Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 22, No. 4, 2007
Issue release date: June 2007
Fetal Diagn Ther 2007;22:277–281

The Fetal Dandy Walker Complex: Associated Anomalies, Perinatal Outcome and Postnatal Imaging

Harper T. · Fordham L.A. · Wolfe H.M.
Departments of aObstetrics and Gynecology and bRadiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Objective: This study compares the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound with postnatal imaging and evaluates for associated fetal anomalies and their impact on immediate neonatal outcome in fetal Dandy Walker complex (DWC). Methods: Cases of fetal DWC diagnosed in a single ultrasound unit from January 2000 through July 2004 were reviewed for associated fetal anomalies, fetal karyotype, immediate neonatal outcome and postnatal head imaging. Results: A total of 55 fetuses with DWC were identified. Of liveborn cases, postnatal imaging confirmed prenatal intracranial findings in 50% of Dandy Walker variant (DWV) and 100% of Dandy Walker malformation (DWM), with additional central nervous system findings noted in 21% of all cases. Additional fetal anomalies were seen in 26/40 (65%) cases of DWV and 15/15 (100%) cases of DWM. Immediate neonatal survival was predicted by karyotype and associated fetal anomalies. Conclusion: The sonographic diagnosis of fetal DWM is accurate. Significant discrepancies exist in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of DWV. Comprehensive fetal ultrasound and karyotype should be offered for all fetuses with DWC. Postnatal imaging should be performed on all fetal DWC.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Cornford E, Twining P: The Dandy-Walker syndrome: the value of antenatal diagnosis. Clin Radiol 1992;45:172–174.
  2. Nyberg DA, Pretorius DH, Pilu G: Diagnostic Imaging of Fetal Anomalies. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003, pp 237–243.
  3. Estroff JA, Scott MR, Benacerraf BR: Dandy-Walker variant: prenatal sonographic features and clinical outcome. Radiology 1992;185:755–758.
  4. Castillo MSM: Imaging of the Pediatric Head, Neck and Spine. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
  5. Has R, Ermis H, Yuksel A, et al: Dandy-Walker malformation: a review of 78 cases diagnosed by prenatal sonography. Fetal Diagn Ther 2004;19:342–347.
  6. Ecker JL, Shipp TD, Bromley B, Benacerraf B: The sonographic diagnosis of Dandy-Walker and Dandy-Walker variant: associated findings and outcomes. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:328–332.
  7. Nyberg DA, Mahony BS, Hegge FN, Hickok D, Luthy DA, Kapur R: Enlarged cisterna magna and the Dandy-Walker malformation: factors associated with chromosome abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:436–442.
  8. Chang MC, Russell SA, Callen PW, Filly RA, Goldstein RB: Sonographic detection of inferior vermian agenesis in Dandy-Walker malformations: prognostic implications. Radiology 1994;193:765–770.
  9. Bromley B, Nadel AS, Pauker S, Estroff JA, Benacerraf BR: Closure of the cerebellar vermis: evaluation with second trimester US. Radiology 1994;193:761–763.
  10. Carroll SG, Porter H, Abdel-Fattah S, Kyle PM, Soothill PW: Correlation of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and pathologic findings in fetal brain abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:149–153.
  11. Blaicher W, Prayer D, Bernaschek G: Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the assessment of the fetal central nervous system. J Perinat Med 2003;31:459–468.
  12. Guo WY, Chang CY, Ho DM, et al: A comparative MR and pathological study on fetal CNS disorders. Childs Nerv Syst 2001;17:512–518.
  13. Adamsbaum C, Moutard ML, Andre C, et al: MRI of the fetal posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:124–140.
  14. D’Ercole C, Girard N, Boubli L, et al: Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cerebral abnormalities by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;50:177–184.
  15. Blaicher W, Bernaschek G, Deutinger J, Messerschmidt A, Schindler E, Prayer D: Fetal and early postnatal magnetic resonance imaging – is there a difference? J Perinat Med 2004;32:53–57.
  16. Resta M, Greco P, D’Addario V, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy: study of fetal cerebral malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:7–20.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50