Vol. 18, No. 1, 2009
Issue release date: December 2008
Open Access Gateway
Med Princ Pract 2009;18:1–9
(DOI:10.1159/000163038)
Review
Add to my selection

Problem-Based Learning and Medical Education Forty Years On

A Review of Its Effects on Knowledge and Clinical Performance

Neville A.J.
McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ont., Canada
email Corresponding Author


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Problem-based learning
  • Medical education
  • Self-directed learning
  • Memory and cognitive architecture
  • Guided learning
  • Outcome assessment
  • Clinical competency

 goto top of outline Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) has swept the world of medical education since its introduction 40 years ago, leaving a trail of unanswered or partially answered questions about its benefits. The literature is replete with systematic reviews and meta-analyses, all of which have identified some common themes; however, heterogeneity in the definition of a ‘problem-based learning curriculum’ and its delivery, coupled with different outcome measurements, has produced divergent opinions. Proponents and detractors continue to dispute the merits of the cognitive foundation of a PBL approach, but, despite this, there is evidence that graduates of PBL curricula demonstrate equivalent or superior professional competencies compared with graduates of more traditional curricula.

Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


 goto top of outline References
  1. Barrows HS: Problem-based learning applied to medical education Springfield. Carbondale, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 2000.
  2. Muller S: Physicians for the 21st century: report of the project panel of the general professional education of the physician and college preparation for medicine. J Med Educ 1984;59:1–200.
  3. Walton HJ, Matthews MB: Essentials of problem-based learning. Med Educ 1989;23:542–558.
  4. Vernon DT, Blake RL: Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med 1993;68:550–563.
  5. Berkson L: Problem-based learning: have the expectations been met? Acad Med 1993;68:S79–S88.
  6. Albanese MA, Mitchell S: Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993;68:52–81.
  7. Nandi PL, Chan JN, Chan CP, Chan P, Chan LP: Undergraduate medical education: comparison of problem-based learning and conventional teaching. Hong Kong Med J 2000;6:301–306.
  8. Smits PB, Verbeek JH, de Buisonjé CD: Problem based learning in continuing medical education: a review of controlled evaluation studies. BMJ 2002;324:153–156.
  9. Newman M: A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of problem-based learning: on behalf of the Campbell Collaboration Systematic Review Group on the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning. Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2003.
  10. Koh GC, Khoo HE, Wong ML, Koh D: The effects of problem-based learning during medical school on physician competency: a systematic review. CMAJ 2008;178:34–41.
  11. Anthony WS: Learning to discover rules by discovery. J Ed Psych 1979;64:325–328.

    External Resources

  12. Rutherford FJ: The role of inquiry in science teaching. J Res Sci Teach 1964;2:80–84.

    External Resources

  13. Kolb DA, Fry R: Toward an applied theory of experiential learning; in Cooper C (ed): Studies of Group Process. New York, Wiley, 1975, pp 33–57.
  14. Steffe L, Gale J: Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.
  15. Kirschner PA, Sweller J, Clark RE: Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educ Psychol 2006;41:75–86.

    External Resources

  16. Maudsley G: Do we all mean the same thing by ‘problem-based learning’? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Acad Med 1999;74:178–185.
  17. Barrows HS: A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Med Educ 1986;20:481–486.
  18. Barrows HS: A specific, problem-based, self-directed learning method designed to teach medical problem-solving skills, self-learning skills and enhance knowledge retention and recall; in Schmidt HG, DeVolder ML (eds): Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning. Assen, Van Gorcum, 1984.
  19. Elstein AS, Schulman LS, Sprafka SA: Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1978.
  20. Norman GR, Schmidt HG: The psychological basis of problem based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992;67:557–565.
  21. Martensen D, Eriksson H, Ingelman-Sundberg M: Medical chemistry: evaluation of active and problem-oriented teaching methods. Med Educ 1985;19:34–42.
  22. Schmidt HG, De Volder ML, De Grave WS, Moust JHC, Patel VL: Explanatory models in the processing of science text: the role of prior knowledge activation through small group discussion. J Educ Psychol 1989;81:610–619.

    External Resources

  23. Schulman LS: Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res 1986;15:4–14.
  24. Mayer R: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. Am Psychol 2004;59:14–19.
  25. Neville AJ: The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? Med Teach 1999;21:393–401.
  26. Schmidt HG, Loyens SMM, Van Gog T, Paas F: Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educ Psychol 2007;42:91–97.
  27. Hmelo-Silver C, Duncan RG, Chinn CA: Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educ Psychol 2007;42:99–107.
  28. Eva KW, Neville AJ, Norman SR: Exploring the etiology of content specificity: factors influencing analogical transfer and problem solving. Acad Med 1998;73:S1–S5.
  29. Schmidt HG: Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Med Educ 1983;17:11–16.
  30. Norman SR, Schmidt HG: Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000;34:721–728.
  31. Dolmans D: The effectiveness of PBL: the debate continues. Some concerns about the BEME movement. Med Educ 2003;37:1129–1130.
  32. Newman M: Fitness for purpose evaluation in problem based learning should consider the requirements for establishing descriptive causation. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006;11:391–402.
  33. Blaikie N: Designing Social Research. London, Polity Press, 2000.
  34. Colliver JA: Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: research and theory. Acad Med 2000;75:259–266.
  35. Albanese M: Problem-based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Med Educ 2000;34:729–738.
  36. Wolf FM: Problem-based learning and meta-analysis: can we see the forest through the trees? Acad Med 1993;68:542–544.
  37. Hmelo C, Evenson D: Introduction to problem-based learning: gaining insights on learning interactions through multiple methods of enquiry; in Evenson D, Hmelo C (eds): Problem-Based Learning – a Research Perspective on Learning Interactions. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 2000.
  38. Dochy F, Segers M, Van den Bossche P, Gijbelo D: Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr 2003;13:533–568.

    External Resources

  39. Norman G: Problem-based learning makes a difference. But why? CMAJ 2008;178:61–62.
  40. Neville AJ, Norman GR: PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades. Acad Med 2007;82:370–374.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Alan J. Neville
McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences
1200 Main Street West, MDCL 3110
Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5 (Canada)
Tel. +1 905 525 9140, ext. 22141, Fax +1 905 546 0349, E-Mail neville@mcmaster.ca


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: May 25, 2008
Revised: July 30, 2008
Published online: December 04, 2008
Number of Print Pages : 9
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 2, Number of References : 40


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Medical Principles and Practice (International Journal of the Kuwait University Health Sciences Centre)

Vol. 18, No. 1, Year 2009 (Cover Date: December 2008)

Journal Editor: Owunwanne A. (Kuwait)
ISSN: 1011–7571 (Print), eISSN: 1423–0151 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/MPP


Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.