Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 64, No. 4, 2007
Issue release date: November 2007
Gynecol Obstet Invest 2007;64:175–179

Progressive Cervical Length Changes versus Single Cervical Length Measurement by Transvaginal Ultrasound for Prediction of Preterm Delivery

Dilek T.U.K. · Yazici G. · Gurbuz A. · Tasdelen B. · Gulhan S. · Dilek B. · Dilek S.
Departments of aObstetrics and Gynecology, bBiostatistics, cRadiology, Mersin University School of Medicine, and dDepartment of Radiology, Mersin State Hospital, Mersin, Turkey

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: To evaluate cervical length changes as predictors of preterm delivery. Methods: Two hundred and fifty-seven pregnant women underwent transvaginal ultrasound examination at 16 and 24 weeks of gestation. Cervical length was measured and the difference between the 2 measurements was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of cervical length and cervical length changes were calculated and these methods were compared by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Preterm delivery (before 37 weeks of gestation) occurred in 19 patients (7.4%). The mean cervical length was shorter in the preterm group, the area under the ROC curve for prediction of preterm delivery was 0.914, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 84.2% to predict preterm delivery with a false-positive rate of 18.5%, and the relative risk was 4.56 at the 34.3-mm cutoff value at 24 weeks of gestation. In contrast, a cervical length change on transvaginal ultrasound had a sensitivity of 73.3% to predict preterm delivery with a false-positive rate of 18.1%, and the relative risk was 4.08 at the 6.6-mm cutoff value. Conclusion: A single cervical length measurement obtained at 24 weeks of gestation can predict preterm delivery as accurately as cervical length change.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Creasy RK, DuBard MB, Davis RO, Entman SS, Iams JD, Cliver SP: A multicenter study of preterm birth weight and gestational age-specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:78–84.
  2. Lumley J: The epidemiology of preterm birth. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;7:477–498.
  3. Wen SW, Goldenberg RL, Cutter GR, Hoffman HJ, Cliver SP: Intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery: perinatal risk factors in an indigent population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:213–218.
  4. Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, Casal D, Shah KD, Thung S: Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991;325:669–674.
  5. Goldenberg RL, Thom E, Moawad AH, Johnson F, Roberts J, Caritis SN: The preterm prediction study: fetal fibronectin, bacterial vaginosis, and peripartum infection. NIHCD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:656–660.
  6. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pages G, Mendoza G: Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography. A new perspective. J Ultrasound Med 1995;14:719–724.
  7. Iams JD: Prediction and early detection of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:402–412.
  8. Iams JD, Paraskos J, Landon MB, Teteris JN, Johnson FF: Cervical sonography in preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:40–46.
  9. Crane JM, Van Den Hof M, Armson BA, Liston R: Transvaginal ultrasound in the prediction of preterm delivery: singleton and twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:357–363.
  10. Tongsong T, Kamprapanth P, Srisomboon J, Wanapirak C, Piyamongkol W, Sirichotiyakul S: Single transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length early in the third trimester as a predictor of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:184–187.
  11. Taipale P, Hiilesmaa V: Sonographic measurement of uterine cervix at 18–22 weeks’ gestation and the risk of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:902–907.
  12. Honest H, Bachmann LM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J: Accuracy of cervical transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm birth: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;22:305–322.
  13. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Malagrida L, Guidicelli Y, Perdu M, Houssin I, Safe-Femme, Nisand I: Evaluating the risk of preterm delivery: a comparison of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:196–199.
  14. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, Thom E, McNellis D, Copper RL, Johnson F, Roberts JM: The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med 1996;334:567–572.
  15. Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ: Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:161–166.
  16. Guzman ER, Walters C, Ananth CV, O’Reilly-Green C, Benito CW, Palermo A, Vintzelos AM: A comparison of sonographic cervical parameters in predicting spontaneous preterm birth in high-risk singleton gestations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:204–210.
  17. Leitich H, Braunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P: Cervical length and dilatation of the internal cervical os detected by vaginal ultrasonography as markers for preterm delivery: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1465–1472.
  18. Berghella V, Bega G, Tolose JE, Berghella M: Ultrasound assessment of the cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:947–962.
  19. Berghella V, Tolosa JE, Kuhlman K, WeinerS, Bolognese RJ, Wapner RJ: Cervical ultrasonography compared with manual examination as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:723–730.
  20. Rozenberg P, Gillet A, Ville Y: Transvaginal sonographic examination of the cervix in asymptomatic pregnant women: review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:302–311.
  21. Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U: Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery. J Clin Ultrasound 2004;32:225–230.
  22. Heath VC, Southhall TR, Souka AP, Elisseou A, Nicolaides KH: Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12:312–317.
  23. Hoesli IM, Surbek DV, Tercanlı S, Holzgreve W: Three dimensional volume measurement of the cervix during pregnancy compared to conventional 2D-sonography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;64:115–119.
  24. Hibbard JU, Tart M, Moawad AT: Cervical length at 16–22 weeks’ gestation and risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:972–978.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50