Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 25, No. 1, 2008
Issue release date: April 2008

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Gum Chewing for the Amelioration of Postoperative Ileus

de Castro S.M.M. · van den Esschert J.W. · van Heek N.T. · Dalhuisen S. · Koelemay M.J.W. · Busch O.R.C. · Gouma D.J.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Recent trials have shown promising results for the efficacy of gum chewing for the amelioration of postoperative ileus. This finding could have a major clinical impact since gum chewing is relatively harmless and cheap while postoperative ileus has a significant impact on healthcare. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of gum chewing after colorectal surgery to a standard control for the amelioration of postoperative ileus, expressed as time to flatus, time to defecation and overall hospital stay. Results: Five randomized controlled trials with a total number of 158 patients were found. The studies were homogeneous and a meta-analysis was performed. The pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) of time to flatus was significantly shorter for the gum-chewing group (20 h with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 13–27). The pooled WMD of time to defecation was significantly shorter (29 h, 95% CI of 19–39). There was a non-significant trend towards a shorter postoperative hospital stay (1.3 days shorter, 95% CI of 3.2 days shorter to 0.6 days longer). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows a favorable effect of gum chewing on time to flatus and defecation but no significant effect on the hospital stay.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Shibata Y, Toyoda S, Nimura Y, Miyati M: Patterns of intestinal motility recovery during the early stage following abdominal surgery: clinical and manometric study. World J Surg 1997;21:806–809.
  2. Delaney CP: Clinical perspective on postoperative ileus and the effect of opiates. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004;16(suppl 2):61–66.
  3. Chen HH, Wexner SD, Iroatulam AJ, Pikarsky AJ, Alabaz O, Nogueras JJ, et al: Laparoscopic colectomy compares favorably with colectomy by laparotomy for reduction of postoperative ileus. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:61–65.
  4. Carli F, Trudel JL, Belliveau P: The effect of intraoperative thoracic epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia on bowel function after colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1083–1089.
  5. Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT, Fink RJ, Mackay JR, Keck JO: Early feeding after elective open colorectal resections: A prospective randomized trial. Aust NZ J Surg 1998;68:125–128.
  6. Choi J, O’Connell TX: Safe and effective early postoperative feeding and hospital discharge after open colon resection. Am Surg 1996;62:853–856.
  7. Basse L, Hjort JD, Billesbolle P, Werner M, Kehlet H: A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–57.
  8. Holte K, Kehlet H: Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. Br J Surg 2000;87:1480–1493.
  9. Taguchi A, Sharma N, Saleem RM, Sessler DI, Carpenter RL, Seyedsadr M, et al: Selective postoperative inhibition of gastrointestinal opioid receptors. N Engl J Med 2001;345:935–940.
  10. Cheape JD, Wexner SD, James K, Jagelman DG: Does metoclopramide reduce the length of ileus after colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:437–441.
  11. Jepsen S, Klaerke A, Nielsen PH, Simonsen O: Negative effect of metoclopramide in postoperative adynamic ileus. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Br J Surg 1986;73:290–291.
  12. Peeters T, Matthijs G, Depoortere I, Cachet T, Hoogmartens J, Vantrappen G: Erythromycin is a motilin receptor agonist. Am J Physiol 1989;257:G470–G474.
  13. Carr CS, Ling KD, Boulos P, Singer M: Randomised trial of safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative enteral feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection. BMJ 1996;312:869–871.
  14. Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, et al: Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 2006;93:800–809.
  15. Anderson AD, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Tring I, Barker P, Mitchell CJ: Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 2003;90:1497–1504.
  16. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:851–859.
  17. Gatt M, Anderson AD, Reddy BS, Hayward-Sampson P, Tring IC, MacFie J: Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. Br J Surg 2005;92:1354–1362.
  18. Basse L, Thorbol JE, Lossl K, Kehlet H: Colonic surgery with accelerated rehabilitation or conventional care. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:271–277.
