Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 42, No. 3, 2009
Issue release date: November 2009
Ophthalmic Res 2009;42:128–137

Extraction of a Chronically Implanted, Microfabricated, Subretinal Electrode Array

Chen J. · Shah H.A. · Herbert C. · Loewenstein J.I. · Rizzo, III J.F.
aDepartment of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, and bCenter for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Mass., USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Purpose: To assess the feasibility of extraction of a chronically implanted subretinal electrode array. Methods: Inactive, polyimide strips (10 mm × 1.5 mm × 15 μm) were surgically implanted into the subretinal space of 8 rabbits using a mostly ab externo approach. Pre- and postoperative clinical examinations, electroretinography and in some cases optical coherence tomography were performed to follow the course of the eyes. Two months after implantation, the polyimide strips were extracted from 5 eyes; 2 animals kept the implants and served as controls. All animals were then sacrificed and eyes enucleated for histological examination. Results: All 8 surgeries yielded successful placement of the arrays into the subretinal space. All 5 extraction surgeries were performed without obvious complications. Clinical examinations and electroretinography did not reveal any significant abnormalities. The histological examinations showed alterations from normal anatomy in all animals; the anatomical changes in the explanted animals were relatively mild and confined to the area of the surgery. Conclusions: Successful extraction of electrode arrays from the subretinal space of rabbits can be reliably performed 2 months after implantation, which is beyond the time period when postoperative scarring would be most intense.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Yanai D, Weiland JD, Mahadevappa M, Greenberg RJ, Fine I, Humayun MS: Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:820–827.
  2. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ: High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design. J Neurosci 2008;28:4446–4456.
  3. Gerding H, Benner FP, Taneri S: Experimental implantation of epiretinal retina implants (EPI-RET) with an IOL-type receiver unit. J Neural Eng 2007;4:S38–S49.
  4. Johnson L, Scribner D, Skeath P, Klein R, Ilg D, Perkins K, Helfgott M, Sanders R, Panigrahi D: Impedance-based retinal contact imaging as an aid for the placement of high resolution epiretinal prostheses. J Neural Eng 2007;4:S17–S23.
  5. Humayun M, Sato Y, Propst R, de Juan E Jr: Can potentials from the visual cortex be elicited electrically despite severe retinal degeneration and a markedly reduced electroretinogram? Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:57–64.
  6. Chow AY, Chow VY: Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina. Neurosci Lett 1997;225:13–16.
  7. Zrenner E, Stett A, Weiss S, Aramant RB, Guenther E, Kohler K, Miliczek KD, Seiler MJ, Haemmerle H, et al: Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors? Vision Res 1999;39:2555–2567.
  8. Rizzo JF 3rd, Wyatt J, Humayun M, de Juan E, Liu W, Chow A, Eckmiller R, Zrenner E, Yagi T, Abrams G, et al: Retinal prosthesis: an encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead. Ophthalmology 2001;108:13–14.
  9. Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Greenburg RJ, Marsh MJ, Klock IB, Milam AH: Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:511–515.
  10. Eckmiller R: Learning retina implants with epiretinal contacts. Ophthalmic Res 1997;29:281–289.
  11. Wyatt J, Rizzo J: Ocular implants for the blind. IEEE Spectr 1996;33:47–53.

