Changes in the intensity of repeated, ignored sounds elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN) brain response which reflects preattentive detection of the change. It is generally assumed that the MMN in response to intensity changes reflects a memory-based comparison mechanism rather than being due to differential states of refractoriness of intensity-specific cortical neurons. In the present study, an experimental protocol consisting of 4 oddball blocks and 1 control block was used in order to separate memory-comparison-related effects from refractoriness-related ones. This design allowed an assessment of intensity MMN using physically identical stimuli with equal probability of occurrence in separate blocks, while avoiding contamination by refractoriness. Results were consistent with an MMN in response to intensity change that reflects genuine memory-based comparison.
BioCog – Cognitive and Biological Psychology
Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Universität Leipzig, Seeburgstrasse 14–20
DE–04301 Leipzig (Germany)
Tel. +49 341 97 35 907, Fax +49 341 97 35 969, E-Mail firstname.lastname@example.org
Received: April 8, 2003
Accepted after revision: June 16, 2003
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 5, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 27
Audiology & Neuro-Otology (Basic Research and Clinical Applications)
Vol. 8, No. 6, Year 2003 (Cover Date: November-December 2003)
Journal Editor: Manfried Hoke, Münster, Germany
ISSN: 1420–3030 (print), 1421–9700 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/aud
Article / Publication Details
Published online: 10/24/2003
Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 1420-3030 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9700 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/AUD
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.