Background and Aim: The undersizing of the bypass graft diameter compared to native artery changes blood flow characteristics and velocity which may affect conduit neo-endothelialization, intimal hyperplasia reaction and patency. The aim of this study was to evaluate conduit neoendothelialization, intimal hyperplasia reaction and patency results between undersized and matched ePTFE grafts. Material and Methods: In 16 male Sprague-Dawley rats, undersized (1-mm internal diameter) and matched (2-mm internal diameter) ePTFE grafts were anastomosed end-to-end in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. Blood flow volume per minute was measured and wall shear stress was calculated for each group. After 3 weeks of follow-up, angiography was performed via the left carotid artery just before sacrifice. Conduit neoendothelialization and intimal hyperplasia reaction were measured by computer-assisted morphometry. Results: Wall shear stress was 8 times higher for the undersized group (840.56 vs. 105.07 mPa). Three weeks after implantation, conduit neoendothelialization was better in matched grafts compared to undersized grafts (441 vs. 574 µm, p = 0.008). Intimal hyperplasia reaction was similar for both groups (8.7 vs. 6.7 µm2/µm for undersized and matched grafts, respectively). Patency rate was 7/8 for undersized and 8/8 for matched ePTFE grafts. Conclusion: Although the graft patency and the intimal hyperplasia reaction were not different between the two groups after 3 weeks, matched grafts had a significantly better endothelialization compared to undersized grafts. This short-term beneficial effect may influence long-term patency results.

Keywords:
Synthetic vascular graft, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Abdominal implantation, Neoendothelialization
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.