  19. Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Muller JM, Schwenk W: ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1463–1468.
  20. Bradshaw BG, Liu SS, Thirlby RC: Standardized perioperative care protocols and reduced length of stay after colon surgery. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:501–506.
  21. Higgins JPT, Green S: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cocrane Library, 2006.
  22. Miedema BW: Postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:901–902.
  23. Niloff PH: Does gum chewing ameliorate postoperative ileus? Results of a prospective randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:405.
  24. Lowenfels AB: Does gum chewing ameliorate postoperative ileus? J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:404–405.
  25. Asao T, Kuwano H, Nakamura J, Morinaga N, Hirayama I, Ide M: Gum chewing enhances early recovery from postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002;195:30–32.
  26. Quah HM, Samad A, Neathey AJ, Hay DJ, Maw A: Does gum chewing reduce postoperative ileus following open colectomy for left-sided colon and rectal cancer? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2006;8:64–70.
  27. Schuster R, Grewal N, Greaney GC, Waxman K: Gum chewing reduces ileus after elective open sigmoid colectomy. Arch Surg 2006;141:174–176.
  28. Matros E, Rocha F, Zinner M, Wang J, Ashley S, Breen E, et al: Does gum chewing ameliorate postoperative ileus? Results of a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:773–778.
  29. Hirayama I, Suzuki M, Ide M, Asao T, Kuwano H: Gum-chewing stimulates bowel motility after surgery for colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:206–208.
  30. Frantzides CT, Mathias C, Ludwig KA, Edmiston CE, Condon RE: Small bowel myoelectric activity in peritonitis. Am J Surg 1993;165:681–685.
  31. Lang IM, Sarna SK, Condon RE: Generation of phases I and II of migrating myoelectric complex in the dog. Am J Physiol 1986;251:G201–G207.
  32. Sarna SK: Myoelectric correlates of colonic motor complexes and contractile activity. Am J Physiol 1986;250:G213–G220.
  33. Sarna SK: Physiology and pathophysiology of colonic motor activity (2). Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:998–1018.
  34. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, Junghans T, Muller JM: Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:49–55.
  35. Koninger J, Gutt CN, Wente MN, Friess H, Martin E, Büchler MW: Postoperative ileus. Pathophysiology and prevention (in German). Chirurg 2006;77:904–912.
  36. Soffer EE, Adrian TE: Effect of meal composition and sham feeding on duodenojejunal motility in humans. Dig Dis Sci 1992;37:1009–1014.
  37. Bradshaw BG, Thirlby RC: The value of sham-feeding tests in patients with postgastrectomy syndromes. Arch Surg 1993;128:982–986.
  38. Stenquist B, Forssell H, Olbe L, Lundell L: Role of acid secretory response to sham feeding in predicting recurrent ulceration after proximal gastric vagotomy. Br J Surg 1994;81:1002–1006.
  39. Duncan C, Dougall H, Johnston P, Green S, Brogan R, Leifert C, et al: Chemical generation of nitric oxide in the mouth from the enterosalivary circulation of dietary nitrate. Nat Med 1995;1:546–551.
  40. Batra A, Klingler K, Landfeldt B, Friederich HM, Westin A, Danielsson T: Smoking reduction treatment with 4-mg nicotine gum: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;78:689–696.
  41. Tonnesen P: Smoking cessation: nicotine replacement, gums and patches. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1999;54:489–494.
  42. Fa-Si-Oen P, Roumen R, Buitenweg J, van de Velde C, van Geldere D, Putter H, et al: Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1509–1516.
  43. Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B, Rosin D, Hershko D, Shabtai M, et al: Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2003;237:363–367.
  44. Miettinen RP, Laitinen ST, Makela JT, Paakkonen ME: Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colorectal surgery: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:669–675.
  45. Basse L, Madsen JL, Kehlet H: Normal gastrointestinal transit after colonic resection using epidural analgesia, enforced oral nutrition and laxative. Br J Surg 2001;88:1498–1500.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50