Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 12, No. 2, 2009
Issue release date: November 2008
Section title: Original Paper
Public Health Genomics 2009;12:84–91
(DOI:10.1159/000164684)

Australian Study on Public Knowledge of Human Genetics and Health

Molster C. · Charles T. · Samanek A. · O’Leary P.
aOffice of Population Health Genomics, Health Policy and Clinical Reform Division, Department of Health, bSchool of Women’s and Infants’ Health, University of Western Australia, and cSchool of Public Health, Division of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, W.A., Australia

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restriction apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: 10/15/2008

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 1662-4246 (Print)
eISSN: 1662-8063 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PHG

Abstract

Aims: This study was designed to obtain data on public understanding of genetic concepts in the adult population of Western Australia. It explored knowledge of genetic risk of disease, inheritance, biology, determinism, and factors that predict relatively higher genetic knowledge within the general population. Method: A cross-sectional telephone survey of 1,009 respondents. Results: Most members of the Western Australian community are aware of basic genetic concepts and the link between genes, inheritance, and risk of disease. Significantly fewer understand the biological mechanisms underlying these concepts and there was some misconception around the meaning of ‘increased genetic risk’. The odds of higher genetic knowledge (>19 out of 24 questions correct) were greater among those with 12 years or more education (OR = 3.0), those aged 18–44 years (OR = 2.3), women (OR = 2.0), those with annual household income of AUD 80,000 or more (OR = 1.8), and those who had talked with someone (OR = 1.7) or searched the internet (OR = 1.6) for information on genes and health. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of an association between social location and public knowledge of human genetic concepts related to health and disease. This is consistent with previous findings and raises questions about the acquisition of textbook genetics knowledge within socio-cultural contexts. The impact of misconceptions about genetic concepts on the uptake of preventive health behaviors requires further investigation, as does the level of genetics knowledge that is required to empower informed participation in individual and societal decisions about genetics and health.


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: 10/15/2008

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 1662-4246 (Print)
eISSN: 1662-8063 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/PHG


