Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 75, Suppl. 1, 2008
Issue release date: December 2008
Section title: Paper
Oncology 2008;75:91–98
(DOI:10.1159/000173429)

PIVKA-II Is the Best Prognostic Predictor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy

Takahashi S. · Kudo M. · Chung H. · Inoue T. · Ishikawa E. · Kitai S. · Tatsumi C. · Ueda T. · Nagai T. · Minami Y. · Ueshima K.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan

Do you have an account?

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

Register and profit from personalized services (MyKarger) Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information









I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger (new!)
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
  • Reduced rates with a PPV account
read more

Direct: USD 38.00
Account: USD 26.50

Select

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restriction apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Automatic perpetual access to all articles of the subscribed year(s)
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: 12/17/2008

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0030-2414 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0232 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OCL

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic predictor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated clinical outcomes in a cohort of 179 Child-Pugh stage A cirrhotic patients who received curative RFA for naive HCC within Milan criteria. The median follow-up period was 40.5 months. Results: The cumulative survival rate was significantly lower in patients with prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) ≥100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (58.0 vs. 84.0% at 5 years; p < 0.001). The cumulative recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower in patients with PIVKA-II ≥100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (12.1 vs. 16.9% at 5 years; p < 0.032). The cumulative rate of maintaining period within Milan criteria was significantly lower in patients with PIVKA-II ≥100 mAU/ml compared with PIVKA-II <100 mAU/ml (34.1 vs. 55.6% at 5 years; p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dl; p = 0.002, RR 3.75, CI 1.64–8.56), a high level of PIVKA-II (≥100 mAU/ml; p = 0.04, RR 3.15, CI 1.45–6.87), and multiple nodules (p = 0.021, RR 2.61, CI 1.15–5.91) were independently significant mortality risk factors. Conclusion: In patients with Child-Pugh stage A HCC, the PIVKA-II level is the best prognostic predictor after curative RFA.


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: 12/17/2008

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0030-2414 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0232 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OCL


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.