Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 117, No. 1-4, 2007
Issue release date: July 2007
Cytogenet Genome Res 117:213–220 (2007)

Characterization of the turkey MHC chromosome through genetic and physical mapping

Chaves L.D. · Krueth S.B. · Reed K.M.
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (USA)

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Previous studies in the chicken have identified a single microchromosome (GGA16) containing the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and two genetically unlinked MHC regions, MHC-B and MHC-Y. Chicken DNA sequence from these loci was used to develop PCR primers for amplification of homologous fragments from the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). PCR products were sequenced and overgo probes were designed to screen the CHORI 260 turkey BAC library. BAC clones corresponding to the turkey rDNA, MHC-B and MHC-Y were identified. BAC end and subclone sequencing confirmed identity and homology of the turkey BAC clones to the respective chicken loci. Based on subclone sequences, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) segregating within the UMN/NTBF mapping population were identified and genotyped. Analysis of SNP genotypes found the B and Y to be genetically unlinked in the turkey. Silver staining of metaphase chromosomes identified a single pair of microchromosomes with nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). Physical locations of the rDNA and MHC loci were determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of the BAC clones to metaphase chromosomes. FISH clearly positioned the rDNA distal to the Y locus on the q-arm of the MHC chromosome and the MHC-B on the p-arm. An internal telomere array on the MHC chromosome separates the B and Y loci.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Afanassieff M, Goto RM, Ha J, Sherman MA, Zhong L, et al: At least one class I gene in restriction fragment pattern-Y (Rfp-Y), the second MHC gene cluster in the chicken, is transcribed, polymorphic, and shows divergent specialization in antigen binding region. J Immunol 166:3324–3333 (2001).
  2. Ashley T, Ward DC: A ‘hot spot’ of recombination coincides with an interstitial telomeric sequence in the Armenian hamster. Cytogenet Cell Genet 62:169–171 (1993).
  3. Axelsson E, Webster MT, Smith NG, Burt DW, Ellegren H: Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes. Genome Res 15:120–125 (2005).
  4. Bloom SE, Bacon LD: Linkage of the major histocompatibility (B) complex and the nucleolar organizer in the chicken. Assignment to a microchromosome. J Hered 76:146–154 (1985).
  5. Briles WE, Goto RM, Auffray C, Miller MM: A polymorphic system related to but genetically independent of the chicken major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics 37:408–414 (1993).
  6. Chaves LD, Knutson TP, Krueth SB, Reed KM: Using the chicken genome sequence in the development and mapping of genetic markers in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). Anim Genet 37:130–138 (2006).
  7. Delany ME, Krupkin AB: Molecular characterization of ribosomal gene variation within and among NORs segregating in specialized populations of chicken. Genome 42:60–71 (1999).
  8. Delany ME, Gessaro TM, Rodrigue KM, Daniels LM: Chromosomal mapping of chicken mega-telomere arrays to GGA9, 16, 28 and W using a cytogenetic approach. Cytogenet Genome Res 117:54–63 (2007).
  9. Fillon V, Zoorob R, Yerle M, Auffray C, Vignal A: Mapping of the genetically independent chicken major histocompatibility complexes B@ and RFP-Y@ to the same microchromosome by two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 75:7–9 (1996).
  10. Garbe J, Da Y: Locusmap user manual Version 1.1. (Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 2003).
  11. Heath WR, Carbone FR: Cross-presentation in viral immunity and self-tolerance. Nat Rev Immunol 1:126–134 (2001).
  12. Howell WM, Black AD: Controlled silver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015 (1980).
  13. Kaufman J, Milne S, Gobel TW, Walker BA, Jacob JP, et al: The chicken B locus is a minimal essential major histocompatibility complex. Nature 401:923–925 (1999).
  14. Kelley J, Walter L, Trowsdale J: Comparative genomics of major histocompatibility complexes. Immunogenetics 56:683–695 (2005).
  15. Miller MM, Goto R, Bernot A, Zoorob R, Auffray C, et al: Two Mhc class I and two Mhc class II genes map to the chicken Rfp-Y system outside the B complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4397–4401 (1994).
  16. Miller MM, Goto RM, Taylor RL Jr, Zoorob R, Auffray C, et al: Assignment of Rfp-Y to the chicken major histocompatibility complex/NOR microchromosome and evidence for high- frequency recombination associated with the nucleolar organizer region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:3958–3962 (1996).
  17. Miller MM, Bacon LD, Hala K, Hunt HD, Ewald SJ, et al: Nomenclature for the chicken major histocompatibility (B and Y) complex. Immunogenetics 56:261–279 (2004).
  18. Reed KM, Chaves LD, Garbe JR, Da Y, Harry DE: Allelic variation of avian microsatellites in a new turkey population for genetic mapping. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:331–339 (2003).
  19. Reed KM, Chaves LD, Hall MK, Knutson TP, Harry DE: A comparative genetic map of the turkey genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 111:118–127 (2005).
  20. Reed KM, Sullivan LR, Foster LK, Chaves LD, Ponce de León FA: Assignment of linkage groups to turkey chromosome 1 (MGA1). Cytogenet Genome Res 115:176–178 (2006).
  21. Rodgers JR, Cook RG: MHC class Ib molecules bridge innate and acquired immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 5:459–471 (2005).
  22. Rogers S, Shaw I, Ross N, Nair V, Rothwell L, et al: Analysis of part of the chicken Rfp-Y region reveals two novel lectin genes, the first complete genomic sequence of a class I alpha-chain gene, a truncated class II beta-chain gene, and a large CR1 repeat. Immunogenetics 55:100–108 (2003).
  23. Romanov MN, Dodgson JB: Cross-species overgo hybridization and comparative physical mapping within avian genomes. Anim Genet 37:397–399 (2006).
  24. Ross MT, LaBrie S, McPherson J, Stanton VP: Screening large-insert libraries by hybridization; in Dracopoli NC, Haines JL, Korf BR, Moir DT, Morton CC, Seidman CE, Seidman JG, Smith DR (eds): Current Protocols in Human Genetics, pp 5.6.1–5.6.52 (John Wiley and Sons, New York 1999).
  25. Schook LB, Lamont SJ (eds): The Major Histocompatibility Complex Region of Domestic Animal Species. (CRC Press, Boca Raton 1996).
  26. Shiina T, Shimizu S, Hosomichi K, Kohara S, Watanabe S, et al: Comparative genomic analysis of two avian (quail and chicken) MHC regions. J Immunol 172:6751–6763 (2004).

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50