Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 112, No. 3, 2009
Issue release date: June 2009
Nephron Clin Pract 2009;112:c177–c183
(DOI:10.1159/000218106)

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Outcome of Chinese Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura-Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A 9-Year Retrospective Study

Zhang W. · Shi H. · Ren H. · Shen P.-Y. · Pan X.-X. · Li X. · Chen Y.-X. · Xu Y.-W. · Chen X.-N. · Zhu P. · Chen N.
Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
email Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS) is unclear and the prognosis is poor. Few studies have been published focusing on Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. We performed a retrospective study on the clinical characteristics and outcome of Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. Method: Patients with TTP-HUS, admitted to our hospital from 1998 to 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were 26 females and 6 males in our study. Fifteen patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS; 1 had antiphospholipid syndrome-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had drug-associated TTP-HUS; 4 had malignant angionephrosclerosis- associated TTP-HUS; 3 had vasculitis-associated TTP-HUS, and the remaining 5 had idiopathic TTP-HUS. Twenty-six patients had acute kidney injury and 21 had nephrotic syndrome. Hypertension was found in 31 patients. For the treatment, 15 patients had plasmapheresis, 12 had continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and 14 had hemodialysis. Eighteen patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Corticosteroids were used in patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS. For the patients with SLE-associated TTP-HUS, corticosteroids and immunosuppressant were used. Outcome was poor: 6 patients died; 17 recovered from renal insufficiency; 5 progressed to chronic renal failure, and 4 were dependent on hemodialysis. Conclusions: Most of our patients had secondary TTP-HUS. SLE-associated TTP-HUS is the most common form of TTP-HUS. Early diagnosis and treatment can improve prognosis. An immunosuppressant together with corticosteroids could improve prognosis in some patients.


 Outline


 goto top of outline Key Words

  • Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
  • Hemolytic uremic syndrome
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Renal failure, acute
  • Kidney injury, acute
  • Plasmapheresis

 goto top of outline Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS) is unclear and the prognosis is poor. Few studies have been published focusing on Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. We performed a retrospective study on the clinical characteristics and outcome of Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. Method: Patients with TTP-HUS, admitted to our hospital from 1998 to 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were 26 females and 6 males in our study. Fifteen patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS; 1 had antiphospholipid syndrome-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had drug-associated TTP-HUS; 4 had malignant angionephrosclerosis- associated TTP-HUS; 3 had vasculitis-associated TTP-HUS, and the remaining 5 had idiopathic TTP-HUS. Twenty-six patients had acute kidney injury and 21 had nephrotic syndrome. Hypertension was found in 31 patients. For the treatment, 15 patients had plasmapheresis, 12 had continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and 14 had hemodialysis. Eighteen patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Corticosteroids were used in patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS. For the patients with SLE-associated TTP-HUS, corticosteroids and immunosuppressant were used. Outcome was poor: 6 patients died; 17 recovered from renal insufficiency; 5 progressed to chronic renal failure, and 4 were dependent on hemodialysis. Conclusions: Most of our patients had secondary TTP-HUS. SLE-associated TTP-HUS is the most common form of TTP-HUS. Early diagnosis and treatment can improve prognosis. An immunosuppressant together with corticosteroids could improve prognosis in some patients.

Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


goto top of outline Introduction

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS) is characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, acute renal failure and central nervous system impairment [1, 2]. Though thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia are sufficient to establish a clinical diagnosis, these criteria do not distinguish TTP from HUS. Hence, the comprehensive term TTP-HUS is appropriate to diagnose patients with such symptoms [3]. The incidence of TTP-HUS is less than 5% among all patients with acute renal failure [4]. The pathogenesis of the disease is still unclear and the prognosis is poor. Due to improved strategies of treatment, the survival rate of patients with TTP-HUS has risen significantly. With adequate treatment, the survival rate of patients with TTP-HUS could reach 90–93% and renal survival could reach 50–60% [3,5,6,7,8,9,10].

To date, little is known about the characteristics and outcome of Chinese patients with TTP-HUS, and few studies have been published focusing on those patients. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 32 Chinese patients with TTP-HUS in order to further study the characteristics of Chinese patients with the disease.

 

goto top of outline Patients and Methods

goto top of outline Selection Criteria

Thirty-two patients with TTP-HUS admitted to the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between July 1998 and December 2006 were retrospectively analyzed in this study.

