Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 73, No. 6, 2004
Issue release date: November–December 2004
Section title: Clinical Note
Psychother Psychosom 2004;73:386–390
(DOI:10.1159/000080393)

Diagnosing ICD-10 Depressive Episodes: Superior Criterion Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire

Löwe B. · Gräfe K. · Zipfel S. · Witte S. · Loerch B. · Herzog W.
aRegenstrief Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind., USA; bDepartment of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Medical Hospital, cDepartment of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty, Heidelberg, and dDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Note

Published online: 10/15/2004

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0033-3190 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0348 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PPS

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing and monitoring depression in primary care remains an issue of significant public health concern. Clinicians and researchers need to know if any one screening instrument is superior to the others in diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes. This study aimed to examine the criterion validity for diagnosing ICD-10 depressive episodes of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) in comparison with 2 well-established instruments, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the WHO Well-Being Index 5 (WBI-5). Methods: Five hundred and one medical outpatients completed the questionnaires and had a clinical interview. The presence of a depressive episode was determined with the International Diagnostic Checklists (IDCL) for ICD-10 as the criterion standard. Coefficient kappa (ĸ), sensitivities and specificities were calculated and a statistical comparison of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves was performed. Results: Diagnostic agreement between the questionnaires and the IDCL was moderate (ĸ = 0.34–0.56), with the highest values for the PHQ. While all 3 questionnaires had reasonable sensitivity and specificity, the operating characteristics for the PHQ were significantly superior to both the HADS and the WBI-5 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Any of the 3 screening instruments can be recommended for clinical use. However, this is the first comparative study to demonstrate the diagnostic advantage of a particular depression-screening instrument using the ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. The superior criterion validity of the PHQ is likely attributable to its closer representation of the current concept of depressive disorders.


  

Author Contacts

Bernd Löwe, MD, PhD
Department of General Internal and Psychosomatic Medicine
Heidelberg University Medical Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410
DE–69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
Tel. +49 6221 568999, Fax +49 6221 565749, E-Mail bernd.loewe@med.uni-heidelberg.de

  

Article Information

Number of Print Pages : 5
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 18

  

Publication Details

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Vol. 73, No. 6, Year 2004 (Cover Date: November-December 2004)

Journal Editor: G.A. Fava, Bologna
ISSN: 0033–3190 (print), 1423–0348 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/pps


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Note

Published online: 10/15/2004

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0033-3190 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0348 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PPS


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.