Comparative and experimental approaches to cognition in different animal taxa suggest some degree of convergent evolution. Similar cognitive trends associated with similar lifestyles (sociality, generalism, new habitats) are seen in taxa that are phylogenetically distant and possess remarkably different brains. Many cognitive measures show positive intercorrelations at the inter-individual and inter-taxon level, suggesting some degree of general intelligence. Ecological principles like the unpredictability of resources in space and time may drive different types of cognition (e.g., social and non-social) in the same direction. Taxa that rank high on comparative counts of cognition in the field are usually the ones that succeed well in experimental tests, with the exception of avian imitation. From apes to birds, fish and beetles, a few common principles appear to have influenced the evolution of brains and cognition in widely divergent taxa.

Keywords:
Brain, Evolution, Neuroecology, Cognition
1.
Airey DC, DeVoogd TJ (2000) Variation in song complexity and HBC volume are significantly related in zebra finches. NeuroReport 10:2339–2344.
2.
Airey DC, Kroodsma DE, DeVoogd TJ (2000a) Differences in the complexity of song tutoring cause differences in the amount learned and in dendritic spine density in a songbird telencephalic song control nucleus. Neurobiol Learn Mem 73:274–281.
3.
Airey DC, Castillo-Juarez H, Casella G, Pollak EJ, DeVoogd TJ (2000b) Variation in the volume of zebra finch song control nuclei is heritable: developmental and evolutionary implications. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:2099– 2104.
4.
Bennett PM, Harvey PH (1985) Relative brain size and ecology in birds. J Zool 207:151–169.
5.
Bonnie KE, Horner V, Whiten A, de Waal FBM (2007) Spread of arbitrary conventions among chimpanzees: a controlled experiment. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:367–372.
6.
Bouchard J, Goodyer W, Lefebvre L (2007) Innovation and social learning are positively correlated in pigeons. An Cog 10:259–266.
7.
Brenowitz EA (1997) Comparative approaches to the avian song system. J Neurobiol 33:517–531.
8.
Brosnan SF, Grady MF, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Beran MJ (2008) Chimpanzee autarky. PloS One 3:e1518.
9.
Byrne RW, Corp N (2004) Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1693–1699.
10.
Byrne RW, Whiten A (eds) (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Byrne RW (1993) Do larger brains mean greater intelligence? Behav Brain Sci 16:696–697.
12.
Changizi MA (2003) Relationship between number of muscles, behavioral repertoire size, and encephalization in mammals. J Theor Biol 220:157–168.
13.
Chen A, Walsh CA (2002) Regulation of cerebral cortical size by control of cell cycle exit in neural precursors. Science 297:365–369.
14.
Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1980) Primates, brain and ecology. J Zool Lond 190:309–323.
15.
Day LB, Westcott DA, Olster DH (2005) Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds. Brain Behav Evol 66:62–72.
16.
Deaner, Ro, van Scahik, CP, Johnson V (2006) Do some taxa have better domaon-general cognition than others? A meta-analysis of non-human primate studies. Evol Psych 4:149–196.
17.
Deaner RO, Isler K, Burkart J, van Schaik C (2007) Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav Evol 70:115–124.
18.
Dediu D, Ladd DR (2007) Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and microcephalin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10944–10949.
19.
DeVoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A (1993) Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song-comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 254:75–82.
20.
Drake JM (2007) Parental investment and fecundity, but not brain size, are associated with establishment success in introduced fishes. Funct Ecol 21:963–968.
21.
Drapier M, Chauvin C, Dufour V, Uhlrich P, Thierry B (2005) Food-exchange with humans in brown capuchin monkeys. Primates 46:241–248.
22.
Dunbar RIM (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Evol Anthropol 6:178–190.
23.
Emery NJ, Seed AM, von Bayern AMP, Clayton NS (2007) Cognitive adaptations of social bonding in birds. Phil Trans R Soc B 362:489–505.
24.
