Background: The present paper examines the levels of emotional distress and professional burnout among health care professionals working with HIV patients in two different settings, Infectious Disease (ID) Units and a Haemophilia (H) Unit, and compares them with those of professionals working in Oncology (O) or General Internal Medicine (IM) Units, all at public hospitals. Methods: Cross-sectional anonymous survey assessing their psychological condition, occupational stress, work and social adjustment, and providing information about stressors, supports and coping methods, using the General Health Questionnaire, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, the Modified Social Adjustment Scale, and other self-administered instruments. Results: Perceived stress was higher in both O and IM, and the number of stressful circumstances was especially higher in O. No significant differences in psychological morbidity were found among the groups, with these exceptions: a better status among the H staff, who also showed less overall burnout; emotional exhaustion was lower in both ID and H than in the two other groups; the ID staff showed less personal accomplishment. Using a multiple regression model, a series of variables – including work adjustment, social/leisure adjustment, and having chosen to work in their position – was able to predict outcome. Conclusions: Our results highlight the presence of substantial levels of emotional distress and work-related difficulties in a significant number of health care workers. The mental health services could play an important role in conducting further research in this field and in providing practical help to deal with staff’s difficulties.
Copyright 1999 S.Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.