    External Resources

  12. Loewenstein JI, Montezuma SR, Rizzo JF 3rd: Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:587–596.
  13. Margalit E, Maia M, Weiland JD, Greenberg RJ, Fujii GY, Torres G, Piyathaisere DV, O’Hearn TM, Liu W, Lazzi G, Dagnelie G, Scribner DA, de Juan E Jr, Humayun MS, et al: Retinal prosthesis for the blind. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:335–356.
  14. Zrenner E: Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 2002;295:1022–1025.
  15. Husain D, Loewenstein JI: Surgical approaches to retinal prosthesis implantation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2004;44:105–111.
  16. Schwahn HN, Gekeler F, Kohler K, Kobuch K, Sachs HG, Schulmeyer F, Jakob W, Gabel VP, Zrenner E: Studies on the feasibility of a subretinal visual prosthesis: data from Yucatan micropig and rabbit. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2001;239:961–967.
  17. Chow AY, Pardue MT, Chow VY, Peyman GA, Liang C, Perlman JI, Peachey NS, et al: Implantation of silicon chip microphotodiode arrays into the cat subretinal space. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2001;9:86–95.
  18. Chow AY, Pardue MT, Perlman JI, Ball SL, Chow VY, Hetling JR, Peyman GA, Liang C, Stubbs EB Jr, Peachey NS, et al: Subretinal implantation of semiconductor-based photodiodes: durability of novel implant designs. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39:313–321.
  19. Humayun M, Propst R, de Juan E Jr, McCormick K, Hickingbotham D, et al: Bipolar surface electrical stimulation of the vertebrate retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:110–116.
  20. Montezuma SR, Loewenstein J, Scholz C, Rizzo JF 3rd: Biocompatibility of materials implanted into the subretinal space of Yucatan pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:3514–3522.
  21. Sweitzer R, Scholz C, Montezuma SR, Rizzo JF 3rd: Evaluation of subretinal implants coated with amorphous aluminum oxide and diamond-like carbon. J Bioact Compat Polym 2006;21:5–22.
  22. Walter P, Szurman P, Vobig M, Berk H, Lüdtke-Handjery HC, Richter H, Mittermayer C, Heimann K, Sellhaus B, et al: Successful long-term implantation of electrically inactive epiretinal microelectrode arrays in rabbits. Retina 1999;19:546–552.
  23. Peyman G, Chow AY, Liang C, Chow VY, Perlman JI, Peachey NS, et al: Subretinal semiconductor microphotodiode array. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998;29:234–241.
  24. Majji AB, Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Suzuki S, D’Anna SA, de Juan E Jr, et al: Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:2073–2081.
  25. Hesse L, Schanze T, Wilms M, Eger M, et al: Implantation of retina stimulation electrodes and recording of electrical stimulation responses in the visual cortex of the cat. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;238:840–845.
  26. Güven D, Weiland JD, Fujii G, Mech BV, Mahadevappa M, Greenberg R, Roizenblatt R, Qiu G, Labree L, Wang X, Hinton D, Humayun MS, et al: Long-term stimulation by active epiretinal implants in normal and RCD1 dogs. J Neural Eng 2005;2:S65–S73.
  27. Chow AY, Chow VY, Packo KH, Pollack JS, Peyman GA, Schuchard R, et al: The artificial silicon retina microchip for the treatment of vision loss from retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:460–469.
  28. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Dagnelie G, Greenberg RJ, Propst RH, Phillips DH, et al: Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:40–46.
  29. Humayun MS, de Juan E Jr, Weiland JD, Dagnelie G, Katona S, Greenberg R, Suzuki S, et al: Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 1999;39:2569–2576.
  30. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J, Mech B, Cimmarusti V, Van Boemel G, Dagnelie G, de Juan E, et al: Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 2003;43:2573–2581.
  31. Rizzo JF 3rd, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D, et al: Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5362–5369.
  32. Rizzo JF 3rd, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D, et al: Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:5355–5361.
  33. Sellhaus B, Schanze T; EPI RET 3 Group: The EPI RET3 wireless intraocular retina implant system: biocompatibility of the EPI RET3 device (E-abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3009.
  34. Le Rouic JF, Bettembourg O, D’Hermies F, Azan F, Renard G, Chauvaud D: Late swelling and removal of Miragel buckles: a comparison with silicone indentations. Retina 2003;23:641–646.
  35. Kokame GT, Germar GG: Successful management of intruded hydrogel buckle with buckle removal, scleral patch graft, and vitrectomy. Retina 2003;23:536–538.
  36. Choi MY, Yu YS: Efficacy of removal of buckle after scleral buckling surgery for retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS 2000;4:362–365.
  37. Smiddy WE, Miller D, Flynn HW Jr: Scleral buckle removal following retinal reattachment surgery: clinical and microbiologic aspects. Ophthalmic Surg 1993;24:440–445.
  38. Owczarek FR, Marak GE, Pilkerton AR: Retinal adhesion in light- and dark-adapted rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1975;14:353–358.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50