Intervirology 2008;51:61–69
(DOI:10.1159/000122600)

Differential Diagnosis of Hepatic Tumors: Value of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Sonography Using the Newly Developed Contrast Agent, Sonazoid

Hatanaka K.a · Kudo M.a · Minami Y.a · Ueda T.a · Tatsumi C.a · Kitai S.a · Takahashi S.a · Inoue T.a · Hagiwara S.a · Chung H.a · Ueshima K.a · Maekawa K.b
aDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, and bAbdominal Ultrasound Unit, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
email Corresponding Author


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography
  • Hepatic tumors
  • Intranodular hemodynamics
  • Intratumoral perfusion
  • Sonazoid
  • Ultrasonography

 goto top of outline Abstract

Objective: To clarify the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography (US) with Sonazoid, a second-generation US contrast agent, in the differential diagnosis of liver tumors compared to dynamic CT. Methods: A total of 249 hepatic nodules in 214 patients were studied; these included 177 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 42 liver metastases, 20 liver hemangiomas, 6 dysplastic nodules and 4 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs). After the injection of Sonazoid, nodules were scanned using real-time contrast-enhanced harmonic US in the vascular phases, i.e. the early and late vascular phases, and the Kupffer phase. Results: Six enhancement patterns were identified to be significant for the differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors. In HCCs, the presence of intratumoral vessels supplied from the periphery and fast washout (sensitivity, 96.6%; specificity, 94.4%) were the most typical characteristics. In metastases, the presence of rim-like enhancement with peripheral tumor vessels (sensitivity, 88.1%; specificity, 100%) was the typical pattern. In hemangiomas, the presence of intratumoral hypoperfusion images with globular or cotton wool-like pooling, which continue to the late vascular phase (sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 99.6%), was typical. In dysplastic nodules, the presence of portal enhancement without arterial supply in the early vascular phase and the presence of intratumoral uptake in the Kupffer phase (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 100%) were the most typical patterns. In FNHs, the presence of a spoke-wheel pattern in the early vascular phase with dense staining in the late vascular phase, and positive uptake within the nodule in the Kupffer phase (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%) were the most typical patterns. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced harmonic US with Sonazoid allowed intimate vascular and Kupffer imaging and, therefore, is useful for the differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors.

Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of outline References
  1. Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Fujita M, Nakahashi K, Okuda S: Color Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors. AJR 1990;154:509–514.
  2. Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Fujita M, Kasugai H, Inoue A, Ishiguro S: Small hepatocellular carcinoma: differentiation from adenomatous hyperplastic nodule with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1992;182:161–165.
  3. Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS: Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994;190:853–856.
  4. Koito K, Namieno T, Morita K: Differential diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and adenomatous hyperplasia with power Doppler sonography. AJR 1998;170:157–160.
  5. Fujimoto M, Moriyasu F, Nishikawa K, Nada T, Okuma M: Color Doppler sonography of hepatic tumors with a galactose-based contrast agent: correlation with angiographic findings. AJR 1994;163:1099–1104.
  6. Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H, Suetomi Y, Minami Y, Maekawa K: Hepatocellular carcinoma: depiction of tumor parenchymal flow with intermittent harmonic power Doppler US during the early arterial phase in dual-display mode. Radiology 2001;220:349–356.
  7. Kudo M, Tomita S, Tochio H, Mimura J, Okabe Y, Kashida H, Hirasa M, Ibuki Y, Todo A: Sonography with intraarterial infusion of carbon dioxide microbubbles (sonographic angiography): value in differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors. AJR 1992;158:65–74.
  8. Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M, Iijima H: Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:318–325.
  9. Kudo M, Okanoue T; Japan Society of Hepatology: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice manual proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Oncology 2007;72(suppl 1):2–15.
  10. Sontum PC, Ostensen J, Dyrstad K, Hoff L: Acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution. Invest Radiol 1999;34:268–275.
  11. Maresca G, Summaria V, Colagrande C, Manfredi R, Calliada F: New prospects for ultrasound contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:171–178.

    External Resources

  12. Kudo M: Morphological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: special emphasis on intranodular hemodynamic imaging. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:1226–1231.
  13. Isozaki T, Numata K, Kiba T, Hara K, Morimoto M, Sakaguchi T, Sekihara H, Kubota T, Shimada H, Morizane T, Tanaka K: Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at US. Radiology 2003;229:798–805.
  14. D’Onofrio M, Martone E, Faccioli N, Zamboni G, Malagò R, Mucelli RP: Focal liver lesions: sinusoidal phase of CEUS. Abdom Imaging 2006;31:529–536.
  15. Watanabe R, Matsumura M, Chen CJ, Kaneda Y, Fujimaki M: Characterization of tumor imaging with microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agent, Sonazoid, in rabbit liver. Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:972–977.
  16. Wang J-H, Lu S-N, Hung C-H, Chen TY, Chen CH, Changchien CS, Lee CM: Small hepatic nodules (≤2 cm) in cirrhosis patients: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Liver Int 2006;6:928–934.

    External Resources

  17. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, Yoshikawa J, Takashima T, Nakanuma Y, Unoura M, Kobayashi K, Izumi R, Ida M, Kitagawa K: Benign and malignant nodules in cirrhotic livers: distinction based on blood supply. Radiology 1991;178:493–497.
  18. Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Hirohashi S, Sakamoto M, Okazaki N, Takayasu K, Kosuge T, Motoo Y, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H: Malignant transformation of adenomatous hyperplasia to hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 1990;336:1150–1153.
  19. Mathieu D, Bruneton JN, Drouillard J, Pointreau CC, Vasile N: Hepatic adenomas and focal nodular hyperplasia: dynamic CT study. Radiology 1986;160:53–58.
  20. Wanless IR, Mawdsley C, Adams R: On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Hepatology 1985;5:1194–1200.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Masatoshi Kudo, MD, PhD
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine
Kinki University School of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi
Osaka-Sayama 589-8511 (Japan)
Tel. +81 72 366 0221, Fax +81 72 367 2880, E-Mail m-kudo@med.kindai.ac.jp


 goto top of outline Article Information

Published online: June 10, 2008
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 6, Number of Tables : 0, Number of References : 20


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Intervirology (International Journal of Basic and Medical Virology)

Vol. 51, No. Suppl. 1, Year 2008 (Cover Date: June 2008)

Journal Editor: Liebert U.G. (Leipzig)
ISSN: 0300–5526 (Print), eISSN: 1423–0100 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/INT


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.