The diagnostic criteria of TTP-HUS were based on the following items [3, 11, 12]: (1) microangiopathic hemolytic anemia as indicated by the presence of schizocytosis >2% on peripheral smear, low haptoglobin values, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and blood uric acid values, reticulocytosis, negative Coomb’s test, and high bilirubin values; (2) thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100×109/dl), and (3) renal involvement as indicated by hematuria, proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome, acute kidney injury (AKI), elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels, oliguria or anuria.

Renal pathology: Glomerular microthrombi composed of platelet aggregates and fibrin; endothelial cell swelling; stenosis of capillary lumens; microthrombi in glomerular capillaries or in renal small arteries.

The diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were made according to the definitions of the American College of Rheumatology [13]. The diagnostic criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were defined by the International Consensus Conference (Sapporo, 1998) and Sydney criteria [14, 15]. The clinical diagnosis of idiopathic TTP-HUS was made when other known causes had been eliminated [16, 17]. The diagnostic criteria for malignant hypertension were: diastolic blood pressure >120 mm Hg with retinal (hemorrhage, papilledema), brain, kidney, or heart damage (left-ventricular heart failure, hypertensive encephalopathy).

goto top of outline Laboratory Data

All patients were tested for complete blood count, routine biochemical workup, coagulation studies, urine test and LDH. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CG-GFR) = (140 – age) × weight/72 × Scr (×0.85 if female) [18]. AKI was evaluated according to the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group guidelines [19, 20].

goto top of outline Renal Pathology

Renal biopsy specimens were processed for light microscopy, immunofluorescence (IF) and electron microscopy. The direct IF technique using antibodies against IgA, IgG, IgM, C3, C4, C1q and fibrin was processed for the IF study.

goto top of outline Treatment

Plasma exchange (PE), continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)/hemodialysis (HD) or intravenous immunoglobulin was used in different forms of TTP-HUS. Adjuvant therapies such as immunosuppressants, steroids or antiplatelet agents were added according to pathogenesis of the disease.

goto top of outline Statistical Methods

All data were computed using SAS 6.04. Differences in quantitative parameters between groups were performed by t test (for normally distributed data) or non-parametric test (for not normally distributed data). All the measurement data are expressed as mean ± SD. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

goto top of outline Results

goto top of outline Demographic Features, Clinical and Laboratory Presentation at Diagnosis

Thirty-two patients with TTP-HUS were retrospectively analyzed. They represented 3.24% (32/989) of all AKI patients in our hospital during that period. The duration between disease onset and diagnosis was 1–260 days. Twenty-six cases presented with AKI (5 in AKI phase I, 4 in phase II and 17 in phase III), 3 presented with chronic renal failure, and the remaining 3 presented with normal renal function. Five patients had oliguria (urine output <400 ml/24 h) and 4 patients had anuria (urine output <100 ml/24 h) with duration of 6–55 days.

For the pathogenesis of the disease: 15 patients had SLE-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS; 1 had APS-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had drug-associated TTP-HUS (ticlopidine and mitomycin associated); 4 had malignant angionephrosclerosis-associated TTP-HUS; 3 had vasculitis-associated TTP-HUS (2 with MPA and 1 with allergic purpura), and the remaining 5 patients had idiopathic TTP-HUS.

In our study, only 1 patient had diarrhea at onset of disease; she was negative for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. No patient in our study presented with central nervous system involvement at diagnosis. Details of the clinical and laboratory presentation were summarized in table 1.

TAB01
Table 1. Characteristics of the patients with TTP-HUS at diagnosis

goto top of outline Renal Pathology

Twenty-five (78.1%) patients had renal biopsy. In 12 patients, capillary wall thickening, endothelial cell swelling and stenosis of the capillary lumens were the major pathological lesions. Schistocytes, platelets and fibrin thrombi could also be found in the glomerular capillaries. Some patients had mesangiolysis, interstitial edema and inflammatory cell infiltration. In 10 patients, chronic lesions such as glomerular basement membrane thickening and atrophy or sclerosis of glomerular tufts were found. One patient had renal infarction and 2 presented with acute tubular necrosis. Of the 15 patients with lupus nephritis, 14 cases had type IV and 1 had type III+V. Endothelial cell swelling, schistocytes or thrombi in the capillary lumens could be found by electron microscopy.

