Central Effects of Estrogens
Dopamine Transporter as a Marker of Neuroprotection in Methamphetamine-Lesioned Mice Treated Acutely with EstradiolD’Astous M.a · Gajjar T.M.b · Dluzen D.E.b · Di Paolo T.a
aMolecular Endocrinology and Oncology Research Center, Laval University Medical Center, CHUL, and Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec City, Que., Canada; bDepartment of Anatomy, Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Our laboratories have shown the positive effect of estradiol on 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine- and methamphetamine (MA)-induced striatal dopamine (DA) depletion. Most studies on E neuroprotection use chronic administration of the steroid to evaluate its beneficial effect. In the present report, we investigated the neuroprotective potential of 17β-estradiol-3-benzoate (E) under acute conditions when administered 24, 12 or 0.5 h before MA. The effects of E on striatal DA and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) contents, and DA transporter (DAT) protein and mRNA were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography, autoradiography and in situ hybridization, respectively. We observed neuroprotection with an acute dose of E, and also that protection presents a different time course for each dopaminergic marker. DAT mRNA responded more quickly to E than its protein (at 0.5 h vs. 24 h). Also, E treatment 12 h prior to MA resulted in ‘normal’ (equal to control) DA content, while DAT protein was still decreased as compared to control values. These different responses for each marker may represent different mechanisms of action of E (genomic versus nongenomic). Since most experimental studies use DA content as the sole indicator of nigrostriatal toxicity and examine a single time point following chronic E administration, the present results demonstrate the importance of evaluating differences in temporally dependent responses of DA, DAT protein and mRNA, to achieve a more comprehensive indication of the nigrostriatal state and the means by which E can function as a neuroprotectant in this system.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.