Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 36, No. 2, 1999
Issue release date: March–April 1999

Evaluation of Absolute Cerebral Blood Flow by Laser-Doppler Scanning – Comparison with Hydrogen Clearance

Uranishi R. · Nakase H. · Sakaki T. · Kempski O.S.
To view the fulltext, log in and/or choose pay-per-view option

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

A major limitation of laser-Doppler (LD) flowmetry, which enables noninvasive and continuous recording of tissue perfusion, is its inability to evaluate the absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF). Using a computer-controlled micromanipulator, the LD scanning technique provides information on the brain microcirculation in many different locations, information which is not available from a single stationary probe. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether LD scanning estimates can be calibrated for the absolute CBF by comparing LD scanning with the hydrogen clearance (HC) method. In Wistar rats (n = 31) including old rats (122–123 weeks old, n = 8), the CBF was altered using the global ischemia model by bilateral carotid artery occlusion coupled with hypobaric hypotension. The CBF was determined simultaneously by the LD scanning technique and HC at each mean arterial blood pressure step, and the correlation of CBF between the two techniques was analyzed. CBF measured by LD scanning was expressed as LD units. Absolute CBF values obtained by methods were correlated (r = 0.87), and the formula to calibrate absolute CBF values from LD units was y = 1.8x – 0.6. On the other hand, in old rats the formula to calibrate the absolute values was different (y = 1.3x + 8.3, r = 0.85). The results suggest that CBF data obtained by LD scanning could be calibrated into absolute blood flow values in particular circumstances, and that LD scanning could compensate in part for the weakness of LD flowmetry.



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Haberl RL, Villringer A, Dirnagel U: Applicability of laser-Doppler flowmetry for cerebral blood flow monitoring in neurological intensive care. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1993;59:64–68.
  2. Kramer MS, Vinall PE, Katolik LI, Simeone FA: Comparison of cerebral blood flow measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry and hydrogen clearance in cats after cerebral insult and hypervolemic hemodilution. Neurosurgery 1996;38:355–361.
  3. Skarphedinsson JO, Harding H, Thoren P: Repeated measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats. Comparisons between the hydrogen clearance method and laser Doppler flowmetry. Acta Physiol Scand 1988;134:133–142.
  4. Lindsberg PJ, O’Neill JT, Paakkari IA; Hallenbeck JM, Feurstein G: Validation of laser-Doppler flowmetry in measurement of spinal cord blood flow. Am J Physiol 1989;257:674–680.
  5. Dirnagl U, Kaplan B, Jacewicz M, Pulsinelli W: Continuous measurement of cerebral blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry in a rat stroke model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1989;9:589–596.
  6. Heimann A, Kroppenstedt S, Ulrich P, Kempski OS: Cerebral blood flow autoregulation during hypobaric hypotension assessed by laser Doppler scanning. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1994;14:1100–1105.
  7. Ungersbock K, Heimann A, Strecker U, Kempski O: Mapping of cortical blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry; in Tomita M, Mchedlishvili G, Rosenblum WI, Heiss W-O, Fukuuchi Y (eds): Microcirculatory Stasis in the Brain. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1993, pp 405–413.
  8. Nakase H, Heimann A, Kempski O: Cerebral blood flow in a rat cortical vein occlusion model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:720–728.
  9. Nakase H, Heimann A, Kempski O: Alterations of regional cerebral blood flow and tissue oxygen saturation in a rat sinus-vein thrombosis model. Stroke 1996;27:720–727.
  10. Nakase H, Kempski O, Heimann A, Takeshima T, Tintera J: Microcirculation after cerebral venous occlusion assessed by laser Doppler scanning. J Neurosurg 1997;87:307–314.
  11. Casadevall M, Pnes J, Pique JM, Bosch J, Teres J, Rodes J: Limitations of laser-Doppler and reflectance spectrophotometry in estimating gastric mucosal blood flow. Am J Physiol 1992;263:810–815.
  12. Diresta GR, Kiel JW, Riedel GL, Kaplan P, Shephead AP: Hybrid blood flow probe for simultaneous H2 clearance and laser-Doppler velocimetry. Am J Physiol 1987;253:573–581.
  13. Haberl RL, Heizer ML, Ellis EF: Laser-Doppler assessment of brain microcirculation: Effect of local alterations. Am J Physiol 1989;256:1255–1260.
  14. Talman WT, Dragon DMN, Heistad DD, Ohta H: Cerebrovascular effects produced by electrical stimulation of fastigial nucleus. Am J Physiol 1991;261:707–713.
  15. Fabricius M, Lauritzen M: Laser-Doppler evaluation of rat microcirculation: Comparison with the [14C]-iodoantipyrine method suggests discordance during cerebral blood flow increases. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:156–161.

    External Resources

  16. Rundquist I, Smith QR, Michel ME, Ask P, Oberg PA, Rapoport SI: Sciatic nerve blood flow measured by laser Doppler flowmetry and [14C] iodoantipyrine. Am J Physiol 1985;248:311–317.
  17. Arbit E, DiResta GR, Bedford RF, Shah NK, Galicich JH: Intraoperative measurement of cerebral and tumor blood flow with laser-Doppler flowmetry. Neurosurgery 1989;24:166–170.

    External Resources

  18. Kempski O, Heimann A, Strecker U: On the number of measurements necessary to assess regional cerebral blood flow by local laser Doppler recordings: A simulation study with data from 45 rabbits. Int J Microcirc 1995;15:37–42.


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50