goto top of outline Treatment

PE was performed in patients with severe TTP-HUS (hematocrit <20%, platelets <100 × 109/ml, LDH >6,001 IU/l, Scr >442 μmol/l). Fifteen patients were treated with plasmapheresis (double filtration plasmapheresis in 13 cases and single plasmapheresis in 2 cases) 3–6 times every other day (blood flow 100–150 ml/min; 30–50 mg heparin at start of plasmapheresis followed by continuous infusion of 8–10 mg/h). Among those patients, 12 underwent CVVHDF, 14 had HD (9 had CVVHDF in the acute phase and HD afterwards), 9 had PE in combination with CVVHDF and/or HD. Eighteen cases were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (400 mg/day); among those patients, 12 were also treated with PE. Platelet transfusion was not used. Eight patients were administered transfusion of washed red blood cells due to severe anemia. No antiplatelet agents were used in these patients except for those with APS. In patients with autoimmune disease-associated TTP-HUS (SLE-associated TTP-HUS, vasculitis-associated TTP-HUS and APS-associated TTP-HUS), corticosteroids (1 mg/kg/day) together with immunosuppressants (cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil or vincristine) were administered. Corticosteroids (10–40 mg/day) and vincristine (1–2 mg/day, 4 times total) were used in patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS. In patients with APS, low molecular weight heparins and aspirin were added. Details of treatment are summarized in table 2.

TAB02
Table 2. Outcome of patients with TTP-HUS

goto top of outline Outcome

The follow-up of 32 TTP-HUS patients was 46.0 ± 32.8 (range 3–112) months. Six died during follow-up: 4 had TTP-HUS secondary to severely active SLE, 1 had idiopathic TTP-HUS and 1 had mitomycin-associated TTP-HUS. The duration between disease onset and diagnosis of those 6 patients was more than 1 month. Two patients died of Gram-negative sepsis, 1 died of fungal pneumonia, and 3 refused further treatment and died due to complications of end-stage renal disease.

Seventeen patients recovered from renal insufficiency. Five patients progressed to chronic renal failure independent of dialysis, and 4 ultimately depended on HD.

The survival rate in patients with SLE-associated TTP-HUS and other forms of TTP-HUS was 73.3 and 88.2%, respectively. Renal survival in patients with SLE-associated TTP-HUS and other forms of TTP-HUS was 60.0 and 47.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference with regard to survival rate and renal survival in those patients (p > 0.05).

 

goto top of outline Discussion

The purpose of our study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcome of Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. For this purpose, we first reviewed the literature, and compared the etiology between our patients and Caucasian patients (table 3).

TAB03
Table 3. Comparison of etiology of patients with TTP-HUS

The current study showed that nearly half of our patients (15/32, 46.9%) had SLE-associated TTP-HUS. It was the most common form of the disease among our patients. Idiopathic TTP-HUS accounted for 15.6% (5/32) only. However, in the studies published elsewhere, idiopathic TTP-HUS was one of the most common forms of the disease which accounted for 27–40% of the patients [4, 6, 21]. Atypical HUS affected about 5–10% of all patients with TTP-HUS according to literature [22,23,24]; however, no patient was diagnosed as typical TTP-HUS in our study. The etiological differences of the disease might be related to racial differences between the Asian population and Caucasians.

We did not detect ADAMTS13 in our study, as this detection method is not available in our region, thus some of our patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS could have had an associated genetic defect of the complement system. Usually, a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency could be specific for TTP [3, 25] and patients described as having HUS did not have or rarely had an associated ADAMTS13 deficiency [26,27,28]. However, recent studies demonstrated that HUS patients with acute renal failure could also have an ADAMTS13 deficiency [3, 29]. Therefore, it was proposed that an ADAMTS13 deficiency might not be detected in all patients who are appropriately diagnosed as TTP-HUS, and it could serve as prognostic factor of the disease [3].

