Journal Mobile Options
Table of Contents
Vol. 58, No. 1-2, 2001
Issue release date: January–June 2001
Phonetica 2001;58:81–102
(DOI:10.1159/000028489)

Acoustic Vowel Reduction in Creek: Effects of Distinctive Length and Position in the Word

Johnson K. · Martin J.
aOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; bCollege of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Va., USA

Individual Users: Register with Karger Login Information

Please create your User ID & Password





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.

To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Abstract

Eight speakers (4 male and 4 female) of the Muskogee dialect of Creek pronounced a set of words illustrating the vowels and diphthongs of Creek. These recordings were analyzed acoustically and data on vowel duration and vowel formant frequencies are presented in this paper. The ratio of the durations of dictinctively long and short vowels was 1.8. This ratio showed a sex difference, being larger for female speakers than it was for male speakers. Final lengthening was also observed: both distinctively long and short vowels were longer in word-final position than in word-initial position. The vowel formant data showed two additive, orthogonal phonetic vowel reduction processes: short vowel centralization and positional reduction. Short vowel centralization has been found in many languages. Distinctively long vowels in Creek tended to be more peripheral in the acoustic vowel space than were the distinctively short vowels. Positional reduction is also evident in these data: vowels in word-final position were reduced relative to vowels in word-initial position. Short vowel centralization was preserved in both positions in the word. Positional reduction has been documented in several languages, and these results from Creek lend support to the hypothesis that it is a general property of speech production. The results of this acoustic-phonetic study, the first such study of Creek, are discussed in light of cross-linguistic phonetic trends.

Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel



Copyright / Drug Dosage

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in goverment regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

