women who presented with threatened abortion before 28 weeks’ gestation were studied. Structured history and physical examination were performed on each woman as initial clinical assessment. This was followed by transvaginal sonography to determine the status of pregnancy. The accuracy of diagnoses at different clinical stages (history, physical examination, and transvaginal sonography) relative to the final diagnosis was compared using the kappa coefficient (ĸ). Results: Clinicians were unable to accurately diagnose or predict the status of the pregnancy from history alone (ĸ = 0.33; 95% CI 0.28, 0.38) or after physical examination (ĸ = 0.57; 95% CI 0.52, 0.62). Transvaginal sonography led to an accurate diagnosis of pregnancy status (ĸ = 0.96; 95% CI 0.95, 0.98) in most cases, except where an ectopic pregnancy existed. Absence of abdominal tenderness (p = 0.04), cervical excitation (p = 0.02), and incorrect identification of retained products of conception on transvaginal sonography (p = 0.01) were features of missed ectopic pregnancy. Conclusions: The clinical assessment of threatened abortion by history and physical examination is unreliable in most cases. The diagnostic accuracy is improved by the addition of transvaginal sonography. Even with the help of transvaginal sonography, a small proportion of ectopic pregnancies will be missed.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.