Two of our patients had pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS. During pregnancy, preeclampsia, placental abruption and increased production of blood coagulation factors could injure the endothelial cells and thus cause dysfunction of the coagulation system, which may finally lead to local diffuse intravascular clotting, glomerular microthrombi and subendothelial fibrin deposition [30, 31]. Most pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS occurs in the last trimester and at about the time of delivery [17]. In our study, a young female patient had AKI, loin pain, gross hematuria, pulmonary embolism and congestive heart failure after delivery. The laboratory tests showed anticardiolipin antibody-IgG (+) and anti-β2-GPI antibody (+), an increased level of reticulocytes, serum LDH, schistocytosis, and a decreased level of platelets and haptoglobin. She was diagnosed as having APS-associated TTP-HUS. It was reported that 61% of TTP-HUS patients have APS [32], which implies the importance of screening for APS in TTP-HUS patients.

AKI is the major manifestation of renal involvement in TTP-HUS patients. Gross or microscopic hematuria and proteinuria may also be present in TTP-HUS patients with renal involvement. Some patients could present with nephrotic syndrome, hypertension, oliguria or anuria and renal insufficiency. It was reported that 80% of patients depend on HD during the acute phase [6]. In our study, 81.3% (26/32) of the patients had AKI at the onset of disease. Nephrotic syndrome and hypertension were found in 65.6 and 96.8% of our patients, respectively. All the patients had microscopic hematuria; most of them had gross hematuria and fever at presentation.

Treatment of TTP-HUS should be administered according to the pathogenesis of the disease. PE is the gold standard therapy for idiopathic TTP-HUS which may be live-saving in genetic forms. It is also useful in treating several forms of TTP-HUS [3, 7, 10, 16,33,34,35]. In our study, after PE therapy, the level of hemoglobin, platelets, reticulocyte count and haptoglobin improved in 15 patients with severe TTP-HUS. However, renal function did not improve after PE. Six patients died during PE and CVVHDF/HD therapy. Their deaths might be attributed to the severe organ involvement and delayed treatment. It was reported that PE in combination with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion was useful in the treatment of patients with TTP-HUS [4, 5, 8]. Since FFP transfusion can supply the activating factor of ADAMST13, while PE alone can remove inhibitory factors, further study is needed to investigate the beneficial effects of FFP transfusion therapy in the treatment of severe TTP-HUS. In patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS, PE together with vincristine and steroids was reported to be useful for the prevention of relapses and shortening the duration of the idiopathic form [11, 16,35,36,37]. However, the corticosteroid doses in the treatment of TTP-HUS have not yet found consensus [11, 16]. In some studies, long-term and low doses of corticosteroids were recommended while others suggested a high dose of corticosteroids followed by a tapering schedule [4, 5, 8, 35]. As there are few studies on corticosteroids in combination with other treatments, further studies are necessary to evaluate the therapeutic effects of different doses of corticosteroids. As the etiology of TTP-HUS is heterogeneous, adopting a therapeutic strategy according to the patient’s clinical situation is important to improve prognosis. In our own experience, HD or CVVHDF is necessary to improve outcome in patients with water retention, disturbance of electrolytes, oliguria, anuria, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, heart failure or pulmonary edema.

In the literature, patients with TTP-HUS could have vascular lesions and some could progress to end stage renal disease. The prognosis was poor and some depended on dialysis [38,39,40]. In our study, the mortality rate was 18.8%, which was higher than the rates reported in the literature [4, 6, 9, 11, 41]. Considering the severe clinical situation of our patients, the outcome of our patients with TTP-HUS was poorer.

Prognostic factors in TTP-HUS are not well established due to the rarity of the disease. In our study as well as some others, no clinical features at diagnosis were predictive for survival (data not shown) [9, 10, 42]. However, it was reported that advanced age, low hemoglobin level, high leukocyte count, HD, positive HIV serology, and neurological features are prognostic factors of TTP-HUS [4, 6, 11]. Since our study focused on data from Chinese patients with TTP-HUS, further study is needed to analyze the prognostic factors of TTP-HUS in other Asian populations.

In summary, TTP-HUS is a disease with a poor prognosis. SLE-associated TTP-HUS is the most common form of TTP-HUS in Chinese patients. Early recognition and adequate treatment is necessary to improve outcome.