Evans PD, Gilbert SL, Mekel-Bobrov N, Vallender EJ, Anderson JR, Vaez-Azizi LM, Tishkoff SA, Hudson RR, Lahn BT (2005) Microcephalin, a gene regulating brain size, continues to evolve adaptively in humans. Science 309:1717–1720.
25.
Farris SM (2005) Evolution of insect mushroom bodies: old clues, new insights. Arthr Struc Dev 34:211–234.
26.
Farris SM (2008) Evolutionary convergence of higher brain centers spanning the protostome-deuterostome boundary. Brain Behav Evol 72:106–122.
27.
Farris SM, Roberts NS (2005) Coevolution of generalist feeding ecologies and gyrencephalic mushroom bodies in insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17394–17399.
28.
Fragaszy D, Izar P, Visalberghi E, Ottoni EB, De Oliveira MG (2004) Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools. Am J Primatol 64:359–366.
29.
Garamszegi LZ, Eens M (2004) Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res Rev 44:187–193.
30.
Giraldeau LA, Lefebvre L, Morand-Ferron J (2007) Can restrictive definitions lead to biases and tautologies? Behav Brain Sci 30:411–412.
31.
Gittleman JL (1986) Carnivore brain size, behavioural ecology, and phylogeny. J Mammal 67:23–36.
32.
Goodson JL, Evans AK, Wang Y (2006) Neuropeptide binding reflects convergent and divergent evolution in species-typical group sizes. Horm Behav 50:223–236.
33.
Griffin AS, Galef BG Jr (2005) Social learning about predators: does timing matter? Anim Behav 69:669–678.
34.
Harvey PH, Clutton-Brock TH, Mace GM (1980) Brain size and ecology in small mammals and primates. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 77:4387–4389.
35.
Herculano-Houzel S (2007) Encephalization, neuronal excess, and neuronal index in rodents. Anat Rec 290:1280–1287.
36.
Herculano-Houzel S, Mota B, Lent R (2006) Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12138–12143.
37.
Herculano-Houzel S, Collins CE, Wong PY, Kaas JH (2007) Cellular scaling rules for primate brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3562–3567.
38.
Hunt GR (1996) Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows. Nature 379:249–251.
39.
Hunt GR, Gray RD (2004) Direct observations of pandanus-tool manufacture and use by a New Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Anim Cogn 7:114–120.
40.
Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (1999) Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286:2526–2528.
41.
Iwaniuk AN, Hurd PL (2005) The evolution of cerebrotypes in birds. Brain Behav Evol 65:215–230.
42.
Iwaniuk AN, Nelson JE (2003) Developmental differences are correlated with relative brain size in birds: a comparative analysis. Can J Zool 81:1913–1928.
43.
Jacobs LF (1996) Sexual selection and the brain. Trends Ecol Evol 11:A82–A86.
44.
Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
45.
Kenward B, Weir AAS, Rutz C, Kacelnik A (2005) Tool manufacture by naïve juvenile crows. Nature 433:121–121.
46.
Kouprina N, Pavlicek A, Solomon G, Gersch W, Yoon YH, Collura R, Ruvolo M, Barrett JC, Woods CG, Walsh CA, Jurka J, Larionov V (2004) Accelerated evolution of the ASPM gene controlling brain size begins prior to human brain expansion. PLoS Biol 2:653–663.
47.
Krebs JR, Sherry DF, Healy SD, Perry H, Vaccarino AL (1989) Hippocampal specialization in food storing birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1388–1392.
48.
Lefebvre L, Bouchard J (2003) Social learning about food in birds. In: The Biology of Traditions (Perry S, Fragaszy DM, eds), pp 94–126. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Lefebvre L (1982) Food exchange strategies in an infant chimpanzee. J Human Evol 11:195–204.
50.
Lefebvre L, Bolhuis JJ (2003) Positive and negative correlates of feeding innovations in birds: evidence for limited modularity. In: Animal Innovation (Reader SM, Laland KN, eds), pp 39–62. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51.
