Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 83, No. 2, 2009
Issue release date: September 2009
Urol Int 2009;83:211–216
(DOI:10.1159/000230026)

Inversion, Hydration and Diuresis during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Does It Improve the Stone-Free Rate for Lower Pole Stone Clearance?

Albanis S. · Ather H.M. · Papatsoris A.G. · Masood J. · Staios D. · Sheikh T. · Akhtar S. · Buchholz N.
aDepartment of Urology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London, UK; bDepartment of Urology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Objective: It was the aim of this study to assess the efficacy and safety of combined forced hydration and diuresis with limited inversion during shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) by comparing this treatment modality with conventional SWL for lower calyceal nephrolithiasis. Patients and Methods: In this prospective, non-randomized study, we included 100 patients with lower calyceal calculi ≤2 cm. Fifty of them received conventional SWL and the other 50 underwent SWL combined with oral hydration, diuresis and 12° inversion position during SWL. Intravenous urography was performed for all patients prior to their treatment. Patients in both groups were treated on Dornier™ MPL 9000. Blood pressure monitoring was applied during the SWL session. Follow-up was performed the first and the third month after treatment with plain kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray and kidney-ureter-bladder ultrasound. Results: Clinical outcomes were available in 90 patients. Follow-up at 3 months showed that 83.3% of the patients belonging to the study group were rendered stone free, whereas 71.5% were stone free in the control (p > 0.05). Complications were minimal and not statistically significant. Conclusions: Forced diuresis and inversion therapy is very well tolerated; however, the stone-free rate was not significantly improved.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhus AW, Woods JR: Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994;151:663–667.
  2. Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke P, Lingeman JE, et al: Lower pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 1998;12:113–119.
  3. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV: Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis – initial results. J Urol 2001;166:2072–2081.
  4. Ather MH, Abid F, Akhtar S, Khawaja K: Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy – the controversy continues. BMC Urol 2003;3:1–4.
  5. Danuser H, Müller R, Descoeudres B, Dobry E, Studer UE: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 2007;52:539–546.
  6. Sampaio FJ, Aragao AHM: Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 1994;8:241–247.
  7. May DJ, Chandhoke PS: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi. J Urol 1998;159:24–27.
  8. Pace KT, Tariq N, Dyer SJ, Weir MJ, D’A Honey RJ: Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2001;166:2065–2071.
  9. Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM, Liang S, Kamaraj R, Esuvaranathan K: Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2005;65:1070–1074.
  10. D’A Honey RJ, Luymes J, Weir MJ, Kodama R, Tariq N: Mechanical percussion inversion can result in relocation of lower pole stone fragments after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 2000;55:204–206.
  11. Tan YH, Wong M: How significant are clinically insignificant residual fragments following lithotripsy? Curr Opin Urol 2005;15:127–131.
  12. Talas H, Kilic O, Tangal S, Safak M: Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis? Urol Int 2007;79:129–132.
  13. Sorensen CM, Chandhoke PS, Paramjit S: Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones? J Urol 2002;168:2377–2382.
  14. Vella M, Caramia M, Maltese M, Melloni D, Caramia G: ESWL prediction of outcome and failure prevention. Urol Int 2007;79 (suppl 1):47–50.
  15. Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, et al: Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int 2007;79:124–128.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50