Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 151, No. 4, 2010
Issue release date: March 2010
Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010;151:343–345
(DOI:10.1159/000250443)

The Longest Wheal Diameter Is the Optimal Measurement for the Evaluation of Skin Prick Tests

Konstantinou G.N. · Bousquet P.-J. · Zuberbier T. · Papadopoulos N.G.
aDepartment of Allergy and Allergy Research Center, Pediatric Hospital “P&A Kiriakou”, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, member of the GA2LEN network, and bDepartment of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 417 NIMTS Army Hospital, Athens, Greece; cExploration des Allergies, Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France; dDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, member of the GA2LEN network, Berlin, Germany

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Background: Mean diameter or longest diameter are the 2 most frequently used parameters for wheal response assessment after skin prick testing (SPT). We aimed to compare these 2 parameters taking as gold standard the surface of the wheal skin response. Patients and Methods: Patients suspected of having an allergic reaction against inhalant allergens have been skin prick tested using the Pan-European GA2LEN SPT panel. Fifteen minutes later, macroscopically evident wheal and flare reactions were marked with a pen and transferred to paper with a transparent scotch tape. Each paper-transferred wheal was scanned with an ordinary scanner, and its surface-corresponding maximum perpendicular diameters and longest diameters were measured using a computer software application for image recognition, developed for this purpose. Correlation coefficients (Spearman’s ρ) between surfaces and respective mean (ρmean) or longest (ρlongest) diameters were calculated and subsequently compared. Results: 1,554 SPTs were performed in 74 patients. In 264, a macroscopically evident wheal and flare response was observed. Both mean and longest diameters correlated significantly with the wheal surfaces. However, ρlongest was statistically significantly larger than ρmean when the surface of the wheal was >17 mm2longest > 0.860 vs. ρmean < 0.660; p < 0.05).Such a surface corresponds to a maximum diameter of approximately 7 mm and a mean diameter of approximately 6 mm. Thus, the larger the surface of the wheal, the more appropriate the usage of the longest diameter. Conclusions: The longest wheal diameter alone seems to be a better surrogate marker of the wheal surface in comparison with the mean diameter. In addition, it is easier and faster to measure. Therefore, we propose this as the optimal methodology to evaluate SPTs.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Bernstein IL, Li JT, Bernstein DI, Hamilton R, Spector SL, Tan R, Sicherer S, Golden DB, Khan DA, Nicklas RA, Portnoy JM, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Lang DM, Oppenheimer J, Randolph CC, Schuller DE, Tilles SA, Wallace DV, Levetin E, Weber R: Allergy diagnostic testing: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008;100:S1–S148.
  2. Heinzerling L, Frew AJ, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bonini S, Bousquet J, Bresciani M, Carlsen KH, van Cauwenberge P, Darsow U, Fokkens WJ, Haahtela T, van Hoecke H, Jessberger B, Kowalski ML, Kopp T, Lahoz CN, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Papadopoulos NG, Ring J, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Vignola AM, Wohrl S, Zuberbier T: Standard skin prick testing and sensitization to inhalant allergens across Europe – a survey from the GA2LEN network. Allergy 2005;60:1287–1300.
  3. Anonymous: Skin tests used in type I allergy testing position paper. Sub-committee on skin tests of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 1989;44(suppl 10):1–59.

    External Resources

  4. Wöhrl S, Vigl K, Binder M, Stingl G, Prinz M: Automated measurement of skin prick tests: an advance towards exact calculation of wheal size. Exp Dermatol 2006;15:119–124.
  5. Lin RY, Erlich ER, Don PC: Skin prick test responses to codeine, histamine, and ragweed utilizing the multitest device. Ann Allergy 1990;65:222–226.
  6. Dreborg S: Skin testing in allergen standardization and research. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2001;21:329–354.

    External Resources



Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 33.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 23.00