Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 22, No. 3, 2000
Issue release date: May–June (July 2000)
Dev Neurosci 2000;22:217–227

Timing and Competence of Neural Crest Formation

Basch M.L. · Selleck M.A.J. · Bronner-Fraser M.
a Division of Biology 139-74, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., and bDepartment of Cell and Neurobiology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif., USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Neural crest cells can be induced by an interaction between neural plate and ectoderm. To clarify the timing and nature of these inductive interactions, we have examined the time of competence of the neural plate to become neural crest as well as the time of neural fold specification. The neural plate is competent to respond to inductive interactions with the nonneural ectoderm for a limited period, rapidly losing its responsive ability after stage 10. In contrast, nonneural ectoderm from numerous stages retains the ability to induce neural crest cells from competent neural plate. When neural folds are explanted to test their ability to produce neural crest without further tissue interactions, we find that folds derived from all rostrocaudal levels of the open neural plate are already specified to express the neural crest marker Slug. However, additional signals may be required for maintenance of Slug expression, since the transcript is later down-regulated in vitro in the absence of tissue interactions. Taken together, these results suggest that there are multiple stages of neural crest induction. The earliest induction must have occurred by the end of gastrulation, since the newly formed neural fold population is already specified to form neural crest. However, isolated neural folds eventually down-regulate Slug, suggesting a second phase that maintains neural crest formation. Thus, induction of the neural crest may involve multiple and sustained tissue interactions.

Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Artinger KB, Bronner-Fraser M (1992): Partial restriction in the developmental potential of late emigrating avian neural crest cells. Dev Biol 149:149–157.
  2. Artinger KB, Bronner-Fraser M (1993): Delayed formation of the floor plate after ablation of the avian notochord. Neuron 11:1147–1161.
  3. Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser S (1988): Cell lineage analysis shows multipotentiality of some avian neural crest cells. Nature 335:161–164.
  4. Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser S (1989): Developmental potential of avian trunk neural crest cells in situ. Neuron 3:755–766.
  5. Dickinson M, Selleck M, McMahon A, Bronner-Fraser M (1995): Dorsalization of the neural tube by the non-neural ectoderm. Development 121:2099–2106.
  6. Duprez D, Bella E, Richardson M, Archer C, Wolpert L, Brickell P, Francis-West P (1996): Overexpression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 alters the size and shape of developing skeletal elements in the chick limb. Mech Dev 57:145–157.
  7. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951): A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88:49–92.
  8. Henrique D, Adam J, Myat A, Chitnis A, Lewis J, Ish-Horowicz D (1995): Expression of a Delta homologue in prospective neurons in the chick. Nature 375:787–790.
  9. LaBonne C, Bronner-Fraser M (1998): Neural crest induction in Xenopus: Evidence for a two signal model. Development 125:2403–2414.
  10. LaBonne C, Bronner-Fraser M (2000): In Xenopus, Snail-related transcriptional repressors are required for both the induction of the neural crest and its subsequent migration Dev Biol (in press).
  11. LeDouarin NM (l982): The Neural Crest. London, Cambridge University Press.
  12. Liem KF, Tremml G, Jessell TM (1997): A role for the roof plate and its resident TGF-beta-related proteins in neuronal patterning in the dorsal spinal cord. Cell 91:127–138.
  13. Liem KF Jr, Tremml G, Roelink H, Jessell TM (1995): Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm. Cell 82:969–979.
  14. Moury JD, Jacobson AG (1990): The origins of neural crest cells in the axolotl. Dev Biol 141:243–253.
  15. Nieto MA, Patel K, Wilkinson D (1996): In situ hybridization analysis of chick embryos in whole mount and tissue sections; in Bronner-Fraser M (ed): Methods in Avian Embryology. Methods in Cell Biology. San Diego, Academic Press, vol 51, pp 220–235.
  16. Nieto MA, Sargent MG, Wilkinson DG, Cooke J (1994): Control of cell behaviour during vertebrate development by Slug, a zinc finger gene. Science 264:835–839.
  17. Rosenquist GC (1981): Epiblast origin and early migration of neural crest cells in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 87:201–211.
  18. Savagner P, Yamada KM, Thiery JP (1997): The zinc-finger protein slug causes desmosome dissociation, an initial and necessary step for growth factor-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol 137:1403–1419.
  19. Sechrist J, Nieto A, Zamanian R, Bronner-Fraser M (1995): Regulative response of the cranial neural tube after neural fold ablation: Spatiotemporal nature of neural crest generation and up-regulation of Slug. Development 121:4103–4135.
  20. Selleck MAJ, Bronner-Fraser M (1995): Origins of the avian neural crest: The role of neural plate/epidermal interactions. Development 121:525–538.
  21. Selleck MAJ, Garcia-Castro M, Artinger KB, Bronner-Fraser M (1998): Effects of Shh and noggin on neural crest formation demonstrate that BMP is required in the neural tube but not ectoderm. Development 125:4919–4930.
  22. Slack JMW (1991): From Egg to Embryo: Regional Specification on Early Development, ed 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  23. Tessier-Lavigne M, Placzek M, Lumsden A, Dodd J, Jessell TM (1987): Chemotropic guidance of developing axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Nature 336:775–778.
  24. Watanabe Y, LeDouarin NM (1996): A role for BMP-4 in the development of subcutaneous cartilage. Mech Dev 57:69–78.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 9.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 8.00