Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 4, No. 6, 2004
Issue release date: 2004
Section title: Review
Pancreatology 2004;4:561–566
(DOI:10.1159/000082181)

The Role of Extended Resection in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Is There Good Evidence-Based Justification?

Hartel M. · Wente M.N. · Di Sebastiano P. · Friess H. · Büchler M.W.
Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review

Published online: 11/15/2004

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1424-3903 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-3911 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PAN

Abstract

Thus far, there are no studies concerning the radicality of pancreaticoduodenectomy which, in well-performed, randomized-controlled trials employing high standards of evidence-based medicine, show a benefit over extended lymphadenectomy. The results of the only two prospective randomized studies are not comparable and both are underpowered (level of evidence Ib). Therefore, it is still unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma improves outcome. Only one study suggests a positive tendency toward increased survival rates in node-positive patients. Extended approaches including additional venous resection can be performed without a rise in the morbidity and mortality rates of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. In the future appropriately powered randomized trials of standard vs. extended resections may show the benefit of extended surgical resections. In addition, well powered trials of postoperative adjuvant therapies or preoperative neoadjuvant strategies together with surgical resections may identify more effective combinations showing a survival benefit in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.


  

Author Contacts

Helmut Friess, MD
Department of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg
Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, DE–69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
Tel. +49 6221 56 4860, Fax +49 6221 56 6903
E-Mail helmut_friess@med.uni-heidelberg.de

  

Article Information

Published online: November 15, 2004
Number of Print Pages : 6
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 36

  

Publication Details

Pancreatology

Vol. 4, No. 6, Year 2004 (Cover Date: 2004)

Journal Editor: M.V. Singer, Mannheim; C.W. Imrie, Glasgow
ISSN: 1424–3903 (Print), eISSN: 1424–3911 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/pan


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Review

Published online: 11/15/2004

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1424-3903 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-3911 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PAN


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.