 

goto top of outline Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Leading Academic Discipline Project of Shanghai Health Bureau (No. 05III001) and a grant from the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (No. T0201).


 goto top of outline References
  1. Coppo P, Veyradier A, Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Scrobohaci ML, Amesland F, Bussel A: Pathophysiology of thrombotic microangiopathies: current understanding (in French). Ann Med Interne (Paris) 2002;153:153–166.
  2. Hosler GA, Cusumano AM, Hutchins GM: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome are distinct pathologic entities. A review of 56 autopsy cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:834–839.
  3. Vesely SK, George JN, Lammle B, Studt JD, Alberio L, El-Harake MA, Raskob GE: ADAMTS13 activity in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome: relation to presenting features and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of 142 patients. Blood 2003;102:60–68.
  4. Tostivint I, Mougenot B, Flahault A, Vigneau C, Costa MA, Haymann JP, Sraer JD, Rondeau E: Adult haemolytic and uraemic syndrome: causes and prognostic factors in the last decade. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:1228–1234.
  5. Elliott MA, Nichols WL: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:1154–1162.
  6. Hollenbeck M, Kutkuhn B, Aul C, Leschke M, Willers R, Grabensee B: Haemolytic-uraemic syndrome and thrombotic-thrombocytopenic purpura in adults: clinical findings and prognostic factors for death and end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:76–81.
  7. George JN: How I treat patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2000;96:1223–1229.
  8. Bell WR, Braine HG, Ness PM, Kickler TS: Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clinical experience in 108 patients. N Engl J Med 1991;325:398–403.
  9. Hayward CP, Sutton DM, Carter WH Jr, Campbell ED, Scott JG, Francombe WH, Shumak KH, Baker MA: Treatment outcomes in patients with adult thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:982–987.
  10. Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, Blanchette VS, Kelton JG, Nair RC, Spasoff RA: Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Canadian Apheresis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991;325:393–397.
  11. Dervenoulas J, Tsirigotis P, Bollas G, Pappa V, Xiros N, Economopoulos T, Pappa M, Mellou S, Kostourou A, Papageorgiou E, Raptis SA: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS): treatment outcome, relapses, prognostic factors. A single-center experience of 48 cases. Ann Hematol 2000;79:66–72.
  12. Elliott EJ, Robins-Browne RM, O’Loughlin EV, Bennett-Wood V, Bourke J, Henning P, Hogg GG, Knight J, Powell H, Redmond D: Nationwide study of haemolytic uraemic syndrome: clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological features. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:125–131.
  13. Hochberg MC: Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
  14. Lockshin MD: Update on antiphospholipid syndrome. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2006;64:57–59.

