Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 87, No. 4, 2009
Issue release date: August 2009
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009;87:249–255

Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesions for Phantom Limb Pain with Brachial Plexus Avulsion: A Study of Pain and Phantom Limb Sensation

Zheng Z. · Hu Y. · Tao W. · Zhang X. · Li Y.
Beijing Institute of Functional Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, PR China

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: Lesions in the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) have been shown to be significantly effective in relieving the pain of brachial plexus avulsion (BPA), but they have a limited effect on phantom limb pain (PLP). There is still the question remaining of whether DREZ lesions are effective in treating PLP in cases of BPA. Methods: Our study includes 14 post-traumatic patients with BPA and upper limb amputation. All developed PLP and underwent DREZ lesions. After the surgery, patients were asked to estimate the global percent of pain relief (0–100%). The phantom limb sensation (PLS) was also inquired after. Results: Overall, 9 (64.3%) of 14 patients had satisfactory pain relief; the mean follow-up was 15.2 ± 6.6 months. Among the 9 patients with satisfactory pain relief, PLS had altered in 6 (66.7%), while, in the other 5 patients with poor pain relief, none had experienced alterations in PLS. Conclusion: DREZ lesions are effective in the treatment of PLP with BPA. Alteration in PLS after the surgery may be a predictive factor for good pain relief. The good response of PLP patients with BPA to DREZ lesions suggests that an evaluation of the cervical dorsal roots should be conducted in patients with post-traumatic PLP.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Parry CB: Pain in avulsion of the brachial plexus. Neurosurgery 1984;15:960–965.
  2. Sindou MP, Blondet E, Emery E, Mertens P: Microsurgical lesioning in the dorsal root entry zone for pain due to brachial plexus avulsion: a prospective series of 55 patients. J Neurosurg 2005;102:1018–1028.
  3. Sindou MP, Merten P, Bendavid U, García-Larrea L, Mauguière F: Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potential for long lasting pain relief after spinal cord stimulation: practical use for patient selection. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1374–1384.
  4. Mertens P, Nuli C, Sindou MP, Guenot M, Peyron R, Garcia-Larrea L, Laurent B: Precentral cortex stimulation for the treatment of central neuropathic pain: results of a prospective study in a 20-patient series. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1999;73:122–125.
  5. Samii M, Bear-Henney S, Lüdemann W, Tatagiba M, Blömer U: Treatment of refractory pain after brachial plexus avulsion with dorsal root entry zone lesions. Neurosurgery 2001;6:1269–1275.

    External Resources

  6. Prestor B: Microsurgical junctional DREZ-coagulation for treatment of deafferentation pain syndromes. Surg Neurol 2001;56:259–265.
  7. Zhang XH, Li YJ, Hu YS, Tao W, Zheng Z: Dorsal root entry zone coagulation for treatment of deafferentation pain syndromes. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121:1089–1092.
  8. Guenot M, Bullier J, Rospars JP, Lansky P, Mertens P, Sindou MP: Single-unit analysis of the spinal dorsal horn in patients with neuropathic pain. J Clin Neurophysiol 2003;20:143–150.
  9. Sherman RA: Stump and phantom limb pain. Neurol Clin 1989;7:249–264.
  10. Melzack R: Phantom limbs. Sci Am 1992;266:120–126.
  11. Jensen TS, Krebs B, Nielsen J, Rasmussen P: Immediate and long-term phantom limb pain in amputees: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to pre-amputation pain. Pain 1985;21:268–278.

    External Resources

  12. Flor H: Phantom-limb pain: characteristics, causes, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2002;1:182–189.
  13. Saris SC, Iacono RP, Nashold BS: Successful treatment of phantom limb pain with dorsal root entry zone coagulation. Appl Neurophysiol 1988;51:188–197.
  14. Malin JP, Winkelmüller W: Phantom phenomena (phantom arm) following cervical root avulsion: effect of dorsal root entry zone thermocoagulation. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 1985;235:53–56.
  15. Doi K, Otsuka K, Okamoto Y, Fujii H, Hattori Y, Baliarsing AS: Cervical nerve root avulsion in brachial plexus injuries: magnetic resonance imaging classification and comparison with myelography and computerized tomography myelography. J Neurosurg 2002;96:277–284.
  16. Carvalho GA, Nikkhah G, Matthies C, Penkert G, Samii M: Diagnosis of root avulsions in traumatic brachial plexus injuries: value of computerized tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 1997;86:69–76.
  17. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W: The perception of phantom limbs: the D.O. Hebb lecture. Brain 1998;121:1603–1630.
  18. Le Chapelain L, Beis J-M, Paysant J, André J-M: Vestibular caloric stimulation evokes phantom limb illusions in patients with paraplegia. Spinal Cord 2001;39:85–87.
  19. Melzack R, Israel R, Lacroix R, Schultz G: Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain 1997;120:1603–1620.
  20. Hunter JP, Katz J, Davis KD: The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain 2003;126:579–589.
  21. Giummarra MJ, Gibson SJ, Georgiou-Karistianis, Bradshaw JL: Central mechanisms in phantom limb perception: the past, present and future. Brain Res Rev 2007;54:219–232.
  22. Katz J: Psychophysiological contributions to phantom limbs. Can J Psychiatry 1992;37:282–298.
  23. Flor H, Elbert T, Mühlnickel W, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Taub E: Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res 1998;119:205–212.
  24. Grüsser SM, Winter C, Mühlnickel W, Denke C, Karl A, Villringer K, Flor H: The relationship of perceptual phenomena and cortical reorganization in upper extremity amputees. Neuroscience 2001;102:263–272.
  25. Karl A, Birbaumer N, Lutzenberger W, Cohen LG, Flor H: Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. J Neurosci 2001;21:3609–3618.
  26. Melzack R: Phantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix. Trends Neurosci 1990;13:88–92.
  27. Wartan SW, Hamann W, Wedley JR, McColl I: Phantom pain and sensation among British veteran amputees. Br J Anaesh 1997;78:652–659.
  28. Ishijima B, Shimoji K, Shimizu H, Takahashi H, Suzuki I: Lesions of spinal and trigeminal dorsal root entry zone for deafferentation pain. Appl Neurophysiol 1988;51:175–187.
  29. Berman JS, Birch R, Anand P: Pain following human brachial plexus injury with spinal cord root avulsion and the effect of surgery. Pain 1998;75:199–207.
  30. Roux FE, Ibarrola D, Lazorthes Y, Berry I: Chronic motor cortex stimulation for phantom limb pain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Technical case report. Neurosurgery 2001;48:681–688.
  31. Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven CA: Analgesia through the looking-glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a ‘virtual’ limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. Eur J Pain 2007;11:428–436.
  32. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D: Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996;263:377–386.
  33. Oakley DA, Whitman LG, Halligan PW: Hypnotic imaginary as a treatment for phantom limb pain: two case reports and a review. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:368–377.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50