Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 67, No. 1, 2004
Issue release date: September 2004
Section title: Clinical Study
Oncology 2004;67:19–26
(DOI:10.1159/000080281)

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Markers in Peritoneal Lavage in Advanced Gastric Cancer

Yamamoto M.a · Baba H.a · Kakeji Y.b · Endo K.a · Ikeda Y.a · Toh Y.a · Kohnoe S.a · Okamura T.a · Maehara Y.b
aDepartment of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Kyushu Cancer Center and bDepartment of Surgery and Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Study

Received: 1/8/2004
Published online: 10/4/2004
Issue release date: September 2004

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0030-2414 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0232 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OCL

Abstract

Objective: Predicting peritoneal dissemination of cancer is very difficult whatever method of examination is used. Recently, a cytological examination of peritoneal lavage has been shown to be a feasible measure to predict an early state of peritoneal seeding. The predictive value of the levels of tumor markers in peritoneal lavage for peritoneal metastasis from gastric carcinoma was thus studied. Methods: In 229 patients gastric cancer tumor markers, CEA, CA 125, and CA 19-9, in peritoneal lavage were intraoperatively evaluated using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. Results: CEA in peritoneal lavage at a cutoff level of 0.5 ng/ml showed overall a higher sensitivity of 75.8% at a specificity of 90.8% for a diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination including cytologically positive peritoneal lavage [CY(+)] than CA 125 or CA 19-9 in peritoneal lavage. The CEA level in peritoneal lavage as well as both serosal invasion and the CA 125 level in peritoneal lavage were significant factors for the prediction of peritoneal dissemination including CY(+) with a relative risk of 6.6, 14.1 and 9.4. In patients undergoing curative operations, the recurrence rate for peritoneal dissemination and liver metastasis in cases with CEA levels in peritoneal lavage of ≧0.5 ng/ml was significantly higher than that in cases with CEA levels of <0.5 ng/ml (p < 0.0001, p < 0.002). Conclusions: These finding suggest that the CEA level in peritoneal lavage is thus considered to be a predictor of peritoneal dissemination including CY(+).

© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Study

Received: 1/8/2004
Published online: 10/4/2004
Issue release date: September 2004

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0030-2414 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0232 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OCL


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.