Background/Aims: The overinterpretation of EEGs is common and is an important contributor to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. We reviewed our experience in order to clarify which EEG patterns are commonly overread as epileptiform. Methods: We identified patients who were seen at our epilepsy clinic and were ultimately diagnosed as having conditions other than epilepsy. We selected those who had previously had an EEG read as showing epileptiform discharges and whose EEG was available for our own re-review. Results: 37 patients met the above criteria. Eventual diagnoses were psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (10), syncope (7), other miscellaneous diagnoses (5) and unexplained nonspecific symptoms (15). None of the EEGs had epileptiform discharges. The descriptions of the abnormalities included ‘temporal sharp waves’ in 30, ‘frontal sharp waves’ in 2 and ‘generalized spike-wave complexes’ in 2. Three had no reports available to identify the alleged abnormality. The benign patterns mistaken for temporal (30) and frontal (2) sharp waves were simple fluctuations of background activity with temporal phase reversals. Conclusions: By far the most common patterns overread as epileptiform are nonspecific fluctuations of background in the temporal regions, which are misread as temporal sharp waves.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: 2/8/2008
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0014-3022 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9913 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/ENE
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.