Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 50, No. 5, 2006
Issue release date: September 2006
Section title: Original Paper
Ann Nutr Metab 2006;50:450–460
(DOI:10.1159/000094781)

Comparison of Women’s Diet Assessed by FFQs and 24-Hour Recalls with and without Underreporters: Associations with Biomarkers

Olafsdottir A.S. · Thorsdottir I. · Gunnarsdottir I. · Thorgeirsdottir H. · Steingrimsdottir L.
aUnit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali – University Hospital & Department of Food Science, University of Iceland, and bPublic Health Institute of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: 11/1/2005
Accepted: 2/19/2006
Published online: 9/29/2006

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 7

ISSN: 0250-6807 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9697 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/ANM

Abstract

Background/Aims: Women’s diet can be especially difficult to assess, as women tend to underreport their intakes more often than men and are more likely to do so if they think they are overweight or obese. The aim was to compare two methods to assess women’s diet and how well they associate with biomarkers. The influence and frequency of underreporting was also investigated. Methods: Diet of 53 women was assessed by two 24-hour recalls and a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Blood was analyzed for retinol, β-carotene, vitamin C and serum ferritin, and 24-hour urine for nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Underreporting was evaluated with nitrogen excretion vs. intake, and energy intake vs. basal metabolic rate. Results: Energy percent (E%) from macronutrients was similar from FFQ and 24-hour recalls, but total intake was higher from 24-hour recalls (9,516 ± 2,080 vs. 8,183 ± 2,893 kJ, p < 0.01). Intakes of vitamin C and potassium from both methods correlated with their respective biomarkers (r = 0.316–0.393). Underreporters had higher body mass index (BMI) than others (27.7 ± 5.5 vs. 23.8 ± 3.7 kg/m2, p < 0.05). They reported lower E% total fat (32 ± 5 vs. 38 ± 6 E%, p < 0.01) and higher E% carbohydrate (49 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 7 E%, p < 0.05). Correlation between intake and biomarkers increased after exclusion of underreporters. Conclusion: For women, FFQ and 24-hour recalls give similar E% and most nutrients correlate, but FFQ gives lower intake. Underreporters have higher BMI and diminish the correlation between calculated intake and biomarkers. This has to be considered when intake data are associated with weight management, disease and lifestyle factors.


  

Author Contacts

Inga Thorsdottir
Unit for Nutrition Research, University of Iceland and Landspitali
University Hospital, Eiríksgata 29
IS–101 Reykjavik (Iceland)
Tel. +354 543 8414, Fax +354 543 4824, E-Mail ingathor@landspitali.is

  

Article Information

Received: November 1, 2005
Accepted: February 19, 2006
Published online: July 27, 2006
Number of Print Pages : 11
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 7, Number of References : 51

  

Publication Details

Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism (European Journal of Nutrition, Metabolic Diseases and Dietetics)

Vol. 50, No. 5, Year 2006 (Cover Date: September 2006)

Journal Editor: Elmadfa, I. (Vienna)
ISSN: 0250–6807 (print), 1421–9697 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/ANM


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: 11/1/2005
Accepted: 2/19/2006
Published online: 9/29/2006

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 7

ISSN: 0250-6807 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9697 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/ANM


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.