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Scott S, Prior L, Wood F, Gray J: Repositioning the patient: the implications of being ‘at risk’. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1869–1879.
  2. Epstein CJ: Genetic testing: hope or hype? Genet Med 2004;6:165–172.
  3. Khoury M, Gwinn M, Burke W, Bowen S, Zimmern R: Will genomics widen or help heal the schism between medicine and public health? Am J Prev Med 2007;33:310–317.
  4. Khoury M, Gwinn M, Yoon P, Dowling N, Moore C, Bradley L: The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med 2007;9:665–674.
  5. Holtzman N: What role for public health in genetics and vice versa? Community Genet 2006;9:8–20.
  6. Brand A, Brand H, Schulte in den Bäumen T: The impact of genetics and genomics on public health. Eur J Hum Genet 2008;16:5–13.
  7. Jennings B: Genetic literacy and citizenship: possibilities for deliberative democratic policymaking in science and medicine. The Good Society 2004;13:38–44.
  8. Einsiedel E: The challenges of translating genomic knowledge. Clin Genet 2006;70:433–437.
  9. Bowling BV, Acra EE, Wang L, Myers MF, Dean GE, Markle GC, Moskalik CL, Huether CA: Development and evaluation of a genetic literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics 2008;178:15–22.
  10. Turner S: School science and its controversies; or, whatever happened to scientific literacy? Public Underst Sci 2008;17:55–72.
  11. McInerney J: Education in a genomic world. J Med Philos 2002;27:369–390.
  12. Kerr A, Cunningham-Burley S, Amos A: The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise. Public Underst Sci 1998;7:41–60.
  13. Wynne B: Knowledges in context. Sci Technol Human Values 1991;16:111–121.
  14. Allum N, Sturgis P, Tabourazi D, Brunton-Smith I: Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis. Public Underst Sci 2008;17:35–54.
  15. Sturgis P, Allum N: Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Underst Sci 2004;13:55–74.
  16. Smerecnik C, Mesters I, de Vries N, de Vries H: Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge. Genet Med 2008;10:251–258.
  17. Wang C, Bowen D, Kardia S: Research and practice opportunities at the intersection of health education, health behavior and genomics. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:686–701.
  18. Kardia S, Wang C: The role of health education and behavior in public health genetics. Health Educ Behav 2005;32:583–588.
  19. Etchegary H, Potter B, Howley H, Cappelli M, Coyle D, Graham I, Walker M, Wilson B: The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genet Test 2008;12:115–124.
  20. Richards M: Jack Tizard Memorial Lecture: Children’s understanding of inheritance and family. Child Psychol Psychiat Rev 2000;5:2–8.
  21. Lanie A, Jayaratne T, Sheldon J, Kardia S, Anderson E, Feldbaum M, Petty E: Exploring the public understanding of basic genetic concepts. J Genet Counsel 2004;13:305–320.
  22. Jallinoja P, Aro A: Knowledge about genes and heredity among Finns. N Genet Soc 1999;18:101–110.
  23. Henneman L, Timmermans D, Van der Wal G: Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information. Community Genet 2004;7:33–43.
  24. Furr LA, Kelly SE: The Genetic Knowledge Index: developing a standard measure of genetic knowledge. Genet Test 1999;3:193–199.
  25. Morris J, Gwinn M, Clyne M, Khoury M: Public knowledge regarding the role of genetic susceptibility to environmentally induced health conditions. Community Genet 2003;6:22–28.
  26. Nisselle A, Collins V, Gason A, Flouris A, Delatycki M, Allen K, Aitken M, Metcalfe S: Educational outcomes of a workplace screening program for genetic susceptibility to hemochromatosis. Clin Genet 2006;69:163–170.
  27. Rostant K, Steed L, O’Leary P: Survey of the knowledge, attitudes and experiences of Western Australian women in relation to prenatal screening and diagnostic procedures. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;43:134–138.
  28. Suriadi C, Jovanovska M, Quinlivan JA: Factors affecting mothers’ knowledge of genetic screening. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;44:30–34.
  29. Eureka Strategic Research. Public awareness research 2005 for Biotechnology Australia, 2005 (available at http://www.biotechnology.gov.au/assets/documents/bainternet/ EUREKA2005overview20051004180933.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  30. Sturgis P, Cooper H, Fife-Schaw C, Shepherd R: Genomic science: emerging public opinion; in Park A, Curtice J, Thomson K, Bromley C, Phillips M (eds): British Social Attitudes – the 21st Report. London, Sage, 2004, pp 119–145.
  31. Pardo R, Midden C, Miller J: Attitudes toward biotechnology in the European Union. J Biotechnol 2002;98:9–24.
  32. Sturgis P, Cooper H, Fife-Schaw C: Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public. New Genet Soc 2005;24:31–56.
  33. Gaskell G, Allum N, Bauer M, Jackson J, Howard S, Lindsay N: Ambivalent GM nation? Public attitudes to biotechnology in the UK, 1991–2002. Life Sciences in European Society Report. London School of Economics and Political Science (available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/ambivalent_gm_nation_uk.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  34. Gaskell G, Allum N, Stares S: Europeans and biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0. A report to the EC Directorate General for Research (available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_177_en.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  35. Park A, Curtice J, Thomson K, Jarvis L, Bromley C: The British Social Attitudes Survey: 18th report. London, Sage, 2001.
  36. Human Genetics Commission. Public attitudes to human genetic information: People’s Panel Quantitative Study (available at http://www.hgc.gov.uk/UploadDocs/DocPub/Document/morigeneticattitudes.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  37. National Public Health Partnership. Population Health Monitoring and Surveillance: Questions Development Field Testing – Field Test 1 Report – Asthma, Demographic Characteristics and Diabetes. Melbourne, National Public Health Partnership, 2003 (available at http://www.nphp.gov.au/ catitrg/documents/fieldtest01rpt.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  38. National Public Health Partnership. Population Health Monitoring and Surveillance: Question Development Field Testing – Field Test 2 Report – Alcohol Consumption, Cardiovascular Disease and Tobacco Consumption. Melbourne, National Public Health Partnership, 2004 (available at http://www.nphp.gov.au/catitrg/documents/fieldtest02rpt.pdf; accessed 08/25/08).
  39. Mesters I, Ausems A, de Vries H: General public’s knowledge, interest and information needs related to genetic cancer: An exploratory study. Eur J Cancer Prev 2005;14:69–75.
  40. Richards M: Lay and professional knowledge of genetics and inheritance. Public Underst Sci 1996;5:217–230.
  41. Bates B: Public culture and public understanding of genetics: a focus group study. Public Underst Sci 2005;14:47–65.
  42. Caulfield T: Introduction: genetic diversity and science communication. Clin Genet 2006;70:424–426.
  43. Bates B, Templeton A, Achter P, Harris T, Condit C: What does ‘a gene for heart disease’ mean? A focus group study of public understandings of genetic risk factors. Am J Med Genet 2003;119A:156–161.
  44. de Vries H, Mesters I, van de Steeg H, Honing C: The general public’s information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model. Patient Educ Couns 2005;56:154–165.
  45. Morris J, Gwinn M, Clyne M, Khoury M: Public knowledge regarding the role of genetic susceptibility to environmentally induced health conditions. Community Genet 2003;6:22–28.
  46. Rose A, Peters N, Shea J, Armstrong K: Attitudes and misconceptions about predictive genetic testing for cancer risk: a focus group study. Community Genet 2005;8:145–151.
  47. Keighley MR, O’Morain C, Giacosa A, Ashorn M, Burroughs A, Crespi M, Delvaux M, Faivre J, Hagenmuller F, Lamy V, Manger F, Mills HT, Neumann C, Nowak A, Pehrsson A, Smits S, Spencer K; United European Gastroenterology Federation Public Affairs Committee: Public awareness of risk factors and screening for colorectal cancer in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 2004;13:257–262.
  48. Waller J, McCaffery K, Wardle J: Beliefs about risk factors for cervical cancer in a British population sample. Prev Med 2004;38:745–753.
  49. Sturgis P: Knowledge and collective preferences: a comparison of two approaches to estimating the opinions of a better informed public. Sociol Method Res 2003;31:453–485.
  50. Cunningham-Burley S: Public knowledge and public trust. Community Genet 2006;9:204–210.
  51. Sanders T, Campbell R, Donovan J, Sharp D: Narrative accounts of hereditary risk: knowledge about family history, lay theories of disease and ‘internal’ and ‘external’ causation. Qual Health Res 2007;17:510–520.
  52. Cunningham C: The effect of teachers’ sociological understanding of science on curricular innovation. Res Sci Edu 1998;28:243–257.