    External Resources

  15. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, PG DEG, Koike T, Meroni PL, Reber G, Shoenfeld Y, Tincani A, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Krilis SA: International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295–306.
  16. Allford SL, Hunt BJ, Rose P, Machin SJ: Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of the thrombotic microangiopathic haemolytic anaemias. Br J Haematol 2003;120:556–573.
  17. Besbas N, Karpman D, Landau D, et al: A classification of hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related disorders. Kidney Int 2006;70:423–431.
  18. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31–41.
  19. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P: Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004;8:R204–R212.
  20. Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Lameire N: Defining acute renal failure: rifle and beyond. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;1:1314–1319.
  21. George JN, Kremer Hovinga JA, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, Lammle B: The Oklahoma thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome registry: the Swiss connection. Eur J Haematol 2008;80:277–286.
  22. Zimmerhackl LB, Scheiring J, Prufer F, Taylor CM, Loirat C: Renal transplantation in HUS patients with disorders of complement regulation. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:10–16.
  23. Siegler RL, Pavia AT, Hansen FL, Christofferson RD, Cook JB: Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a comparison with postdiarrheal disease. J Pediatr 1996;128:505–511.
  24. Gordjani N, Sutor AH, Zimmerhackl LB, Brandis M: Hemolytic uremic syndromes in childhood. Semin Thromb Hemost 1997;23:281–293.
  25. Bianchi V, Robles R, Alberio L, Furlan M, Lammle B: Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) in thrombocytopenic disorders: a severely deficient activity is specific for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2002;100:710–713.
  26. Mori Y, Wada H, Gabazza EC, Minami N, Nobori T, Shiku H, Yagi H, Ishizashi H, Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y: Predicting response to plasma exchange in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with measurement of VWF-cleaving protease activity. Transfusion 2002;42:572–580.
  27. Furlan M, Robles R, Galbusera M, Remuzzi G, Kyrle PA, Brenner B, Krause M, Scharrer I, Aumann V, Mittler U, Solenthaler M, Lammle B: Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1578–1584.
  28. Veyradier A, Obert B, Houllier A, Meyer D, Girma JP: Specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease in thrombotic microangiopathies: a study of 111 cases. Blood 2001;98:1765–1772.
  29. Remuzzi G, Galbusera M, Noris M, Canciani MT, Daina E, Bresin E, Contaretti S, Caprioli J, Gamba S, Ruggenenti P, Perico N, Mannucci PM: Von Willebrand factor cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) is deficient in recurrent and familial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2002;100:778–785.
  30. McMinn JR, George JN: Evaluation of women with clinically suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome during pregnancy. J Clin Apher 2001;16:202–209.
  31. George JN: The association of pregnancy with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Curr Opin Hematol 2003;10:339–344.
  32. Espinosa G, Bucciarelli S, Cervera R, Lozano M, Reverter JC, de la Red G, Gil V, Ingelmo M, Font J, Asherson RA: Thrombotic microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and antiphospholipid antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:730–736.
  33. Bosch T, Wendler T: Extracorporeal plasma treatment in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome: a review. Ther Apher 2001;5:182–185.
  34. Ruggenenti P, Noris M, Remuzzi G: Thrombotic microangiopathy, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Kidney Int 2001;60:831–846.
  35. Rock GA: Management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol 2000;109:496–507.
  36. Durand JM, Lefevre P, Kaplanski G, Telle H, Soubeyrand J: Vincristine for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet 1992;340:977–978.
  37. Lefevre P, Durand JM, Blanc AP, Guidon C, Peyron C, Alazia M, Prince-Zucchelli MA, Mongin M: Value of vincristine in the treatment of thrombotic thrombopenic purpura (in French). Presse Med 1986;15:77.
  38. Morel-Maroger L, Kanfer A, Solez K, Sraer JD, Richet G: Prognostic importance of vascular lesions in acute renal failure with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (hemolytic-uremic syndrome): clinicopathologic study in 20 adults. Kidney Int 1979;15:548–558.
  39. Descombes E, Droz D, Drouet L, Grunfeld JP, Lesavre P: Renal vascular lesions in lupus nephritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997;76:355–368.
  40. Hughson MD, Nadasdy T, McCarty GA, Sholer C, Min KW, Silva F: Renal thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and the antiphospholipid syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 1992;20:150–158.
  41. Pollock KG, Young D, Beattie TJ, Todd WT: Clinical surveillance of thrombotic microangiopathies in Scotland, 2003–2005. Epidemiol Infect 2008;136:115–121.
  42. Thompson CE, Damon LE, Ries CA, Linker CA: Thrombotic microangiopathies in the 1980s: clinical features, response to treatment, and the impact of the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic. Blood 1992;80:1890–1895.

 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Prof. Nan Chen, MD
Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 (PR China)
Tel. +86 21 6437 0045/ext. 665 233, Fax +86 21 6445 6419
E-Mail chen-nan@medmail.com.cn


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: July 8, 2008
Accepted: November 24, 2008
Published online: May 13, 2009
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 42


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Nephron Clinical Practice

Vol. 112, No. 3, Year 2009 (Cover Date: June 2009)

Journal Editor: El Nahas M. (Sheffield)
ISSN: 1660-2110 (Print), eISSN: 1660-2110 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEC


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP-HUS) is unclear and the prognosis is poor. Few studies have been published focusing on Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. We performed a retrospective study on the clinical characteristics and outcome of Chinese patients with TTP-HUS. Method: Patients with TTP-HUS, admitted to our hospital from 1998 to 2006, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were 26 females and 6 males in our study. Fifteen patients had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had pregnancy-associated TTP-HUS; 1 had antiphospholipid syndrome-associated TTP-HUS; 2 had drug-associated TTP-HUS; 4 had malignant angionephrosclerosis- associated TTP-HUS; 3 had vasculitis-associated TTP-HUS, and the remaining 5 had idiopathic TTP-HUS. Twenty-six patients had acute kidney injury and 21 had nephrotic syndrome. Hypertension was found in 31 patients. For the treatment, 15 patients had plasmapheresis, 12 had continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and 14 had hemodialysis. Eighteen patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Corticosteroids were used in patients with idiopathic TTP-HUS. For the patients with SLE-associated TTP-HUS, corticosteroids and immunosuppressant were used. Outcome was poor: 6 patients died; 17 recovered from renal insufficiency; 5 progressed to chronic renal failure, and 4 were dependent on hemodialysis. Conclusions: Most of our patients had secondary TTP-HUS. SLE-associated TTP-HUS is the most common form of TTP-HUS. Early diagnosis and treatment can improve prognosis. An immunosuppressant together with corticosteroids could improve prognosis in some patients.