Lefebvre L, Juretic N, Timmermans S, Nicolakakis N (2001) Is the link between innovation rate and forebrain size caused by confounding variables? A test on North American and Australian birds. Anim Cogn 4:91–97.
52.
Lefebvre L, Nicolakakis N, Boire D (2002) Tools and brains in birds. Behaviour 139:939–973.
53.
Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D (2004) Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain Behav Evol 63:233–246.
54.
Lefebvre L, Whittle P, Lascaris E, Finkelstein A (1997a) Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Anim Behav 53:549–560.
55.
Lefebvre L, Templeton J, Brown K, Koelle M (1997b) Carib grackles imitate conspecific and Zenaida dove tutors. Behaviour 134:1003–1017.
56.
Lewis JW (2006) Cortical networks related to human use of tools. Neuroscience 2:211–231.
57.
Lindefors P, Nunn CL, Barton RA (2007) Primate brain architecture and selection in relation to sex. BMC Biol 5:20.
58.
Lucas JR, Brodin A, de Kort SR, Clayton NS (2004) Does hippocampal size correlate with the degree of caching specialization? Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2423–2429.
59.
Madden J (2001) Sex, bowers and brains. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:833–838.
60.
Martin RD (1981) Relative brain size and basal metabolic-rate in terrestrial vertebrates Nature 293:57–60.
61.
Mekel-Bobrov N, Gilbert SL, Evans PD, Vallender EJ, Anderson JR, Hudson RR, Tishkoff SA, Lahn BT (2005) Ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM, a brain size determinant in Homo sapiens. Science 309:1720–1722.
62.
Mekel-Bobrov N, Posthuma D, Gilbert SL, Lind P, Gosso MF, Luciano M, Harris SE, Bates TC, Polderman TJC, Whalley LJ, Fox H, Starr JM, Evans PD, Montgomery GW, Fernandes C, Heutink P, Martin NG, Boomsma DI, Deary IJ, Wright MJ, de Geus EJC, Lahn BT (2007) The ongoing adaptive evolution of ASPM and Microcephalin is not explained by increased intelligence. Hum Mol Genet 16:600–608.
63.
Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300.
64.
Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L, Reader SM, Sol D, Elvin S (2004) Dunking behaviour in Carib grackles. Anim Behav 68:1267–1274.
65.
Morand-Ferron J, Veillette M, Lefebvre L (2006) Stealing of dunked food in Carib grackles (Quiscalus lugubris). Behav Proc 73:342–347.
66.
Morand-Ferron J, Giraldeau LA, Lefebvre L (2007a) Wild carib grackles play a producer-scrounger game. Behav Ecol 18:916–921.
67.
Morand-Ferron J, Lefebvre L (2007b) Flexible expression of a food-processing behaviour: determinants of dunking rates in wild Carib grackles of Barbados. Behav Proc 76:218–221.
68.
Moura ACD, Lee PC (2004) Capuchin stone tool use in Caatinga dry forest. Science 306:1909–1909.
69.
Nicolakakis N, Lefebvre L (2000) Innovation rate and forebrain size in birds of western Europe: feeding, nesting and confounding variables. Behaviour 137:1415–1429.
70.
Obayashi S, Suhara T, Kawabe K, Okauchi T, Maeda J, Akine Y, Onoe H, Iriki A (2001) Functional brain mapping of monkey tool use. Neuroimage 14:853–861.
71.
Orenstein RI (1972) Tool-use by Caledonian crow (Corvus moneduloides). Auk 89:674–676.
72.
Overington SE, Dubois F, Lefebvre L (2008) Food unpredictability drives both generalism and social foraging: a game theoretical model. Behav Ecol 19:836–841.
73.
Parker ST, Gibson KR (1977) Object manipulation, tool use and sensorimotor intelligence as feeding adaptations in cebus monkeys and great apes. J Hum Evol 6:623–641.
74.
Perez-Barberia FJ, Shultz S, Dunbar RIM (2007) Evidence for coevolution of sociality and relative brain size in three orders of mammals. Evolution 61:2811–2821.
