Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 5, No. 3-4, 2000
Issue release date: May–August 2000
Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:167–185
(DOI:10.1159/000013878)

Maturation of the Mismatch Negativity: Effects of Profound Deafness and Cochlear Implant Use

Ponton C.W. · Eggermont J.J. · Don M. · Waring M.D. · Kwong B. · Cunningham J. · Trautwein P.
aElectrophysiology Laboratory and bChildren’s Auditory Research and Evaluation Center, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, Calif., cAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., USA; dDepartments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Psychology, University of Calgary, Canada

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

The use of cochlear implants to restore auditory sensation in deaf children is increasing, with a trend toward earlier implantation. However, little is known about how auditory deprivation and subsequent cochlear implant use affect the maturing human central auditory system. Our previous studies have demonstrated that the obligatory auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) of implanted children are very different from those of normal-hearing children. Unlike the obligatory potentials, which primarily reflect neural responses to stimulus onset, the mismatch negativity (MMN) provides a neurophysiological measure of auditory short-term memory and discrimination processes. The purpose of this investigation is to review our studies of the effects of auditory deprivation due to profound deafness and cochlear implant use on the maturation of the MMN in children, placed in the context of overall age-related changes in the AEPs. The development and application of a statistical technique to assess the MMN in individuals is also reviewed. Results show that although the morphology of the obligatory AEPs is substantially altered by the absence of a normal N1 peak, the MMN is robustly present in a group of implanted children who have good spoken language perception through their device. Differences exist in the scalp distribution of the MMN between implanted and normal-hearing children. Specifically, the MMN appears to be more symmetrical in amplitude over both hemispheres, whereas it is initially much larger over the contralateral hemisphere in normal-hearing children. These findings suggest that, compared to N1, the MMN is a better measure of basic auditory processes necessary for the development of spoken language perception skills in profoundly deaf children and adults who use a cochlear implant.

Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Alho K, Sainio K, Sajaniemi N, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R: Event-related brain potential of human newborns to pitch change of an acoustic stimulus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;77:151–155.
  2. Barnet A, Ohlrich E, Weiss I, Shanks B: Auditory evoked potentials during sleep in normal children from ten days to three years of age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975;39:29–41.
  3. Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM: Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 1986;7:20–26.

    External Resources

  4. Blakemore C, Vital-Durand F: Postnatal development of the monkey’s visual system. Ciba Found Symp 1981;86:152–171.

    External Resources

  5. Bruneau N, Roux S, Guerin P, Barthelemy C, Lelord G: Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4- to 8-year-old children. Psychophysiology 1997;34:32–38.
  6. Ceponiené R, Cheour M, Näätänen R: Interstimulus interval and auditory event-related potentials in children: Evidence for multiple generators. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998;108:345–354.
  7. Cheour M, Alho K, Ceponiené R, Reinikainen K, Sainio K, Pohjavuori M, Aaltonen O, Näätänen R: Maturation of mismatch negativity in infants. Int J Psychophysiol 1998;29:217–226.
  8. Cheour-Luhtanen M, Alho K, Kujala T, Sainio K, Reinikainen K, Renlund M, Aaltonen O, Eerola O, Näätänen R: Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns. Hear Res 1995;82:53–58.

    External Resources

  9. Courchesne E: Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: Changes in long-latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:468–482.
  10. Courchesne E: Chronology of postnatal human brain development: Event-related potentials, positron emission tomography, myelogenesis, and synaptogenesis studies; in Rohrbaugh JW, Parasuraman R, Johnson R Jr (eds): Event-Related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications. New York, Oxford University Press, 1990, pp 210–241.
  11. Csépe V: On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear 1995;16:91–103.
  12. Cunningham J, Ponton CW, Don M, Masuda A: Spatio-temporal source modeling of the mismatch negativity evoked by stimulus duration differences. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Midwinter Meeting, 1996, abstract 59.
  13. Edgington ES: Randomization Tests. New York, Decker, 1995.
  14. Eggermont JJ: On the maturation of sensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;70:293–305.
  15. Ejiri K, Okubo O, Okuni M: The study of mismatch negativity. No To Hattatsu 1992;24:565–570.
  16. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K: Auditory magnetic fields: Source localization and ‘tonotopic organization’ in the right hemisphere of human brain. Scand Audiol 1982;10:203–207.
  17. Glendenning KK, Baker BN, Hutson KA, Masterson RB: Acoustic chiasm. V. Inhibition and excitation in the ipsilateral and contralateral projections of the LSO. J Comp Neurol 1992;319:100–122.
  18. Grau C, Escera C, Yago E, Polo M: Mismatch negativity and auditory sensory memory evaluation: A new faster paradigm. Neuroreport 1998;9:2451–2456.

    External Resources

  19. Graybiel AM: The thalamo-cortical projection of the so-called posterior nuclear group: A study with anterograde degeneration methods in the cat. Brain Res 1973;49:229–244.
  20. Hari R, Kaila K, Kaila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T: Interstimulus interval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: Implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:561–569.
  21. Hayakawa K, Konishi Y, Matsuda T, Kuriyama M, Konishi K, Yamashita K, Okumura R, Hamanaka D: Development and aging of brain midline structures: Assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172:171–177.

    External Resources

  22. Jasper HH: The ten-twenty system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958;10:371–375.
  23. Javitt DC, Steinschneider M, Schroeder CE, Vaughan HG Jr, Arezzo JC: Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation. Brain Res 1994;667:192–200.
  24. Kaukoranta E, Sams M, Hari R, Hämäläinen M, Näätänen R: Reaction of human auditory cortex to a change of tone duration. Hear Res 1989;41:15–22.
  25. Khosla D, Ponton CW, Vasama JP, Kwong B, Don M: Effects of profound unilateral deafness on the adult human central auditory system. In preparation.
  26. Klee TM, Davis-Dansky E: A comparison of unilaterally hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing children on a battery of standardized language tests. Ear Hear 1986;7:27–37.