 goto top of outline Author Contacts

Prof. Nan Chen, MD
Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025 (PR China)
Tel. +86 21 6437 0045/ext. 665 233, Fax +86 21 6445 6419
E-Mail chen-nan@medmail.com.cn


 goto top of outline Article Information

Received: July 8, 2008
Accepted: November 24, 2008
Published online: May 13, 2009
Number of Print Pages : 7
Number of Figures : 0, Number of Tables : 3, Number of References : 42


 goto top of outline Publication Details

Nephron Clinical Practice

Vol. 112, No. 3, Year 2009 (Cover Date: June 2009)

Journal Editor: El Nahas M. (Sheffield)
ISSN: 1660-2110 (Print), eISSN: 1660-2110 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEC


Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Coppo P, Veyradier A, Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Scrobohaci ML, Amesland F, Bussel A: Pathophysiology of thrombotic microangiopathies: current understanding (in French). Ann Med Interne (Paris) 2002;153:153–166.
  2. Hosler GA, Cusumano AM, Hutchins GM: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome are distinct pathologic entities. A review of 56 autopsy cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2003;127:834–839.
  3. Vesely SK, George JN, Lammle B, Studt JD, Alberio L, El-Harake MA, Raskob GE: ADAMTS13 activity in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome: relation to presenting features and clinical outcomes in a prospective cohort of 142 patients. Blood 2003;102:60–68.
  4. Tostivint I, Mougenot B, Flahault A, Vigneau C, Costa MA, Haymann JP, Sraer JD, Rondeau E: Adult haemolytic and uraemic syndrome: causes and prognostic factors in the last decade. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:1228–1234.
  5. Elliott MA, Nichols WL: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:1154–1162.
  6. Hollenbeck M, Kutkuhn B, Aul C, Leschke M, Willers R, Grabensee B: Haemolytic-uraemic syndrome and thrombotic-thrombocytopenic purpura in adults: clinical findings and prognostic factors for death and end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:76–81.
  7. George JN: How I treat patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2000;96:1223–1229.
  8. Bell WR, Braine HG, Ness PM, Kickler TS: Improved survival in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clinical experience in 108 patients. N Engl J Med 1991;325:398–403.
  9. Hayward CP, Sutton DM, Carter WH Jr, Campbell ED, Scott JG, Francombe WH, Shumak KH, Baker MA: Treatment outcomes in patients with adult thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:982–987.
  10. Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, Blanchette VS, Kelton JG, Nair RC, Spasoff RA: Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Canadian Apheresis Study Group. N Engl J Med 1991;325:393–397.
  11. Dervenoulas J, Tsirigotis P, Bollas G, Pappa V, Xiros N, Economopoulos T, Pappa M, Mellou S, Kostourou A, Papageorgiou E, Raptis SA: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS): treatment outcome, relapses, prognostic factors. A single-center experience of 48 cases. Ann Hematol 2000;79:66–72.
  12. Elliott EJ, Robins-Browne RM, O’Loughlin EV, Bennett-Wood V, Bourke J, Henning P, Hogg GG, Knight J, Powell H, Redmond D: Nationwide study of haemolytic uraemic syndrome: clinical, microbiological, and epidemiological features. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:125–131.
  13. Hochberg MC: Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
  14. Lockshin MD: Update on antiphospholipid syndrome. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2006;64:57–59.

