Aims:To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nonpenetrating filtering surgery in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma. Methods: Pertinent studies were selected by extensive searches. A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included in the present meta-analysis. The main outcome measures were risk differences (RDs) of complete success for efficacy and postoperative complications for tolerability. Pooled estimates were computed according to a random-effects model. Results:Viscocanalostomy and deep sclerectomy were significantly less effective than tra- beculectomy, and pooled RDs of complete success were –0.16 (95% confidence interval, CI, –0.30 to –0.02) and –0.10 (–0.19 to 0.00). Deep sclerectomy plus mitomycin C (MMC) was also less effective than trabeculectomy plus MMC, with pooled RD of complete success being –0.16 (95% CI –0.32 to –0.01). Viscocanalostomy and deep sclerectomy caused main complications in fewer patients than trabeculectomy. Conclusions:Viscocanalostomy and deep sclerectomy were less effective than trabeculectomy in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, and deep sclerectomy plus MMC was also less effective than trabeculectomy plus MMC. However, viscocanalostomy and deep sclerectomy were associated with fewer complications than trabeculectomy.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: 9/9/2009
Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 5
ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)
For additional information: http://www.karger.com/OPH
Copyright / Drug Dosage
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.