Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 70, No. 2, 2008
Issue release date: April 2008

Multiplanar Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Frontal Recess Region in Chinese Subjects without Frontal Sinus Disease Symptoms

Han D. · Zhang L. · Ge W. · Tao J. · Xian J. · Zhou B.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of frontal-ethmoidal cells and to evaluate variation in the superior attachment of the uncinate process in Chinese subjects. 202 normal Chinese subjects (404 sides) underwent spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction images were evaluated. Agger nasi cells showed a prevalence of 94.1%. Of all the frontal cells identified in 159 sides (39.6%) of frontal recesses, the prevalence of type I, type II and type III cells was 24.4, 7.0 and 8.2%, respectively. Suprabullar, frontal bullar and interfrontal septal cells were identified in 148 sides (36.6%), 36 sides (9.0%) and 25 subjects (12.4%), respectively. 244 uncinate processes (60.4%) had 1 superior attachment and the remainder (39.6%) had 2 superior attachments. The prevalence of terminal recesses was 89.1%. Our results characterized normal frontal recess pneumatization patterns in Chinese subjects. That, together with variation in the superior attachment of the uncinate process, emphasized the role of agger nasi cells and the uncinate process in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Kennedy DW, Josephson JS, Zinreich SJ, et al: Endoscopic sinus surgery for mucoceles: a viable alternative. Laryngoscope 1989;99:885–895.
  2. Schäfer SD, Close LG: Endoscopic management of frontal sinus disease. Laryngoscope 1990;100:155–160.

    External Resources

  3. Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, et al: Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology 1987;163:769–775.
  4. Zinreich SJ: Paranasal sinus imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:863–868.
  5. Zinreich SJ: Progress in sinonasal imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2006;196:61–65.

    External Resources

  6. Cohen NA, Kennedy DW: Endoscopic sinus surgery: where we are and where we’re going. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:32–38.
  7. Wormald PJ: Surgery of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. Rhinology 2005;43:82–85.
  8. Wormald PJ: The agger nasi cell: the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:497–507.
  9. Kim KS, Kim HU, Chung IH, et al: Surgical anatomy of the nasofrontal duct: anatomical and computed tomographic analysis. Laryngoscope 2001;111:603–608.
  10. Landsberg R, Friedman M: A computer-assisted anatomical study of the nasofrontal region. Laryngoscope 2001;111:2125–2130.
  11. Friedman M, Bliznikas D, Vidyasagar R, et al: Frontal sinus surgery 2004: update of clinical anatomy and surgical techniques. Oper Techn Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;15:23–31.

    External Resources

  12. Turgut S, Ercan I, Sayin I, et al: The relationship between frontal sinusitis and localization of the frontal sinus outflow tract: a computer-assisted anatomical and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:518–522.
  13. Meyer TK, Kocak M, Smith MM, et al: Coronal computed tomography analysis of frontal cells. Am J Rhinol 2003;17:163–168.
  14. Lee WT, Kuhn FA, Citardi MJ: 3D computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess anatomy in patients without frontal sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:164–173.
  15. Del Gaudio JM, Hudgins PA, Venkatraman G, et al: Multiplanar computed tomographic analysis of frontal recess cells: effect on frontal isthmus size and frontal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:230–235.
  16. Cho JH, Citardi MJ, Lee WT, et al: Comparison of frontal pneumatization patterns between Koreans and Caucasians. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:780–786.
  17. Stammberger HR, Kennedy DW; Anatomic Terminology Group: Paranasal sinuses: anatomic terminology and nomenclature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;167:7–16.
  18. Wormald PJ: The axillary flap approach to the frontal recess. Laryngoscope 2002;112:494–499.
  19. Van Alyea OE: Ethmoid labyrinth: anatomic study with consideration of the clinical significance of its structural characteristics. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1939;29: 881–902.
  20. Bolger WE, Butzin CA, Parsons DS: Paranasal sinus bony anatomic variations and mucosal abnormalities: CT analysis for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1991;101:56–64.
  21. Zhang L, Han D, Ge W, et al: Anatomical and computed tomographic analysis of the interaction between the uncinate process and the agger nasi Cell. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:845–852.
  22. Schick B, Ibing R, Brors D, et al: Long-term study of endonasal duraplasty and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:142–147.
  23. Wormald PJ: Three-dimensional building block approach to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 2006;17:2–5.

    External Resources



Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50