Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 218, No. 1, 2004
Issue release date: January–February 2004
Section title: Original Paper
Ophthalmologica 2004;218:26–30
(DOI:10.1159/000074563)

Visual Function, Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction after Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparative Study

Mozaffarieh M. · Krepler K. · Heinzl H. · Sacu S. · Wedrich A.
Departments of aOphthalmology and bMedical Computer Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: 5/15/2003
Accepted: 6/6/2003
Published online: 12/22/2003
Issue release date: January–February 2004

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OPH

Abstract

Purpose: To compare visual acuity, functional visual performance (VF-14), quality of life (QOL) gain (VF-14 gain) and patient satisfaction in a series of patients undergoing common types of ophthalmic surgery. Method: In a prospective trial, the VF-14 QOL questionnaire was administered to 100 patients who underwent surgery by one surgeon between May 2001 and April 2002. The following surgeries were compared: (1) cataract surgery (non-diabetic patients), (2) cataract surgery (diabetic patients), (3) retinal detachment cryo-buckle procedure, (4) pars plana vitrectomy, (5) silicone oil removal. VF-14 questionnaire responses, visual function and clinical data of all patients were recorded pre-operatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: In comparison to vitreoretinal surgery, patients who underwent cataract surgery achieved higher VF-14 scores and required less time to recover from the procedure (1 month). The QOL gain (VF-14 gain) was significantly higher in patients who had undergone retinal detachment surgery and vitrectomy (p < 0.0001). The lowest QOL gain was registered in diabetic patients after cataract surgery. Patients with pre-existing eye disease, including patients with improved visual acuity, were least satisfied with the final outcome of surgery. Conclusions: The highest VF-14 score was achieved by patients with no pre-existing ocular disease, who had undergone cataract surgery. The QOL gain was greater in patients with severer initial ocular conditions. Better patient satisfaction can be achieved in patients with pre-existing eye disease by improving pre-operative patient education.


  

Author Contacts

Andreas Wedrich, MD
Department of Ophthalmology
University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18–20
AT–1090 Vienna (Austria)
Tel. +43 1 40400 7940, Fax +43 1 40400 7932, E-Mail wedrich@akh-wien.ac.at

  

Article Information

Received: May 15, 2003
Accepted: June 6, 2003
Number of Print Pages : 5
Number of Figures : 2, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 24

  

Publication Details

Ophthalmologica (International Journal of Ophthalmology)
Founded 1899 as ‘Zeitschrift für Augenheilkunde’ by H. Kuhnt and J. von Michel

Vol. 218, No. 1, Year 2004 (Cover Date: January-February 2004)

Journal Editor: Ch. Ohrloff, Frankfurt a.M.
ISSN: 0030–3755 (print), 1423–0267 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/oph


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: 5/15/2003
Accepted: 6/6/2003
Published online: 12/22/2003
Issue release date: January–February 2004

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OPH


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.