Platybasia and Basilar InvaginationPearce J.M.S.
Emeritus Consultant Neurologist, Department of Neurology, Hull Royal Infirmary and Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK Corresponding Author
304 Beverley Road Anlaby, East Yorks HU10 7BG (UK)
Descriptions of the flattening (platybasia) of the skull base and the upward displacement(impression) of the basilar and condylar portions of the occipitalbone by the upper cervical spine date to the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Anatomical measurements to display these abnormalities were begun in 1865, but the full clinical significance was not appreciated until Homen’s work in 1901. Subsequent refinement of radiology facilitated diagnosis and the later advent of surgical treatment.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
According to Spillane et al.  one of the first accounts of basilar invagination was that of Anders Adolph Retzius (1796–1860) and Frederik Theodor Berg (1806–1887) in 1855. It is found in the first section of Retzius’s book Impressio baseos cranii ex atrophia adiposa (cerea), part 4 (fig. 1). But earlier, in 1790, Ackermann is said to have described basilar invagination and a small posterior fossa in cretins from the Alps in 1790 .
Rokitansky first described the related occipitalisation of the atlas in 1844. Virchow  coined the term ‘platybasia’ to describe an abnormal flattening of the skull base, a defect which heattributed to abnormal bone development. However, in 1876 he reported the physical anthropology of the Germans with special consideration of the Frisians showing that basilar invagination was occasionally seen in association with platybasia . In additionto flattening of the base of the skull, there was upward displacement(impression) of the basilar and condylar portions of the occipitalbone, which caused infolding, or impression of the foramenmagnum, reduction of the posterior fossa, and consequentprotrusion of the upper cervical spine into the anterior brainstem,with neurologicalsigns. In 1865, Boogaard  extensively examinedplatybasia by using angular measurementsin conjunction with his studies on basilar invagination. Over 50 years passed before Schuller , in 1911, established the radiological diagnosis, which was refined by Chamberlain  in 1939 and by other radiologists (table 1). However, no distinctive or detailed clinicopathological correlations were described.
Basilar invagination, the commonest malformation of the craniocervical junction , is a well recognised cause of neck pain, cough headache, lower cranial nerve palsies, corticospinal signs, hydrocephalus, cerebellar dysfunction, syringomyelia and syringobulbia, as first reported by Homen [10 ]in 1901. A short neck and flat skull base are often visible on inspection. Hypernasal speech, i.e. velopharyngeal insufficiency, with or without palatal clefts is an occasional clue. The neurologicalsigns  are notably variable. It is associated with other malformations of the notochord and craniovertebral junction, such as occipitalisation of the atlas, Klippel-Feil anomaly, Chiari type I malformation and syringomyelia. The association of platybasia, occipitalisation of the atlas and fusion of cervical vertebrae in those with and without a Chiari malformation indicates a common developmental origin .
Occasional familial cases are recorded. One family in whom at least 6 individuals spanning 3 generations had primary basilar invagination is reported in which the 32-year-old male proband had associated syringomyelia with neurological signs .
Secondary basilar invagination occurs in acquired bone diseases: Paget’s disease,osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta and localized bone destruction. Symptoms occur when the brainstem is compressed by the clivus or by the odontoid peg. About 80% of those with basilar impression have no associated Chiari malformation (group I); the remainder has both basilar impression and Chiari malformation (group II). The principal pathological characteristic is observed to be direct brainstem compression due to odontoid process indentation in group I and a reduction in posterior cranial fossa volume in group II. Altered CSF dynamics, pressure or traction on the brainstem and possibly impaired vertebrobasilar blood supply are possible mechanisms. When symptoms progress and threaten disability, treatment is by surgical decompression or by transoral odontoidectomy with reduction of the basilar impression and craniovertebral junction bony realignment, and atlanto-axial fixation [14, 15].
Anders Retzius and his equally famed son Gustaf both worked at the Karolinska Institute and both were accomplished anthropologists. Anders enrolled at Lund University in 1812 and studied medicine at both Lund and Copenhagen, graduating MD in 1818. He was appointed anatomist at the Karolinska Institute in 1824, becoming Professor of Anatomy in 1840. He executed many anatomical studies that enhanced contemporary descriptions of the teeth, skull, muscles and the nervous system. The retropubic space of Retzius is named after him. His anthropological work on the skull resulted in the classifications of skull types.
Following Robert Dunn’s mid 19th century text on the morphology of the skull , Anders Retzius noticed that in Sweden the Germans had narrow skulls, while the skulls of the Lapps were broad; he clarified these shapes mathematically by his cephalic index of breadth/length. He described 4 types: orthognathous dolichocephalic, orthognathous brachycephalic, prognathous dolichocephalic and prognathous brachycephalic. Though still used descriptively, his classification did not confirm distinct racial patterns since the various forms appear within every race.
His brilliance was widely acclaimed and reflected by election to many academic societies. He fathered an equally celebrated son, Magnus Gustaf Retzius (1842–1919), physician and anatomist who studied the histology of the basilar membrane of the inner ear, sense organs and nervous system and after whom the Retzius cells in the leech (Hirudo medicinalis) were named.
304 Beverley Road Anlaby, East Yorks HU10 7BG (UK)
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.