Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 59, No. 5, 2008
Issue release date: April 2008
Eur Neurol 2008;59:267–271

Errors in EEG Interpretation and Misdiagnosis of Epilepsy

Which EEG Patterns Are Overread?

Benbadis S.R. · Lin K.
aComprehensive Epilepsy Program, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of South Florida and Tampa General Hospital, and bUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Fla., USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background/Aims: The overinterpretation of EEGs is common and is an important contributor to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. We reviewed our experience in order to clarify which EEG patterns are commonly overread as epileptiform. Methods: We identified patients who were seen at our epilepsy clinic and were ultimately diagnosed as having conditions other than epilepsy. We selected those who had previously had an EEG read as showing epileptiform discharges and whose EEG was available for our own re-review. Results: 37 patients met the above criteria. Eventual diagnoses were psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (10), syncope (7), other miscellaneous diagnoses (5) and unexplained nonspecific symptoms (15). None of the EEGs had epileptiform discharges. The descriptions of the abnormalities included ‘temporal sharp waves’ in 30, ‘frontal sharp waves’ in 2 and ‘generalized spike-wave complexes’ in 2. Three had no reports available to identify the alleged abnormality. The benign patterns mistaken for temporal (30) and frontal (2) sharp waves were simple fluctuations of background activity with temporal phase reversals. Conclusions: By far the most common patterns overread as epileptiform are nonspecific fluctuations of background in the temporal regions, which are misread as temporal sharp waves.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Uldall P, Alving J, Hansen LK, et al: The misdiagnosis of epilepsy in children admitted to a tertiary epilepsy centre with paroxysmal events. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:219–221.
  2. Asano E, Pawlak C, Shah A, Shah J, Luat AF, Ahn-Ewing J, Chugani HT: The diagnostic value of initial video-EEG monitoring in children – review of 1,000 cases. Epilepsy Res 2005;66:129–135.
  3. Sabri MR, Mahmodian T, Sadri H: Usefulness of the head-up tilt test in distinguishing neurally mediated syncope and epilepsy in children aged 5–20 years old. Pediatr Cardiol 2006;27:600–603.
  4. Behrouz R, Benbadis SR: Late-onset psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2006;8:649–650.
  5. Duncan R, Oto M, Martin E, Pelosi A: Late onset psychogenic nonepileptic attacks. Neurology 2006;66:1644–1647.
  6. McBride AE, Shih TT, Hirsch LJ: Video-EEG monitoring in the elderly: a review of 94 patients. Epilepsia 2002;43:165–169.
  7. Chadwick D, Smith D: The misdiagnosis of epilepsy. BMJ 2002;324:495–496.
  8. Smith D, Defalla BA, Chadwick DW: The misdiagnosis of epilepsy and the management of refractory epilepsy in a specialist clinic. Q J Med 1999;92:15–23.
  9. Scheepers B, Clough P, Pickles C: The misdiagnosis of epilepsy: findings of a population study. Seizure 1998;7:403–406.
  10. Benbadis SR, Heriaud L, O’Neill E, et al: Outcome of prolonged EEG-video monitoring at a typical referral epilepsy center. Epilepsia 2004;45:1150–1153.
  11. Zaidi A, Clough P, Cooper P, Scheepers B, Fitzpatrick AP: Misdiagnosis of epilepsy: many seizure-like attacks have a cardiovascular cause. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:181–184.
  12. Ribai P, Tugendhaft P, Legros B: Usefulness of prolonged video-EEG monitoring and provocative procedure with saline injection for the diagnosis of non epileptic seizures of psychogenic origin. J Neurol 2006;253:328–332.
  13. Zhu Y: Video/EEG, the epileptic monitoring system. Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi 1990;23:367–370, 385–386.
  14. O’Rourke K, McNamara B, Sweeney BJ: Video-EEG recording: a four-year clinical audit. Ir Med J 2004;97:309.

    External Resources

  15. Bhatia M, Sinha PK, Jain S, Padma MV, Maheshwari MC: Usefulness of short-term video EEG recording with saline induction in pseudoseizures. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;95:363–366.
  16. Koblar SA, Black AB, Schapel GJ: Video-audio/EEG monitoring in epilepsy – the Queen Elizabeth Hospital experience. Clin Exp Neurol 1992;29:70–73.
  17. Lobello K, Morgenlander JC, Radtke RA, Bushnell CD: Video/EEG monitoring in the evaluation of paroxysmal behavioral events: duration, effectiveness, and limitations. Epilepsy Behav 2006;8:261–266.
  18. Hudak AM, Trivedi K, Harper CR, Booker K, Caesar RR, Agostini M, Van Ness PC, Diaz-Arrastia R: Evaluation of seizure-like episodes in survivors of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004;19:290–295.
  19. Attarian H, Dowling J, Carter J, Gilliam F: Video EEG monitoring prior to vagal nerve stimulator implantation. Neurology 2003;61:402–403.
  20. Krauss GL, Choi JS, Lesser RP: Pseudoseizure dogs. Neurology 2007;68:308–309.
  21. Nowack WJ: Epilepsy: a costly misdiagnosis. Clin Electroencephalogr 1997;28:225–228.
  22. Juarez-Garcia A, Stokes T, Shaw B, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Baker R: The costs of epilepsy misdiagnosis in England and Wales. Seizure 2006;15:598–605.
  23. Lafrance WC Jr, Benbadis SR: Avoiding the costs of unrecognized psychological nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 2006;13;66:1620–1621.

