Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 29, No. 2, 2010
Issue release date: April 2010
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2010;29:115–122

Predicting Gains in Dementia Caregiving

Liew T.M. · Luo N. · Ng W.Y. · Chionh H.L. · Goh J. · Yap P.
aDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, bGeriatric Centre, cDepartment of Medical Social Service, Alexandra Hospital, dDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, eCentre for Health Services Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: Caregiver gain is an important yet less-explored phenomenon. Being conceptually distinct from burden, factors associated with burden and gain can differ. This study aims to explore factors associated with the experience of gains in dementia caregiving. Method: Cross-sectional study involving caregivers recruited from a tertiary hospital dementia clinic and the local Alzheimer’s Association. Caregivers completed a questionnaire containing the following scales: gain in Alzheimer’s care Instrument (GAIN), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Dementia Management Strategies Scale (DMSS), Revised Memory and Behavioral Problems Checklist (RMBPC) and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Demographic information for the person with dementia (PWD) and the caregiver was also recorded. Initial screening with univariate analyses (t tests, ANOVAs, Pearson’s correlations) was performed to identify significant (p < 0.05) variables, which were then entered into a multiple regression model to identify variables associated with gain. Result: The final sample comprised 334 caregivers with a mean age of 51.5 years (SD = 10.9, range = 22–85), the majority of whom where Chinese (94.6%) females (71%). Mean GAIN score was 30 (SD = 6.6, range = 7–40). Regression analysis identified 3 factors significantly associated with gains (adjusted R2 32.3%): mental well-being of the caregiver, use of active management as a caregiving strategy, and participation in caregiver educational and support group programmes. Conclusion: The results have important implications for caregiver interventions. Interventions should target maintaining mental well-being, encouraging participation in educational and support programmes, and teaching appropriate coping and dementia specific management strategies to derive good outcomes.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, et al: Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet 2005;17;366:2112–2117.
  2. Chiam PC, Ng TP, Tan LL, Ong PS, Ang A, Kua EH: Prevalence of dementia in Singapore – results of the national mental health survey of the elderly 2003. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004;33:14–15.
  3. Berr C, Wancata J, Ritchie K: Prevalence of dementia in the elderly in Europe. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005;15:463–471.
  4. Vitaliano PP, Zhang J, Scanlan JM: Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2003;130:946–972.

    External Resources

  5. Pinquart M, Sorensen S: Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 2003;18:250–267.
  6. Edel M: Alzheimer’s disease: the psychological and physical effects of the caregiver’s role. Gerontol Care Pract 2008;20:33–38.
  7. Stone R, Cafferata GL, Sangl J: Caregivers of the frail elderly: a national profile. Gerontologist 1987;27:616–626.
  8. Gaugler JE, Kane RL, Kane RA, Clay T, Newcomer R: Caregiving and institutionalization of cognitively impaired older people: utilizing dynamic predictors of change. Gerontologist 2003;43:219–229.
  9. Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R: Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA 2002;287:2090–2097.
  10. Etters L, Goodall D, Harrison BE: Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008;20:423–428.
  11. Folkman S: Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1207–1221.
  12. Hilgeman MM, Allen RS, DeCoster J, Burgio LD: Positive aspects of caregiving as a moderator of treatment outcome over 12 months. Psychol Aging 2007;22:361–371.
  13. Lawton MP, Kleban KH, Moss M, Rovine M, Glicksman A: Measuring caregiving appraisal. J Gerontol 1989;44:61–71.
  14. Netto NR, Goh YNJ, Yap LKP: Growing and gaining through caring for a loved one with dementia. Dementia 2009;8:245–261.

    External Resources

  15. Sanders S: Is the glass half empty or full? Reflections on strain and gain in caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Soc Work Health Care 2005;40:57–73.
  16. López J, López-Arrieta J, Crespoa M: Factors associated with the positive impact of caring for elderly and dependent relatives. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2005;41:81–94.
  17. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 3. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
  18. Yap LKP, Luo N, Ng WY, Chionh HL, Lim J, Goh J: Gain in Alzheimer’s care instrument (GAIN) – a new scale to measure caregiving gains in dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010;18:68–76.
  19. Teri L, Truax P, Logsdon R, Uomoto J, Zarit S, Vitaliano PP: Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist. Psychol Aging 1992;7:622–631.
  20. Hinrichsen GA, Niederehe G: Dementia management strategies and adjustment of family members of older patients. Gerontologist 1994;34:95–102.
  21. Fones CS, Kua EH, Ng TP, Ko SM: Studying the mental health of a nation: a preliminary report on a population survey in Singapore. Singapore Med J 1998;39:251–255.
  22. Zarit SH, Reever KE, Peterson JB: Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980;20:649–655.
  23. Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Felling AJ, Brummelkamp E, Dauzenberg MG, van den Bos GA, Grol R: Assessment of caregiver’s competence in dealing with the burden of caregiving for a dementia patient: a Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ) suitable for clinical practice. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:256–257.
  24. Andren S, Elmstahl S: Family caregivers’ subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scand J Caring Sci 2005;19:157–168.
  25. Kahana E, Young R: Clarifying the caregiving paradigm: challenges for future; in Biegel DE, Blum A (eds): Ageing and Caregiving: Theory, Research and Policy. Newbury Park, Sage, 1990.
  26. Hadjistavropoulos T, Taylor S, Tuokko H, Beattie BL: Neuropsychological deficits, caregivers’ perception of deficits and caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:308–314.
  27. Kinney JM, Stephens MA: Hassles and uplifts of giving care to a family member with dementia. Psychol Aging 1989;4:402–408.
  28. Gaugler JE, Kane RL, Kane RA, Clay T, Newcomer RC: The effects of duration of caregiving on institutionalization. Gerontologist 2005;45:78–79.
  29. Vugt ME, Stevens F, Aalten P, et al: Do caregiver management strategies influence patient behaviour in dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;19:85–92.
  30. Brodaty H, McGilchrist C, Harris L, Peters KE: Time until institutionalization and death in patients with dementia: role of caregiver training and risk factors. Arch Neurol 1993;50:643–650.
  31. Gitlin LN, Belle SH, Burgio LD, Czaja SJ, Mahoney D, Gallagher-Thompson D: Effect of multicomponent interventions on caregiver burden and depression: the REACH multisite initiative at 6-month follow-up. Psychol Aging 2003;18:361–374.
  32. Mittelman MS, Haley WE, Clay OJ, Roth DL: Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2006;67:1592–1599.
  33. Pinquart M, Sorensen S: Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects? Int Psychogeriatr 2006;18:577–595.
  34. Brodaty H, Green A, Koschera A: Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:657–664.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50