References

  1. Abramson, A.S.; Ren, N.: Distinctive vowel length: duration vs. spectrum in Thai. J. Phonet. 18: 79–92 (1990).
  2. Aoki, C.; Klatt, D.H.; Kawasaki, H.: Acoustic-phonetic analysis of Japanese. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 75: S60 (1984).
  3. Beckman, J.N.: Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14: 1–46 (1997).
  4. Beckman, M.; Edwards, J.; Fletcher, J.: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics; in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment and prosody, pp. 68–89 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).
  5. Behne, D.; Moxness, B.; Nyland, A.: Acoustic-phonetic evidence of vowel quantity and quality in Norwegian. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2, pp. 13–16 (1996).
  6. Berkovits, R.: Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress. Lang. Speech 37: 237–250 (1994).
  7. Bladon, R.A.W.; Henton, C.G.; Pickering, J.B.: Towards and auditory theory of speaker normalization. Lang. Commun. 4: 59–69 (1984).
  8. Buckley, E.: Iambic lengthening and final vowels. Int. J. Am. Ling. 64: 179–223 (1998).
  9. Byrd, D.: Sex, dialects, and reduction. Proc. ICSLP 92: 1992 Int. Conf. on Spoken Lang. Processing, vol. 1, pp. 827–830.
  10. Byrd, D.: Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. J. Phonet. 24: 209–244 (1996).
  11. Carlson, R.; Friberg, A.; Frydén, L.; Granström, B.; Sundberg, J.: Speech and music performance: parallels and contrasts. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 7–23 (1987).
  12. Cho, T.; Taff, A.; Dirks, M.; Ladefoged, P.: Some phonetic structures of Aleut. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 95: 68–90 (1997).
  13. Choi, J.D.; Keating, P.: Vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in three Slavic languages. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 78: 78–86 (1991).
  14. Cooper, W.E.: Syntactic control of speech timing; PhD diss. Psychology, MIT (1976).
  15. Dankovičcová, J.: The domain of articulation rate variation in Czech. J. Phonet. 25: 287–312 (1997).
  16. D’Imperio, M.; GiliFavela, B.: Laboratory phonology paper (1998).De Jong, K.; McDonough, J.: Tone and tonogenesis in Navajo. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 84: 165–182 (1993).
  17. Delattre, P.: A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. Int. Rev. appl. Ling. 4: 183–198 (1966).
  18. Edwards, J.; Beckman, M.E.; Fletcher, J.: The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 89: 369–382 (1991).
  19. Eek, A.; Remmel, M.: Context, contacts and duration: two results concerning temporal organization. Preprints Speech Commun. Semin., pp. 187–192, 1974.
  20. Fant, G.: A note on vocal tract size factors and nonuniform F-pattern scalings; in Fant, Speech sounds and features (MIT Press, Cambridge 1973).
  21. Fischer-Jørgensen, E.: Formant frequencies of long and short Danish vowels; in Firchow et al., Studies for Einar Haugen, pp. 189–213 (Mouton, The Hague 1972).
  22. Fletcher, J.: Rhythm and final lengthening in French. J. Phonet. 19: 193–212 (1991).
  23. Fletcher, J.; Vatikiotis-Bateson, E.: Articulation of prosodic contrasts in French. Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 18–21, 1991.Fónagy, I.; Magdics, K.: Speech of utterance in phrases of different lengths. Lang. Speech 3: 179–192 (1960).
  24. Fougeron, C.; Keating, P.A.: Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 101: 3728–3740 (1997).
  25. Garnes, S.: Phonetic evidence supporting a phonological analysis. J. Phonet. 1: 273–283 (1973).
  26. Gordon, M.: The phonetic structures of Hupa. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 93: 164–187 (1996).
  27. Gordon, M.; Maddieson, I.: The phonetics of Ndumbea. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 91: 25–44 (1995).
  28. Gordon, M.; Munro, P.; Ladefoged, P.: The phonetic structures of Chickasaw. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 95: 41–67 (1997).
  29. Haas, M.R.: Ablaut and its function in Muskogee. Language 16: 141–150 (1940).
  30. Haas, M.: Tonal accent in Creek; in Hyman, Studies in stress and accent, vol. 4. SCOPIL (University of Southern California, Los Angeles 1977a).
  31. Haas, M.R.: Nasals and nasalization in Creek; in Whistler et al., Proc. 3rd Annu. Meet. Berkeley Ling. Soc., pp. 194–203 (Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley 1977b).
  32. Hallé, P.; Boysson-Bardies, B. de; Vihman, M.M.: Beginnings of prosodic organization: intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Lang. Speech 34: 299–318 (1991).
  33. Herman, R.; Beckman, M.; Honda, K.: Subglottal pressure and final lowering in English. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Spoken Lang. Processing, pp. 145–148, 1997.Ho, A.T.: The acoustic variation of Mandarin tones. Phonetica 33: 353–367 (1976).
  34. Hofhuis, E.; Gussenhoven, C.; Rietveld, A.: Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch. Proc. Congr. Phonet. Sci., vol. 1, pp. 154–157, 1995.
  35. Hume, E.V.: Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in nonlinear phonology (Garland, New York 1994).
  36. Hunnicut, S.: Intelligibility versus redundancy: conditions of dependency. Lang. Speech 28: 45–56 (1985).
  37. Hutchinson, S.: An objective index of the English-Spanish pronunciation dimension; Master’s thesis University of Texas, Austin (1973).
  38. Iivonen, A.: On the relationship between the main components in the control of speech. Preprints Speech Commun. Semin., pp. 163–172, 1974.
  39. Jones, D.: Chronemes and tonemes. Acta ling. 3: 1–10 (1942/43).
  40. Jun, S.: The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody; PhD diss. Ohio State University (1993).
  41. Kaiki, N.; Takeda, K.; Sagisaka, Y.: Statistical analysis for segmental duration rules in Japanese speech synthesis; in Proc. 1990 Int. Conf. on Spoken Lang. Processing, vol. 1, pp. 17–20 (1990).
  42. Keating, P.A.; Huffman, M.K.: Vowel variation in Japanese. Phonetica 41: 191–207 (1984).
  43. Klatt, D.H.: Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 59: 1208–1221 (1976).
  44. Krakow, R.A.: Nonsegmental influences on velum movement patterns: syllables, sentences, stress, and speaking rate; in Huffman, Krakow, Nasals, nasalization, and the velum. Phonetics and Phonology V, pp. 87–118 (Academic Press, New York 1993).
  45. Krakow, R.A.; Bell-Berti, F.; Wang, Q.E.: Supralaryngeal declination: evidence from the velum; in Bell-Berti, Raphael, Producing speech: contemporary issues for Katherine Safford Harris, pp. 333–353 (American Institute of Physics Press, New York 1995).
