Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 26, No. 6, 2008
Issue release date: December 2008
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008;26:483–489

Clock Drawing Test in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Quantitative Analysis of Four Scoring Methods and Qualitative Analysis

Lee K.S. · Kim E.A. · Hong C.H. · Lee D.-W. · Oh B.H. · Cheong H.-K.
aDepartment of Psychiatry, Yonsei University College of Medicine, bInstitution of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and cDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Inje University, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, dOccupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Incheon, eDepartment of Psychiatry, Ajou University School of Medicine, and fDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: The role of the clock drawing test (CDT) as a screening tool for dementia has been evaluated. However, studies focusing on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to verify the validity of the CDT as a screening method for MCI. Methods: 524 subjects aged 60 years and older were recruited in the community. Of these, 241 were diagnosed as not cognitively impaired (NCI) and 224 were classified as MCI. The CDT was scored according to the Freedman, Rouleau, Todd, and CERAD CDT and an additional comprehensive scoring system incorporating elements of most CDT for qualitative analysis. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the 4 CDT scoring systems for MCI ranged from 40.7 to 56.4% and from 71.8 to 85.3%, respectively. The likelihood ratio and the positive and negative predictive values of the 4 CDT ranged from 18 to 29, 18.2 to 24.5 and from 55.9 to 78.4%, respectively. In qualitative analysis, a significantly lower performance in the clock numbers category was observed in the MCI group. Conclusion: This study suggests that although some qualitative analyses could help in identifying MCI individuals, the CDT is insufficient as a screening method to distinguish MCI individuals from NCI individuals in a clinical setting.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Kirby M, Denihan A, Bruce I, et al: The Clock Drawing Test in primary care: sensitivity in dementia detection and specificity against normal and depressed elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2001;16:935–940.
  2. Shulman KI: Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screen screening test? Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 2000;15:548–561.
  3. Siu AL: Screening for dementia and investigating its causes. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:122–132.
  4. Powlishta KK, Von Dras DD, Stanford A, et al: The Clock Drawing Test is a poor screen for very mild dementia. Neurology 2002;59:898–903.
  5. Borson S, Brush M, Gil E, et al: The Clock Drawing Test: utility for dementia detection in multiethnic elders. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54:M534–M540.
  6. Kitabayashi Y, Ueda H, Narumoto J, Nakamura K, Kita H, Fukui K: Qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2001;55:485–491.
  7. Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N, Kennedy C, McGuife K: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain Cogn 1992;18:70–87.
  8. Cahn-Weiner DA, Williams K, Grace J, Tremont G, Westervelt H, Stern RA: Discrimination of dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease using the clock drawing test. Cogn Behav Neurol 2003;16:85–92.
  9. Heinik J, Lahav D, Drummer D, Vainer-Benajah Z, Lin R: Comparison of a clock drawing test in elderly schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease patients: a preliminary study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:638–643.
  10. Manos P: Ten-point clock test sensitivity for Alzheimer’s disease in patients with MMSE scores greater than 23. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999;14:454–458.
  11. Yamamoto S, Mogi N, Umegaki H, Suzuki Y, Ando F, Shimokata H, Iguchi A: The Clock Drawing Test as a valid screening method for mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;18:172–179.
  12. Babins L, Slater M-E, Whitehead V, Chertkow H: Can an 18-point clock-drawing scoring system predict dementia in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30:173–186.
  13. Brodaty H, Moore CM: The clock drawing test for dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997;12:619–627.
  14. Paganini-Hill A, Clark LJ, Henderson VW, et al: Clock drawing: analysis in a retirement community. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:941–947.
  15. Freedman M, Leach L, Kaplan E, Winocur G, Shulman KI, Delis DC: Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994.
  16. Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N, Kennedy C, McGuire K: Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease. Brain Cogn 1992;18:70–87.
  17. Todd ME, Dammers PM, Adams SG Jr, Todd HM, Morrison M: An examination of a proposed scoring procedure for the clock drawing test: reliability and predictive validity of the clock scoring system (CSS). Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 1995;10:22–26.

    External Resources

  18. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY: Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:47–53.
  19. Thalmann B, Spiegel R, Stähelin HB, Brubacher D, Ermini-Fünfschilling D, Bläsi S, Monsch AU: Dementia screening in general practice: optimised scoring for the Clock Drawing Test. Brain Aging 2002;2:36–43.
  20. Kang YW: Samsung neuropsychological screening battery; in Kang YW (ed): Current Research in Dementia. Seoul, The Korean Dementia Association, 1998, pp 99–107.
  21. Meyers JE, Meyers KR: The Meyers Scoring System for the Rey Complex Figure and the Recognition Trial. Professional Manual. Odessa, Psychological Assessment Resources, 1995.
  22. Kim H, Na DL: Normative data on the Korean version of the Boston Naming Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999;21:127–133.
  23. Cahn DA, Salmon DP, Monsch AU: Screening for dementia of the Alzheimer type in the community: the utility of the Clock Drawing Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1996;11:529–539.
  24. Lam LC, Chiu HF, Ng KO, Chan C, Chan WF, Li SW, Wong M: Clock-face drawing, reading and setting tests in the screening of dementia in Chinese elderly adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1998;53:353–357.
  25. Ratcliff G, Dodge H, Birzescu M, Ganguli M: Tracking cognitive functioning over time: ten-year longitudinal data from a community-based study. Appl Neuropsychol 2003;10:76–88.
  26. Ainslie NK, Murden RA: Effect of education on the clock-drawing dementia screen in non-demented elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:249–252.
  27. Tuokko H, Hadjistavropoulos T, Miller JA, Beattie BL: The Clock Test: a sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:579–584.
  28. Watson YI, Arfken CL, Birge SJ: Clock completion: an objective screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1235–1240.
  29. Schramm U, Berger G, Müller R, Kratzsch T, Peters J, Frölich L: Psychometric properties of Clock Drawing Test and MMSE or Short Performance Test (SKT) in dementia screening in a memory clinic population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17:254–260.
  30. Seigerschmidt E, Mösch E, Siemen M, Förstl H, Bickel H: The clock drawing test and questionable dementia: reliability and validity. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17:1048–1054.
  31. Libon DJ, Malamut BL, Swenson R, Sands LP, Cloud BS: Further analyses of clock drawings among demented and nondemented older subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1996;11:193–205.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50