Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 116, No. 1-2, 2007
Issue release date: January 2007
Section title: Original Article
Cytogenet Genome Res 116:53–60 (2007)
(DOI:10.1159/000097417)

Chromosomal speciation of humans and chimpanzees revisited: studies of DNA divergence within inverted regions

Szamalek J.M.a · Cooper D.N.b · Hoegel J.a · Hameister H.a · Kehrer-Sawatzki H.a
aDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm (Germany) bInstitute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff (UK)

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Published online: 2/2/2007
Issue release date: January 2007

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CGR

Abstract

The human and chimpanzee karyotypes are distinguishable in terms of nine pericentric inversions. According to the recombination suppression model of speciation, these inversions could have promoted the process of parapatric speciation between hominoid populations ancestral to chimpanzees and humans. Were recombination suppression to have occurred in inversion heterozygotes, gene flow would have been reduced, resulting in the accumulation of genetic incompatibilities leading to reproductive isolation and eventual speciation. In an attempt to detect the molecular signature of such events, the sequence divergence of non-coding DNA was compared between humans and chimpanzees. Precise knowledge of the locations of the inversion breakpoints permitted accurate discrimination between inverted and non-inverted regions. Contrary to the predictions of the recombination suppression model, sequence divergence was found to be lower in inverted chromosomal regions as compared to non-inverted regions, albeit with borderline statistical significance. Thus, no signature of recombination suppression resulting from inversion heterozygosity appears to be detectable by analysis of extant human and chimpanzee non-coding DNA. The precise delineation of the inversion breakpoints may nevertheless still prove helpful in identifying potential speciation-relevant genes within the inverted regions.

© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


  

Author Contacts

Request reprints from Dr. Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Department of Human Genetics, University of Ulm
Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm (Germany)
telephone: +49 731 5002 3416; fax: +49 731 5002 3438
e-mail: hildegard.kehrer-sawatzki@uni-ulm.de

  

Article Information

The research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG KE 724/2–1).

Manuscript received: 17 July 2006
Accepted in revised form for publication by M. Schmid,: 10 August 2006.
Number of Print Pages : 8
Number of Figures : 1, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 45

  

Publication Details

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Vol. 116, No. 1-2, Year 2007 (Cover Date: January 2007)

Journal Editor: Schmid, M. (Würzburg)
ISSN: 1424–8581 (print), 1424–859X (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CGR


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Published online: 2/2/2007
Issue release date: January 2007

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/CGR


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.