    External Resources

  15. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, PG DEG, Koike T, Meroni PL, Reber G, Shoenfeld Y, Tincani A, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Krilis SA: International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4:295–306.
  16. Allford SL, Hunt BJ, Rose P, Machin SJ: Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of the thrombotic microangiopathic haemolytic anaemias. Br J Haematol 2003;120:556–573.
  17. Besbas N, Karpman D, Landau D, et al: A classification of hemolytic uremic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related disorders. Kidney Int 2006;70:423–431.
  18. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31–41.
  19. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P: Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 2004;8:R204–R212.
  20. Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Lameire N: Defining acute renal failure: rifle and beyond. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;1:1314–1319.
  21. George JN, Kremer Hovinga JA, Terrell DR, Vesely SK, Lammle B: The Oklahoma thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome registry: the Swiss connection. Eur J Haematol 2008;80:277–286.
  22. Zimmerhackl LB, Scheiring J, Prufer F, Taylor CM, Loirat C: Renal transplantation in HUS patients with disorders of complement regulation. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:10–16.
  23. Siegler RL, Pavia AT, Hansen FL, Christofferson RD, Cook JB: Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a comparison with postdiarrheal disease. J Pediatr 1996;128:505–511.
  24. Gordjani N, Sutor AH, Zimmerhackl LB, Brandis M: Hemolytic uremic syndromes in childhood. Semin Thromb Hemost 1997;23:281–293.
  25. Bianchi V, Robles R, Alberio L, Furlan M, Lammle B: Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) in thrombocytopenic disorders: a severely deficient activity is specific for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2002;100:710–713.
  26. Mori Y, Wada H, Gabazza EC, Minami N, Nobori T, Shiku H, Yagi H, Ishizashi H, Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y: Predicting response to plasma exchange in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with measurement of VWF-cleaving protease activity. Transfusion 2002;42:572–580.
  27. Furlan M, Robles R, Galbusera M, Remuzzi G, Kyrle PA, Brenner B, Krause M, Scharrer I, Aumann V, Mittler U, Solenthaler M, Lammle B: Von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and the hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1578–1584.
  28. Veyradier A, Obert B, Houllier A, Meyer D, Girma JP: Specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease in thrombotic microangiopathies: a study of 111 cases. Blood 2001;98:1765–1772.
  29. Remuzzi G, Galbusera M, Noris M, Canciani MT, Daina E, Bresin E, Contaretti S, Caprioli J, Gamba S, Ruggenenti P, Perico N, Mannucci PM: Von Willebrand factor cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) is deficient in recurrent and familial thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome. Blood 2002;100:778–785.
  30. McMinn JR, George JN: Evaluation of women with clinically suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome during pregnancy. J Clin Apher 2001;16:202–209.
  31. George JN: The association of pregnancy with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura-hemolytic uremic syndrome. Curr Opin Hematol 2003;10:339–344.
  32. Espinosa G, Bucciarelli S, Cervera R, Lozano M, Reverter JC, de la Red G, Gil V, Ingelmo M, Font J, Asherson RA: Thrombotic microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and antiphospholipid antibodies. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:730–736.
  33. Bosch T, Wendler T: Extracorporeal plasma treatment in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome: a review. Ther Apher 2001;5:182–185.
  34. Ruggenenti P, Noris M, Remuzzi G: Thrombotic microangiopathy, hemolytic uremic syndrome, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Kidney Int 2001;60:831–846.
  35. Rock GA: Management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Br J Haematol 2000;109:496–507.
  36. Durand JM, Lefevre P, Kaplanski G, Telle H, Soubeyrand J: Vincristine for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet 1992;340:977–978.
  37. Lefevre P, Durand JM, Blanc AP, Guidon C, Peyron C, Alazia M, Prince-Zucchelli MA, Mongin M: Value of vincristine in the treatment of thrombotic thrombopenic purpura (in French). Presse Med 1986;15:77.
  38. Morel-Maroger L, Kanfer A, Solez K, Sraer JD, Richet G: Prognostic importance of vascular lesions in acute renal failure with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (hemolytic-uremic syndrome): clinicopathologic study in 20 adults. Kidney Int 1979;15:548–558.
  39. Descombes E, Droz D, Drouet L, Grunfeld JP, Lesavre P: Renal vascular lesions in lupus nephritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997;76:355–368.
  40. Hughson MD, Nadasdy T, McCarty GA, Sholer C, Min KW, Silva F: Renal thrombotic microangiopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and the antiphospholipid syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 1992;20:150–158.
  41. Pollock KG, Young D, Beattie TJ, Todd WT: Clinical surveillance of thrombotic microangiopathies in Scotland, 2003–2005. Epidemiol Infect 2008;136:115–121.
  42. Thompson CE, Damon LE, Ries CA, Linker CA: Thrombotic microangiopathies in the 1980s: clinical features, response to treatment, and the impact of the human immunodeficiency virus epidemic. Blood 1992;80:1890–1895.