75.
Pfaff JA, Zanette L, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, MacDougall-Shackleton EA (2007) Song repertoire size varies with HVC volume and is indicative of male quality in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proc R Soc Lond B 274:2035–2040.
76.
Pitnick S, Jones KE, Wilkinson GS (2006) Mating system and brain size in bats. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:719–724.
77.
Plomin R (2001) The genetics of g in human and mouse. Nature Rev Neurosci 2:136–141.
78.
Pollen AA, Dobberfuhl AP, Scace J, Igulu MM, Renn SCP, Shumway CA, Hofmann HA (2007) Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav Evol 70:21–39.
79.
Ratcliffe JM, Fenton MB, Shettleworth SJ (2006) Behavioral flexibility is positively correlated with relative brain volume in predatory bats. Brain Behav Evol 67:165–176.
80.
Reader SM, Laland KN (2002) Social intelligence, innovation and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:4436–4441.
81.
Reader SM, MacDonald K (2003) Environmental variability and primate behavioural flexibility. In: Animal Innovation (Reader SM, Laland KN, eds), pp 83–116. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
82.
Ricklefs RE (2004) The cognitive face of avian life histories – The 2003 Margaret Morse Nice Lecture. Wilson Bull 116:119–133.
83.
Rilling JK, Gutman DA, Zeh TR, Pagnoni G, Berns GS, Kilts CD (2002) A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35:395–405.
84.
Sawaguchi T, Kudo H (1990) Neocortical development and social-structure in primates. Primates 31:283–289.
85.
Schillaci MA (2006) Sexual selection and the evolution of brain size in primates. PloS One 1:e62.
86.
Sherry DF (2006) Neuroecology. Ann Rev Psychol 57:167–197.
87.
Sherry DF, Schacter DL (1987) The evolution of multiple memory-systems. Psychol Rev 94:439–454.
88.
Sherry DF, Vaccarino AL, Buckenham K Herz RS (1989) The hippocampal complex of food-storing birds. Brain Behav Evol 34:308–317.
89.
Shumway C (2008) Habitat complexity, brain, and behavior. Brain Behav Evol 72:123–134.
90.
Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (in press) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat (in press).
91.
Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM, Cassey P, Lefebvre L (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5460–5465.
92.
Sol D, Szekely T, Liker A, Lefebvre L (2007) Big brained birds survive better in nature. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:763–769.
93.
Spritzer MD, Meikle DB, Solomon NG (2005) Female choice based on male spatial ability and aggressiveness among meadow voles Anim Behav 69:1121–1130.
94.
Stephan H, Frahm H, Baron G (1981) New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia Primatol 35:1–29.
95.
Taylor AH, Hunt GR, Holzhaider JC, Gray RD (2007) Spontaneous metatool use by New Caledonian crows. Current Biol 17:1504–1507.
96.
Timmermans S, Lefebvre L, Boire D, Basu P (2000) Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of innovation rate in birds. Brain Behav Evol 56:196–203.
97.
Vallender EJ (2008) Exploring the Origins of the Human Brain through Molecular Evolution. Brain Behav Evol 72:168–177.
98.
Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM. (1990) Do monkeys ape? In: Language and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes (Parker ST, Gibson KR, eds), pp 247–273. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
99.
Webster S, Lefebvre L (2001) Problem-solving and neophobia in a Passeriforme Columbiforme assemblage in Barbados. Anim Behav 62:23–32.
100.
Weir AAS, Chappell J, Kacelnik A (2002) Shaping of hooks in new Caledonian crows. Science 297:981.
101.
Whiten A, Custance DM, Gomez JC, Teixidor P, Bard KA (1996) Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 110:3–14.
102.
Zeng SJ, Song K, Xu N, Zhang XW, Zuo MX (2007) Sex difference in cellular proliferation within the telencephalic ventricle zone of Bengalese finch. Neurosci Res 58:207–214.
103.
Zentall TR (2004) Action imitation in birds. Learn Behav 32:15–23.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.