    External Resources

  24. Zivin L, Marsan CA: Incidence and prognostic significance of ‘epileptiform’ activity in the EEG of non-epileptic subjects. Brain 1968;91:751–778.
  25. Eiris-Punal J, Rodriguez-Nunez A, Fernandez-Martinez N, et al: Usefulness of the head-upright tilt test for distinguishing syncope and epilepsy in children. Epilepsia 2001;42:709–713.
  26. Benbadis SR, Tatum WO: Over-intepretation of EEGs and misdiagnosis of epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 2003;20:42–44.
  27. Ferrie CD: Preventing misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:206–209.
  28. Benbadis SR: Errors in EEGs and the misdiagnosis of epilepsy: Importance, causes, consequences, and proposed remedies. Epilepsy Behav 2007;11:257–262.
  29. Chadwick D: Diagnosis of epilepsy. Lancet 1990;336:291–295.
  30. Engel J: A practical guide for routine EEG studies in epilepsy. J Clin Neurophysiol 1984;1:109–142.
  31. Blume WT, Kaibara M, Young GB: Atlas of Adult Electroencephalography. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001, pp 41–172.
  32. Krauss GL, Abdallah A, Lesser R, et al: Clinical and EEG features of patients with EEG wicket rhythms misdiagnosed with epilepsy. Neurology 2005;64:1879.
  33. Beun AM, van Emde Boas W, Dekker E: Sharp transients in the sleep EEG of healthy adults: a possible pitfall in the diagnostic assessment of seizure disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;106:44–51.
  34. Kooi KA, Guevener AM, Tupper CJ, Bagchi BD: Electroencephalographic patterns of the temporal region in normal adults. Neurology 1964;14:1029–1035.
  35. Santamaria J, Chiappa KH: The EEG of drowsiness in normal adults. J Clin Neurophysiol 1987;4:327–382.
  36. Shinomiya S, Fukunaga T, Nagata K: Clinical aspects of the ‘third rhythm’ of the temporal lobe. Clin Electroencephalogr 1999;30:136–142.
  37. Abou-Khalil B, Misulis KE: Atlas of EEG and Seizure Semiology. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 2005.
  38. Benbadis SR: Introduction to EEG; in Lee-Chiong T (ed): Sleep: A Comprehensive Handbook. Hoboken, Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp 989–1024.
  39. Drury I, Beydoun A: Pitfalls of EEG interpretation in epilepsy. Neurol Clin 1993;11:857–881.
  40. Tatum WO, Husain A, Benbadis SR, Kaplan P: Normal adult EEG and patterns of uncertain significance. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:194–207.
  41. Gloor P: The EEG in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy; in Van Duyn H, Donker DNJ, Van Huffelen AC (eds): Current Concepts in Clinical Neurophysiology. The Hague, NV Drukker Trio, 1977, pp 9–21.
  42. Pillai J, Sperling MR: Interictal EEG and the diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsia 2006;47(suppl 1):14–22.
  43. Mizrahi EM: Avoiding the pitfalls of EEG interpretation in childhood epilepsy. Epilepsia 1996;37(suppl 1):S41–S51.
  44. Salerno SM, Alguire PC, Waxman HS: Competency in interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms: a summary and appraisal of published evidence. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:751–760.
  45. Benbadis SR: The EEG in nonepileptic seizures. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:340–352.
  46. Lesser RP, Luders H, Dinner DS, Morris H: An introduction to the basic concepts of polarity and localization. J Clin Neurophysiol 1985;2:45–61.
  47. Ajmone-Marsan CA, Zivin LS: Factors related to the occurrence of typical paroxysmal abnormalities in the EEG records of epileptic patients. Epilepsia 1970;11:361–381.
  48. Salinsky M, Kanter R, Dasheiff RM: Effectiveness of multiple EEGs in supporting the diagnosis of epilepsy: an operational curve. Epilepsia 1987;28:331–334.
  49. Kurtzke JF: The current neurologic burden of illness and injury in the United States. Neurology 1982;32:1207–1214.
  50. Holloway RG, Vickrey BG, Keran CM, Lesser E, Iverson D, Larson W, Swarztrauber K: US neurologists in the 1990s: trends in practice characteristics. Neurology 1999;52:1353–1561.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50