  46. Ladefoged, P.; Ladefoged, J.; Turk, A.; Hind, K.; Skilton, St.J.: Phonetic structures of Gaelic. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 95: 114–153 (1997).
  47. Lee, T.: The vowel system in two varieties of Cantonese. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 57: 97–114 (1983).
  48. Lehiste, I.: Suprasegmentals (MIT Press, Cambridge 1970).
  49. Lehiste, I.: The timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 51: 2018–2024 (1972).
  50. Lehiste, I.; Ivić, P.: Word and sentence prosody in Serbo-Croatian (MIT Press, Cambridge 1986).
  51. Lehtonen, J.: Aspects of quantity in Standard Finnish. Stud. philol. Jyväskyläensia 6: (1970).
  52. Lieberman, P.: Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Lang. Speech 6: 172–187 (1963).
  53. Lindau-Webb, M.: Hausa vowels and diphthongs. Stud. Afr. Ling. 16: 161–182 (1985).
  54. Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963).
  55. Lindblom, B.: On the production and recognition of vowels; summary of doct. thesis, University of Lund (1968).Lindblom, B.: Economy of speech gestures; In MacNeilage, The production of speech (Springer, New York 1983).
  56. Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 403–439 (Kluwer Academic, Norwell 1990).
  57. Lindblom, B.; Lyberg, B.; Holmgren, K.: Durational patterns of Swedish phonology: do they reflect short-term motor memory processes? (Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington 1981).
  58. McDonough, J.; Austin-Garrison, M.: Vowel enhancement and dispersion in the vowel space of Western Navajo: a study of traditional Navajo speakers. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 87: 93–104 (1994)
  59. .McDonough, J.; Ladefoged, P.; George, H.: Navajo vowels and phonetic universal tendencies. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 84: 143–150 (1993).
  60. Maddieson, I.; Anderson, V.B.: Some phonetic characteristics of Iaai. Proc. Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 540–543 (1994).
  61. Maddieson, I.; Spajic, S.; Sands, B.; Ladefoged, P.: Phonetic structures of Dahalo. Afrikanist. Arbeitspapiere 36: 5–53 (1993).
  62. Malmberg, B.: Die Quantität als phonetisch-phonologischer Begriff. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift N.F., Part 1, 41–42 (1944).
  63. Manuel, S.Y.: The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 88: 1286–1298 (1990).
  64. Manuel, S.Y.; Krakow, R.A.: Universal and language particular aspects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation. Haskins Lab. Status Rep. Speech Res., SR-77/78, pp. 69–78 (Haskins Laboratories, New Haven 1984).
  65. Marslen-Wilson, W.; Tyler, L.: The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8: 1–71 (1980).
  66. Millenkovic, P.; Read, C.: CSpeech version 4 user’s manual (Madison 1992).
  67. Nakatani, L.H.; O’Connor, K.D.; Aston, C.H.: Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm. Phonetica 38: 84–106 (1981).
  68. Nickerson, R.S.; Stevens, K.N.; Boothroyd, A.; Rollins, A: Some observations on timing in the speech of deaf and hearing speakers. Report No. 2905 (Bolt, Beranek & Newman, Cambridge 1974).
  69. Nooteboom, S.: Production and perception of vowel duration: a study of durational properties of vowels in Dutch; PhD diss. University of Utrecht (1972).
  70. Nord, L.: Acoustic studies of vowel reduction in Swedish. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 19–36 (1986).
  71. Norlin, K.: Acoustic analysis of vowels and diphthongs in Cairo Arabic. Lund Univ., Dep. Ling. Working Papers 27: 185–208 (1984).
  72. Öhman, S.: Coarticulation in VCV utterances: spectrographic measurements. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 30: 149–154 (1966).
  73. Peterson, G.E.; Barney, H.L.: Control methods used in a study of vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 24: 175–184 (1952).
  74. Pierrehumbert, J.; Talkin, D.: Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop; in Docherty, Ladd, Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody pp. 90–127 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992).
  75. Pullum, G.K.; Ladusaw, W.A.: Phonetic symbol guide (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1986).
  76. Roudet, L.: Eléments de Phonétique Générale (Library Universitaire, Paris 1910).
  77. Shalev, M.; Ladefoged, P.; Bhaskararao, P.: Phonetics of Toda. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 84: 89–126 (1993).
  78. Shen, S.: A pilot study on the relation between temporal and syntactic structures in Mandarin. JIPA 22: 35–43 (1992).
  79. Shipman, D.W.; Zue, V.W.: Properties of large lexicons: implications for advanced isolated word recognition systems. ICASSP 82: 546–549 (1982).
  80. Shryock, A.; Ladefoged, P.; Williamson, K.: Phonetic structures of Defaka. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 91: 89–109 (1995).
  81. Steriade, D.: Underspecification and markedness; in Goldsmith, The handbook of phonological theory, pp. 114–174 (Blackwell, Oxford 1995).
  82. Sternberg, S.; Wright, C.E.; Knoll, R.L.; Monsell, S.: Motor programs in rapid speech: additional evidence; in Cole, Perception and production of fluent speech (Erlbaum, Hillsdale 1980).
  83. Straka, G.: Durée et timbre vocalique. Z. Phonet. allg. Sprachw. 12: 276–300 (1959).
  84. Tarnóczy, T.: Acoustic analysis of Hungarian vowels. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 8–12 (1964).
  85. Tarnóczy, T.: Can the problem of automatic speech recognition be solved by analysis alone? Rapports du 5e Congr. Int. d’Acoustique, vol. 2, Liège 1965.
  86. Vaissière, J.: Comment on Abbs’ paper; in Perkell, Klatt, Invariance and variability in speech processes, pp. 220– 222 (Hillsdale, LEA, 1986).
  87. Vayra, M.; Fowler, C.A.: Declination of supralaryngeal gestures in spoken Italian. Phonetica 49: 48–60 (1992).
  88. Vihman, M.M.: Phonological development: the origins of language in the child (Blackwell, Oxford 1996).
  89. Whalen, D.H.; Levitt, A.G.: The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. J. Phonet. 23: 349–366 (1995).
  90. Whiteside, S.: Temporal-based acoustic-phonetic patterns in read speech: some evidence for speaker sex differences. JIPA 26: 23–41 (1996).
  91. Zlatoustova, L.V.: Duration of vowel and consonant sounds of the Russian language. Scientific Notes of the Kazan’ State Univ. imeni V.I. Ul’yanov-Lenin 114: 99–173 (1954).


Pay-per-View Options
Direct payment This item at the regular price: USD 38.00
Payment from account With a Karger Pay-per-View account (down payment USD 150) you profit from a special rate for this and other single items.
This item at the discounted price: USD 26.50