    External Resources

  27. Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, King C, Tremblay K, Nicol T: Central auditory system plasticity with speech discrimination training. J Cogn Neurosci 1995;7:25–32.
  28. Kraus N, McGee T, Littman T, Nicol T, King C: Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change. J Neurophysiol 1994;72:1270–1277.

    External Resources

  29. Kurtzberg D, Vaughan HG Jr, Kreuzer JA, Fliegler KZ: Developmental studies and clinical application of mismatch negativity: Problems and prospects. Ear Hear 1995;16:105–117.

    External Resources

  30. Leake PA, Snyder RL, Hradek GT, Rebscher SJ: Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 1995;82:65–80.

    External Resources

  31. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P: Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:204–214.
  32. Lu ZL, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L: Behavioral lifetime of human auditory sensory memory predicted by physiological measures. Science 1992;258:1668–1670.

    External Resources

  33. Mäkelä JP, Hari R: Neuromagnetic auditory evoked responses after a stroke in the right temporal lobe. Neuroreport 1992;3:94–96.

    External Resources

  34. Mäkelä JP, McEvoy L: Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements. Exp Brain Res 1996;110:446–454.

    External Resources

  35. Marzi CA, Bisiacchi P, Nicoletti R: Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 1991;29:1163–1177.
  36. Näätänen R: The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 1990;13:201–288.
  37. Näätänen R, Picton TW: The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375–425.
  38. Paetau R, Ahonen A, Salonen O, Sams M: Auditory evoked magnetic fields to tones and pseudowords in healthy children and adults. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:177–185.
  39. Pang EW, Edmonds GE, Desjardins R, Khan SC, Trainor LJ, Taylor MJ: Mismatch negativity to speech stimuli in 8-month-old infants and adults. Int J Psychophysiol 1998;29:227–236.

    External Resources

  40. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:160–170.
  41. Ponton CW, Don M: The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:131–146.
  42. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B: Integrated MMN (MMNi): A noise free representation that allows distribution free single-point statistical tests. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;104:143–150.

    External Resources

  43. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Kwong B, Masuda A: Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 1996a;8:61–65.
  44. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A: Maturation of human cortical auditory function: Differences between normal hearing and cochlear implant children. Ear Hear 1996b;17:430–437.
  45. Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A: Spatio-temporal source modeling of AEPs to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation of the auditory system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993;88:478–493.
  46. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Don M, Kwong B: Maturation of human central auditory system activity: Evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, in press.
  47. Ponton CW, Moore JK, Eggermont JJ: Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: Evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand Audiol 1999;28(suppl 51):13–22.
  48. Ponton CW, Vasama JP, Tremblay K, Khosla D, Kwong B, Don M: Experience-related increases in inter-hemispheric correlations of evoked neurophysiological activity following profound unilateral deafness. Submitted.
  49. Pujol J, Vendrell P, Junqué C, Martí-Vilalta JL, Capdevila A: When does the human brain development end? Evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood. Ann Neurol 1993;34:71–75.
  50. Rauch RA, Jinkins JR: Analysis of cross-sectional area measurements of the corpus callosum adjusted for brain size in male and female subjects from childhood to adulthood. Behav Brain Res 1994;64:65–78.
  51. Recanzone GH, Jenkins WM, Hradek GT, Merzenich MM: Progressive improvement in discriminative abilities in adult owl monkeys following a tactile frequency discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 1992;67:1015–1030.

    External Resources

  52. Rif J, Hari R, Hamalainen MS, Sams M: Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991;79:464–472.
  53. Scherg M: Fundamentals of dipole source analysis; in Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electrical Potentials. Adv Audiol. Basel, Karger, 1990, vol 6, pp 40–49.
  54. Scherg M, Vasjar J, Picton TW: A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1989;1:336–355.
  55. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee TJ, Nicol TG: Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;104:540–545.
  56. Snyder RL: Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central representation. Hear Res 1990;50:7–33.
  57. Snyder RL: Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 1991;56:246–264.
  58. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr: Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport 1998;9:4167–4170.

    External Resources

  59. Timney B, Mitchell DE: Behavioral recovery from visual deprivation: Comments on the critical period; in Freeman RD (ed): Developmental Neurobiology of Vision. New York, Plenum Press, 1979, pp 149–160.
  60. Tonnquist-Uhlén I: Topography of auditory evoked cortical potentials in children with severe language impairment. Scand Audiol 1996;25(suppl 44):1–40.
  61. Trautwein PG, Ponton CW, Kwong B, Waring MD: Neurophysiological and psychophysical measures of duration discrimination in normal-hearing adults and adults with cochlear implants. Proc 16th Int Congr Acoustics and 135th Meet Acoust Soc Am, Seattle, 1998, pp 877–878.
  62. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T: The time course of auditory perceptual learning: Neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. Neuroreport 1998;9:3557–3560.

    External Resources

  63. Truy E, Lina-Granade G, Jonas AM, Martinon G, Maison S, Girard J, Porot M, Morgon A: Comprehension of language in congenitally deaf children with and without cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998;15:83–89.

    External Resources

  64. Vasama JP, Mäkelä JP: Auditory pathway plasticity in adult humans after unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res 1995;87:132–140.
  65. Weinberger NM, Diamond DM: Physiological plasticity in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning. Prog Neurobiol 1987;29:1–55.
  66. Winer JA: The functional architecture of the medial geniculate nucleus and the primary auditory cortex; in Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds): The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy. New York, Springer, 1992, pp 222–409.
  67. Woods DL, Elmasian R: The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986;65:447–459.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50