Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 43, No. 2, 2010
Issue release date: February 2010
Psychopathology 2010;43:121–126

The Relationship between Excessive Internet Use and Depression: A Questionnaire-Based Study of 1,319 Young People and Adults

Morrison C.M. · Gore H.
Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in


Background: There is a growing awareness of a psychiatric construct that needs to be better defined and understood: Internet addiction (IA). Recently there has been much public concern over the relationship between Internet use and negative affect. This study explored the concept of IA and examined the relationship between addictive symptoms and depression. Sampling and Methods: An online questionnaire was used to measure participants’ Internet use, the functions for which they used the Internet, and their depressive tendencies. Three scales were included: the IA Test, the Internet Function Questionnaire and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). 1,319 respondents completed the questionnaires, with 18 (1.2%) identified as falling in the IA category. Results: Correlational analyses were conducted across the whole data sample. In factorial analyses, the 18 IA respondents were compared to a matched group of non-addicted (NA) respondents in terms of their scores on the Function Test and the BDI. Across the whole data sample, there was a close relationship between IA tendencies and depression, such that IA respondents were more depressed; there were also significant differences between the sexes, with men showing more addictive tendencies than women. In addition, young people were significantly more likely to show addictive symptoms than were older people. There was a significant difference between the IA and the NA group in their levels of depressive symptoms, with the NA group firmly in the non-depressed range, and the IA group in the moderately-to-severely depressed range (F1, 34 = 22.35; p < 0.001). In terms of the function for which they used the Internet, the IA group engaged significantly more than the NA group in sexually gratifying websites, gaming websites and online community/chat websites. Conclusions: The concept of IA is emerging as a construct that must be taken seriously. Moreover, it is linked to depression, such that those who regard themselves as dependent on the Internet report high levels of depressive symptoms. Those who show symptoms of IA are likely to engage proportionately more than the normal population in sites that serve as a replacement for real-life socialising. Further work needs to be done on validating this relationship. Future research is needed to corroborate the existing evidence and address the nature of the relationship between IA and depression: there is comorbidity between these conditions that needs greater investigation.

Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.


  1. Murali V, George S: Lost online: an overview of Internet addiction. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2007;13:24–30.

    External Resources

  2. Shapira N, Lessig M, Goldsmith T, Szabo S, Lazoritz M, Gold M, et al: Problematic Internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety 2003;17:207–216.
  3. Block JJ: Issues for DSM-V: Internet addiction. Am J Psychiatry 2008;165:306–307.
  4. Block JJ: Pathological computer use in the USA. International Symposium on the Counseling and Treatment of Youth Internet Addiction. Seoul, National Youth Commission, 2007, p 433.
  5. Wang AY: Migration to next-generation mobile broadband services in Asia and worldwide. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Mobility World Congress, Beijing, November 2008.
  6. Griffiths M: Internet addiction: does it really exist?; in Gackenbach J (ed): Psychology and the Internet. San Diego, Academic Press, 1998, pp 61–75.
  7. O’Reilly M: Internet addiction: a new disorder enters the medical lexicon. CMAJ 1996;154:1882–1883.
  8. Shotton M: The costs and benefits of computer addiction. Behav Inf Technol 1991;10:219–230.

    External Resources

  9. Young KS: Caught in the Net: How to Recognize Internet Addiction and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York, Wiley & Sons, 1998.
  10. Young KS: Evaluation and treatment of Internet addiction; in VandeCreek L, Jackson T (eds): Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book. Sarasota, Professional Resource Press, 1999, vol 17, pp 19–31.
  11. Beard KW: Internet addiction: a review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:7–14.
  12. Pavia W: Bridgend, suicide and the Internet: the facts. Times Online, Feb 19, 2008. article3399528.ece (accessed March 19, 2008).
  13. Rajagopal S: Suicide pacts and the Internet. BMJ 2004;329:1298–1299.
  14. Young KS, Rogers RC: The relationship between depression and Internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998;1:25–28.

    External Resources

  15. Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M, et al: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961;4:561–571.
  16. The British Gambling Commission: The British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. (accessed July 7, 2009).
  17. Ha JH, Kim SY, Bae SC, et al: Depression and Internet addiction in adolescents. Psychopathology 2007;40:424–430.
  18. Davis RA: A cognitive-behavioural model of pathological Internet use. Comput Human Behav 2001;17:187–195.

    External Resources

  19. Caplan SE: Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument. Comput Human Behav 2002;18:5553–5575.

    External Resources

  20. Byun S, Ruffini C, Mills J, Douglas A, Niang M, Stepchenkova S, Lee S, Loutfi J, Lee JK, Atallah M, Blanton M: Internet addiction: metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:203–207.

Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50